Jump to content
Amhara

Every time I see a post about AP

 Share

4 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

My guy and I had a relatively easy AP - only 59 days in regular AP and 40 days stuck in ready (NIV). From the time the USEm received our case to the time our visa in hand was 167 days, or 5 months and 14 days. So we know what it's like to wait and wait, but we are grateful our AP lasted as short as it did. I have read and heard experiences that are heartbreaking; there seems to be no reason why someone is in AP for so long. Many stories on here on VJ are scary given how long some need to wait - even in cases of clean backgrounds. What is keeping those cases on hold, few know.

However, there are justifications for AP. It's not foolproof (how long was the San Bernadino shooter in AP for?) and it's not transparent, but it's necessary. It's the best DoS can do to balance national security with the visa issuance laws. I post this because this article: http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/02/pakistan-hangs-anti-blasphemy-law-governor-assassin-160229022556488.html just made me grateful for the type of protections in place, no matter how effective or ineffective they may be. We will never know who has been turned away, nor will we know how many have abused the system.

Yes, AP sucks, but so is the condition of the world today. AP isn't a personal vendetta; AP is a necessary step.



Signature coming soon...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

*** Thread moved from Off Topic to General Immigration Discussion -- observations are applicable to several visa processes. ***

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Jordan
Timeline

I agree. My husband also had AP, about 10 weeks, but I never complained. With the world the way it is today AP ESPECIALLY in T countries is justified. If people cannot understand why their spouse/fiance/family member is put under AP for security checks, they are clueless(in my opinion). Everyone wants their significant other here yesterday, I have seen many say that immigration is their "right" when in REALITY it is a privilege. I would much rather our government be overly cautious than not cautious enough. I also believe the loophole of adjusting status from a non-immigrant visa(b-1, f-1, VWP) should be closed. I don't care if someone "suddenly" decides to marry and wants to stay, I truly believe they should have to go home and undergo counselor processing and go through the same security checks BEFORE they are allowed to live here. Also I think with k-1 visas the petitioner must prove they have the funds for adjustment of status before the visa is approved. How many times do we see on this site people come and say "oh we don't have the money for AOS so my significant other will have to be out of status indefinitely" or "my significant and I married within the 90 day window 11 and a half years ago but we could never afford AOS until now". Really? You knew when you applied for the visa you would need the money for AOS. Sorry to be so blunt, I just don't understand the stupidity of many. Truly....


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why can people adjust status and stay here after marrying? I understand the idea of family unity - cool. I could understand if it was for someone who has been here for many years, but on VWP? You would think that if someone had the privilege of VWP, the spousal/fiance visa processing would be easier for them? Sure, international travel is expensive, but waiting can be much cheaper too!

I don't know. Nobody has the answers...



Signature coming soon...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...