Jump to content
Janelle2002

Donald Trump Zeroes in on Disney Layoffs in Bashing Guest Worker Visas

 Share

35 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Hahaha legal immigrants are now on the menu!

Donald Trump Zeroes in on Disney Layoffs in Bashing Guest Worker Visas

Variety

Ted Johnson 19 hours ago

The Art Of Selling Has Changed. Have You?

Microsoft Dynamics Sponsored

At Thursdays GOP debate, Donald Trump said that he was changing his hard-line view of the H-1B visa program to recruit highly skilled workers, telling co-moderator Megyn Kelly that he was softening the position, because we have to have talented people in this country.

But just hours later, his campaign released a statement in which he bashed the H-1B program for allowing temporary foreign workers, imported from abroad, for the explicit purpose of substituting for American workers at lower pay.

A shift, then a shift back? Trumps statement highlighted the need to crack down on H-1B abuse, citing in particular a story that is familiar to voters in Florida, which holds its primary on March 15: That is the case of 250 Walt Disney World IT workers who were laid off last year, their jobs transferred to foreign workers who obtained visas and were recruited by contractors.

GOP candidates have, from time to time, cited the case of the Disney workers in calling for cutting back the number of H-1B visas, or adding further restrictions, but Trump in particular has focused on the layoffs.

In his statement, Trump said that he would be ending outrageous practices such as those that occurred at Disney in Florida when Americans were forced to train their foreign replacements.

Trumps campaign highlighted the Disney workers at a recent campaign event.

On Sunday, two of the former IT workers, Dena Moore and Leo Perrero, appeared at a Trump rally in Alabama, according to Computerworld. They each have filed class action lawsuits against Disney, with Moore also naming as a defendant Cognizant Technology Solutions and Perrero naming HCL Inc.

Last week, Perrero testified before a Senate subcommittee, chaired by Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), who has endorsed Trump, and recounted to lawmakers being told that he and about two dozen other others would be laid off, their jobs transferred to foreign workers, and that they would be required to train them as a condition of their severance.

We all felt extremely humiliated when the foreign workers sat next to us, and watched everything that we did, he said.

Tech companies have sought to expand the visa program, as part of calls for immigration reform. Even though Trump at the debate appeared to side with Silicon Valley in their call for more highly skilled workers, he has also bashed rival Marco Rubio, who has sponsored legislation to increased the cap on such visas, which are designed to enable companies to temporarily employ workers in specialty occupations.

A spokeswoman for Disney did not immediately return a request for comment.

The company has said that many of the workers got new jobs at the company, while others retired. Disney employs about 74,000 workers in the central Florida area.

Still, Trumps campaign seems determined to use the issue of the Disney workers to give the issue visibility in Florida. If Rubio wins there, it would raise some doubts about Trumps ability to amass a majority of delegates before the GOP convention in July. If Trump wins the Sunshine State, it may go a long way toward eliminating a competitor he has taken to dismiss as little Marco.

https://www.yahoo.com/movies/donald-trump-zeroes-disney-layoffs-bashing-guest-worker-003614091.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: England
Timeline
At Thursdays GOP debate, Donald Trump said that he was changing his hard-line view of the H-1B visa program to recruit highly skilled workers, telling co-moderator Megyn Kelly that he was softening the position, because we have to have talented people in this country.

But just hours later, his campaign released a statement in which he bashed the H-1B program for allowing temporary foreign workers, imported from abroad, for the explicit purpose of substituting for American workers at lower pay.

These two views are not at odds. In fact, they are even consistent with official USCIS policy: allow foreign tech workers, but they cannot be used to replace otherwise competent American workers who can be found to do the same thing.

Good luck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These two views are not at odds. In fact, they are even consistent with official USCIS policy: allow foreign tech workers, but they cannot be used to replace otherwise competent American workers who can be found to do the same thing.

Yes they are

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline

h1b is not immigration.

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline

h1b is not immigration.

its a visa..and a great stepping stone to immigration

The content available on a site dedicated to bringing folks to America should not be promoting racial discord, euro-supremacy, discrimination based on religion , exclusion of groups from immigration based on where they were born, disenfranchisement of voters rights based on how they might vote.

horsey-change.jpg?w=336&h=265

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

A word has been edited and a post returned to the thread

Here is what is at odds:

Donald Trump stands up in a rally and makes an outlandish statement to fire up a crowd and within two hours the campaign or the Don issues a "clarification" to his original piece of Bull

The comment below is returned, minus the original quote:

Hahahahahaha great observation

A third post has been removed.

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

he bashed the H-1B program for allowing temporary foreign workers, imported from abroad, for the explicit purpose of substituting for American workers at lower pay.

[Regular-member hat on]

This is apparently a genuine problem. Read relevant posts by the retired CO, HFM181818, who contributes to the upper forums.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[Regular-member hat on]

This is apparently a genuine problem. Read relevant posts by the retired CO, HFM181818, who contributes to the upper forums.

And supporting companies that outsource jobs is ok? Says the guy who uses illegals to build his stuff? He is a walking bag of contradictions. And least these companies used people who are here legally

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Russia
Timeline

[Regular-member hat on]

This is apparently a genuine problem. Read relevant posts by the retired CO, HFM181818, who contributes to the upper forums.

It's a genuine problem because of American companies, not because of the H1B worker.

QCjgyJZ.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Ukraine
Timeline
Trumps statement highlighted the need to crack down on H-1B abuse,

I believe there is to much abuse. We need to decrease the number of these visa issued each year.

We went to a water park in Wisconsin this summer. The majority of workers were foreign. Seems they each had two jobs and were working 12-16 hours a day ,6 days a week. The water park basically had them hostage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Russia
Timeline

I believe there is to much abuse. We need to decrease the number of these visa issued each year.

We went to a water park in Wisconsin this summer. The majority of workers were foreign. Seems they each had two jobs and were working 12-16 hours a day ,6 days a week. The water park basically had them hostage.

The H1B is for skilled specialty workers. Where would you see H1B workers at a water park?

QCjgyJZ.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Russia
Timeline

Not sure which visas they were. Didn't ask…didn't care.

How do you know it's "visa abuse" if you don't know what visa's (if any) the workers had. You can't fix a problem if you don't know what the problem is. Which ties back into the topic title.

The penalties for companies that employ illegal workers or commit other forms of immigration fraud are not enough to stop them from doing it. So they have done it for years, and they continue to do it. They look for new and creative ways to exploit the system.

The problem can be fixed if and when there is political will to do so. Historically, there hasn't been, no matter who has been in office.

QCjgyJZ.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...