Incest: an age-old taboo

[Peikko 1,575]

Oh my, I'd forgotten about Rab, brilliant!

Edited to add

I wonder if they'll make any more of them? I should try to get the DVD next time I go home, my husband would love it, if he could make out what they were saying, lol

Edited March 16, 2007 by Purple_Hibiscus

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I noticed no asking for proof was required for comments made countering the hedonism theory. They're simply accepted as fact.

Again - you proposed the 'theory' without any reference to supporting facts. If we're not nailing down any specific examples, then the discussion will continue in the same fashion. Perhaps you could advance some ideas (relating to specific cultures) that support why you believe that.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

I noticed no asking for proof was required for comments made countering the hedonism theory. They're simply accepted as fact.

Again - you proposed the 'theory' without any reference to supporting facts. If we're not nailing down any specific examples, then the discussion will continue in the same fashion. Perhaps you could advance some ideas (relating to specific cultures) that support why you believe that.

And I asked, why no one other commentators are asked to do the same. This isn't a study hall. I'm just curious as to why some ideas are readily accepted with no proof and others require proof.

Edited March 16, 2007 by Green-eyed girl

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

I noticed no asking for proof was required for comments made countering the hedonism theory. They're simply accepted as fact.

Again - you proposed the 'theory' without any reference to supporting facts. If we're not nailing down any specific examples, then the discussion will continue in the same fashion. Perhaps you could advance some ideas (relating to specific cultures) that support why you believe that.

And I asked, why no one other commentators are asked to do the same. This isn't a study halll. I'm just curious as to why some ideas are readily accepted with no proof and others require proof.

The world is out to get you, GEG.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

I noticed no asking for proof was required for comments made countering the hedonism theory. They're simply accepted as fact.

Again - you proposed the 'theory' without any reference to supporting facts. If we're not nailing down any specific examples, then the discussion will continue in the same fashion. Perhaps you could advance some ideas (relating to specific cultures) that support why you believe that.

And I asked, why no one other commentators are asked to do the same. This isn't a study halll. I'm just curious as to why some ideas are readily accepted with no proof and others require proof.

The world is out to get you, GEG.

Just curious, bro. Not paranoid.

Edited March 16, 2007 by Green-eyed girl

[almaty 19]

yeap, because she is that important in the scheme of things

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I noticed no asking for proof was required for comments made countering the hedonism theory. They're simply accepted as fact.

Again - you proposed the 'theory' without any reference to supporting facts. If we're not nailing down any specific examples, then the discussion will continue in the same fashion. Perhaps you could advance some ideas (relating to specific cultures) that support why you believe that.

And I asked, why no one other commentators are asked to do the same.

And I answered "because you proposed the theory"

The onus is on you to first prove that the specific assertion you made is true, then we can discuss/rebut with examples. There's not going to be any sort of reasoned discussion until you do that. That's generally how a rational debate works.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Not paranoid? But you should be. Take it from someone who has seen the IMs.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Not paranoid? But you should be. Take it from someone who has seen the IMs.

Well, yea. If you're talking about that, I know. A certain someone regularly makes it known that there is negative gossip about me. It's hard not to notice coz they ain't too subtle, but equally hard to give a damn. Life is too short, ya know? Still not paranoid. Water finds it's own level, and I'm a calm sea. Thanks, bro!

Edited March 16, 2007 by Green-eyed girl

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Not paranoid? But you should be. Take it from someone who has seen the IMs.

Well, yea. If you're talking about that, I know. A certain someone regularly makes it known that there is negative gossip about me. It's hard not to notice, but equally hard to give a damn. Life is too short, ya know? Still not paranoid. Water finds it's own level, and I'm a calm sea. Thanks, bro!

Well, watch your back. They are out to get you. I'm rootin' for ya!

[Sofiyya 1,687]

I noticed no asking for proof was required for comments made countering the hedonism theory. They're simply accepted as fact.

Again - you proposed the 'theory' without any reference to supporting facts. If we're not nailing down any specific examples, then the discussion will continue in the same fashion. Perhaps you could advance some ideas (relating to specific cultures) that support why you believe that.

And I asked, why no one other commentators are asked to do the same.

And I answered "because you proposed the theory"

The onus is on you to first prove that the specific assertion you made is true, then we can discuss/rebut with examples. There's not going to be any sort of reasoned discussion until you do that. That's generally how a rational debate works.

You've been here long enough to know not to expect reasoned discussion or debate. However, I'm also sure you have noticed several assertions made without proof. When all have to prove their assertions, I will be happy to join in. I don't come here to work. I hardly go to work to work some days.

Not paranoid? But you should be. Take it from someone who has seen the IMs.

Well, yea. If you're talking about that, I know. A certain someone regularly makes it known that there is negative gossip about me. It's hard not to notice, but equally hard to give a damn. Life is too short, ya know? Still not paranoid. Water finds it's own level, and I'm a calm sea. Thanks, bro!

Well, watch your back. They are out to get you. I'm rootin' for ya!

Thank you, hon. Management notices too. This ain't brain surgery.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I noticed no asking for proof was required for comments made countering the hedonism theory. They're simply accepted as fact.

Again - you proposed the 'theory' without any reference to supporting facts. If we're not nailing down any specific examples, then the discussion will continue in the same fashion. Perhaps you could advance some ideas (relating to specific cultures) that support why you believe that.

And I asked, why no one other commentators are asked to do the same.

And I answered "because you proposed the theory"

The onus is on you to first prove that the specific assertion you made is true, then we can discuss/rebut with examples. There's not going to be any sort of reasoned discussion until you do that. That's generally how a rational debate works.

You've been here long enough to know not to expect reasoned discussion or debate. However, I'm also sure you have noticed several assertions made without proof. When all have to prove their assertions, I will be happy to join in. I don't come here to work. I hardly go to work to work some days.

Seems a little bizarre to me to not want to establish a factual/logical foundation for a specific argument. I guess we'll all make do with "I am right, you are wrong because I say so".

For a group of supposedly educated adults, there is a lot of childishness.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

I noticed no asking for proof was required for comments made countering the hedonism theory. They're simply accepted as fact.

Again - you proposed the 'theory' without any reference to supporting facts. If we're not nailing down any specific examples, then the discussion will continue in the same fashion. Perhaps you could advance some ideas (relating to specific cultures) that support why you believe that.

And I asked, why no one other commentators are asked to do the same.

And I answered "because you proposed the theory"

The onus is on you to first prove that the specific assertion you made is true, then we can discuss/rebut with examples. There's not going to be any sort of reasoned discussion until you do that. That's generally how a rational debate works.

You've been here long enough to know not to expect reasoned discussion or debate. However, I'm also sure you have noticed several assertions made without proof. When all have to prove their assertions, I will be happy to join in. I don't come here to work. I hardly go to work to work some days.

Seems a little bizarre to me to not want to establish a factual/logical foundation for a specific argument. I guess we'll all make do with "I am right, you are wrong because I say so".

For a group of supposedly educated adults, there is a lot of childishness.

All I'm saying is if proof is required for assertions, require it for all assertions. There's plenty of room for debate with much that is said here. Nothing immature about that. A debate is an exchange of ideas, supplimented by proof, not just on one side, but several.

Edited March 16, 2007 by Green-eyed girl

[almaty 19]

Not paranoid? But you should be. Take it from someone who has seen the IMs.

Well, yea. If you're talking about that, I know. A certain someone regularly makes it known that there is negative gossip about me. It's hard not to notice, but equally hard to give a damn. Life is too short, ya know? Still not paranoid. Water finds it's own level, and I'm a calm sea. Thanks, bro!

Well, watch your back. They are out to get you. I'm rootin' for ya!

brother arijit..in prison terms, your are "pumping up a punk"...

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Who's the punk?