Differing Libidos

[Sofiyya 1,687]

You might not like what I posted, but you don't have to be a$$holes about it to me, and then laugh about it when someone experienced on the site makes fun of you for it.

Yes, they do.

Your apparently intense desire to censure me--and control the way people think, or at least act, on the board--is why I used the term "fascist". Because it fits.

Get in line.

[Fandango 1,439]

Get over it, mmarlo.

First of all, Steven did not make the buttcrack thread. That was Gupt. And it was sarcastic. Secondly, who made fun of anyone here? No one has to agree, and there are those who will and those who won't. And people will express as such. The trick is to not work yourself up into such a fricken lather about someone strongly disagreeing with you.

And it's not fascist to call your polls socially retarded nor puritanical to find it tmi. I personally felt they were. BIG FRICKEN DEAL! I didn't tell you what to do or how to type nor did I report the threads or anything like that....I simply voiced my opinion. And you've been crying about it and having a tantrum ever since.

But thanks for taking my...and others' as well...opinions so seriously that it is still bothering you. Personally, if the shoe were on the other foot, I wouldn't have given it much creedance.

You wanna make this bigger than it was, go right ahead.

[Mags 112]

if it had been Steven (only using Steven as an example, not picking on him or anything!) posting three threads with that content I'd have still thought "wow, ####### mate?". LOL

Nice revisionist history: "wow ####### mate" is a lot different than the neutering you tried to administer to me.

I didn't try to administer anything. Get over it.

Edit: Lisa and I were posting at the same time...I wasn't copying her "get over it" comment!

Edited March 18, 2007 by mags

[Nagishkaw 510]

mmarlo,

You speak with a forked tongue. LisaD and mags were not laughing at you, and Gary does not post polls concerning genital coifs. How can you compare what he posts compared to what you posted? They are entirely different subjects. You jumped on me over my avitar and basically mocked the Almighty. My avitar, my beliefs, and my horse are my right , just the same as you keep perpetually reminding this forum that it's your right to post whatever.

I noticed certain words you used, such as Christianity, crucifying, missionaries, Puritans. So maybe you feel a bit insulted? I have no quarrel with you, sir. I was insulted but I did not go from thread to thread boo hooing and trying to justify myself. I don't compromise my convictions. I wonder, sir, if your fiance approves of your willingness to discuss pubic hair in a public forum on the world wide web. Ironically, you never mentioned hers or your preference.

You have reduced yourself again to sloppy finger pointing. Maybe you spent a little too much time in, errrm, the bush.

God bless you, as always.

[KarenCee 3]

Again, I wonder...how does expressing one's "ick" factor at a particular subject all of a sudden make them a fascist?

And you have a Ph.D?

fas·cism (fāsh'ĭz'əm) Pronunciation Key

n.

1. often Fascism

1. A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.

2. A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government.

2. Oppressive, dictatorial control.

Edited March 18, 2007 by KarenCee

[mmarlo 1]

And then Steven posts the "buttcrack" post...

Please - credit where credit is due. You can thank me for the buttcrack.

My bad. I meant you.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Give it up to Gupt for the buttcrack!

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Yeah, bow down to the glory of my gigantic smelly buttcrack, bichezzz!!!

[Nagishkaw 510]

Yeah, bow down to the glory of my gigantic smelly buttcrack, bichezzz!!!

NEVER!

[mmarlo 1]

Again, I wonder...how does expressing one's "ick" factor at a particular subject all of a sudden make them a fascist?

And you have a Ph.D?

fas·cism (fāsh'ĭz'əm) Pronunciation Key

n.

1. often Fascism

1. A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.

2. A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government.

2. Oppressive, dictatorial control.

Uh, it doesn't. Trying to control what other people post, a la definition 2, does. Saying it's icky is fine; I have no problem with that.

And, to respond to your other question no, I don't have a Ph.D. yet, but I will next month, unless I ask my advisor about his or his partner's pubic hair. I'm not dumb, but I might open my mouth at the wrong times and I might keep it open for too long...as this whole thing drags out.

OK, I'm letting go. My apologies to those I offended.

BTW, nice job Nag doing some discourse analysis and picking out all the religous illusions I incidentally made. Maybe we can argue about the religious stuff in another thread.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

People with Ph.D.s still like to have have a silly moment sometimes.

[Nagishkaw 510]

mmarlo,

I'm not really good at discussions, but I am big in the forgiveness department.

[ceriserose 1]

And then Steven posts the "buttcrack" post...

Please - credit where credit is due. You can thank me for the buttcrack.

No credit for you. Come back one year.

ETA: Thank you for the buttcrack, Gupt.

Edited March 18, 2007 by ceriserose

[forchika 4]

This thread has made me laugh all day!!!!!!

[KarenCee 3]

Again, I wonder...how does expressing one's "ick" factor at a particular subject all of a sudden make them a fascist?

And you have a Ph.D?

fas·cism (fāsh'ĭz'əm) Pronunciation Key

n.

1. often Fascism

1. A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.

2. A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government.

2. Oppressive, dictatorial control.

Uh, it doesn't. Trying to control what other people post, a la definition 2, does. Saying it's icky is fine; I have no problem with that.

And, to respond to your other question no, I don't have a Ph.D. yet, but I will next month, unless I ask my advisor about his or his partner's pubic hair. I'm not dumb, but I might open my mouth at the wrong times and I might keep it open for too long...as this whole thing drags out.

OK, I'm letting go. My apologies to those I offended.

BTW, nice job Nag doing some discourse analysis and picking out all the religous illusions I incidentally made. Maybe we can argue about the religious stuff in another thread.

To be literal, no one has tried to control anything you or anyone else has said on this thread. They have expressed their opinion. Opinions are like buttcracks (sorry y'all)...everyone has one. That does not make them a fascist.