Jump to content

65 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Other Country: England
Timeline
Posted

Securing a water border against non-military requires a tiny percentage of the manpower it does to secure land. Hint: Stand on a beach with a pair of binoculars. Notice how far you can see. Now imagine yourself in a fast interceptor craft chasing people down in a fishing boat. This is why even at its peak the number of people on boats/rafts crossing from cuba hit in the low tens of thousands.

Nobody in history who has ever built a wall was under the illusion it was impervious.

Good luck!

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted

Securing a water border against non-military requires a tiny percentage of the manpower it does to secure land. Hint: Stand on a beach with a pair of binoculars. Notice how far you can see. Now imagine yourself in a fast interceptor craft chasing people down in a fishing boat. This is why even at its peak the number of people on boats/rafts crossing from cuba hit in the low tens of thousands.

Nobody in history who has ever built a wall was under the illusion it was impervious.

the UK is an island with a natural barrier and still there are tens of thousand of Chinese that sneak in ever year.

Barriers won't fix the problem, laws and the proper execution *can* solve the bulk of the problem because they will not want to be here in the first place.

I don't believe it.. Prove it to me and I still won't believe it. -Ford Prefect

Filed: Other Country: England
Timeline
Posted

the UK is an island with a natural barrier and still there are tens of thousand of Chinese that sneak in ever year.

Barriers won't fix the problem, laws and the proper execution *can* solve the bulk of the problem because they will not want to be here in the first place.

tens of thousands? Thanks for proving my point. Those are numbers we can live with.

Good luck!

Posted

Securing a water border against non-military requires a tiny percentage of the manpower it does to secure land. Hint: Stand on a beach with a pair of binoculars. Notice how far you can see. Now imagine yourself in a fast interceptor craft chasing people down in a fishing boat. This is why even at its peak the number of people on boats/rafts crossing from cuba hit in the low tens of thousands.

Nobody in history who has ever built a wall was under the illusion it was impervious.

They got a new thing called radar. Can see what binoculars can not .

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted

tens of thousands? Thanks for proving my point. Those are numbers we can live with.

But that is just Chinese.. And we are much easier to infiltrate than an island..

I will cave on the wall, even a big beautiful wall, if we can also change and execute the laws..

I don't believe it.. Prove it to me and I still won't believe it. -Ford Prefect

Filed: Other Country: England
Timeline
Posted

But that is just Chinese.. And we are much easier to infiltrate than an island..

I will cave on the wall, even a big beautiful wall, if we can also change and execute the laws..

You got my vote :)

There is a deep rooted issue with the US. I just see a wall or similar as way we can see meaningful tangible change. But it is a symptom of a problem.

Good luck!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Just move it back a few hundred yards . We build floodwalls along rivers all the time .

You wouldn't believe how completely private-property rights have been obliterated just to do what's been done. These actions were not just shameful, but shocking and appalling.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted

So I was having dinner with my mom, my son, his girlfriend, my brother, and my wife - and to set the mood my family thinks of me as just slightly right of Rush Limbaugh and I am the devil reincarnated if I dare suggest we watch something other than MSNBC if we are watching the news. Sitting around the table eating I asked my son and his girlfriend out of the blue "So.. Clinton or Bernie? Tough choice there! Which one are you going to support?"

Naturally my mom butted in and talked about how much she disliked Cruz even more than Trump and then they bad mouthed a few republicans that were out of the race.. anyway they took a few minutes regurgitating everything they had heard on the comedy channel and MSNBC in the last 24 hours before I was able to ask again "Yeah... So.. Clinton or Bernie?" It was dead silence..

It is the same thing in reverse if you ask a group of republicans.. Or a mix of independents.... Everyone *kinda* knows who they are going to vote for but almost nobody wants to admit it. I am exactly there. I can't give a name and not be embarrassed if someone overhears.

It is good to see some of the left and right coming together here to equally bash the candidates on both sides with such free abandon - something finally brought us all together.

Nailed it.

Trump is the candidate, for example, a large number of people will vote for but not admit it to everyone else. "Yeah, he's crazy, how can we vote for this guy? "

....a few hours later at polling booth...

"Hmm, ah here we go, the curtain is up and nobody is watching right? Yeah, okay, what the heck, a check for Trump then I guess, why not."

The fact that so many people just "know" that he's crazy as heck but are voting for him is proof to me about how political correctness has suppressed the public discourse. It's somewhat like the hypocrisy over masturbation. You might do it, but you'll never admit it.

Both of these posts are spot on and exactly how I feel as well.

Posted

I think a wall is not a terribly difficult thing to build.. I have no doubt it can be done.

I also think tunnels and explosives and battering rams and wire cutters and jet-skis and boats are also easily build-able or obtainable. If the government is serious about controlling immigration they will make it extremely difficult to earn money here if you are not here legally. They do that by having extremely steep penalties for hiring illegal workers, make reporting the activity easy (and offer big rewards for doing so) and quickly following up on any reported activity.

We will have companies whining and using scare tactics talking about prices going up and they will be right - but then if the product they produce isn't worth paying a living wage to produce they should be making something else. Also this is how innovation comes into practice - at the start of the civil war states that had slaves had economies that were on average one tenth the size of states where it was illegal. Free labor did not build anything, it stunted growth everywhere it was. Where labor costs were higher they were an order of magnitude more efficient and pulling away.

I think Sanders has it half right here - by raising tariffs on items made by cheap labor (and basing it on labor costs) he can force other companies in other parts of the world to pay a higher wage and level the playing field not by lowering our standard of living but by forcing others to raise theirs by giving the workers a larger share of the profits... That formula depends on controlling immigration so that cheap labor does not happen on the home soil - neither party is suggesting an even slightly realistic solution on that portion. I don't have faith in a wall to do that - not on its own anyway.

Edit: Sorry it got a bit soapbox-ish

:thumbs:

Should I be concerned that you and I are thinking alike? :lol:

Filed: Other Country: England
Timeline
Posted

You wouldn't believe how completely private-property rights have been obliterated just to do what's been done. These actions were not just shameful, but shocking and appalling.

I did read it's a lot of work dealing with property rights because basically to build a wall you need to annex a minimum distance inside the border, since walls are not built on borders, but within countries.

You could also make an effective "wall" by ditching the wall idea and putting guard towers every so often including a lot more surveillance (drones, cameras). Objectively that's probably smarter anyway and more flexible.

Good luck!

Posted

A wall is flat out stupid, ineffective and inefficient. To say nothing of ugly, and requires a ton of private property.

The solution is to tighten up the laws in place and hold employers accountable for illegal workers. And to make it possible for actual work migration for jobs suitable for things like farming to be able to take place.

A wall is a symbol of the Brown fear affliction too many Americans harbor.

B and J K-1 story

  • April 2004 met online
  • July 16, 2006 Met in person on her birthday in United Arab Emirates
  • August 4, 2006 sent certified mail I-129F packet Neb SC
  • August 9, 2006 NOA1
  • August 21, 2006 received NOA1 in mail
  • October 4, 5, 7, 13 & 17 2006 Touches! 50 day address change... Yes Judith is beautiful, quit staring at her passport photo and approve us!!! Shaming works! LOL
  • October 13, 2006 NOA2! November 2, 2006 NOA2? Huh? NVC already processed and sent us on to Abu Dhabi Consulate!
  • February 12, 2007 Abu Dhabi Interview SUCCESS!!! February 14 Visa in hand!
  • March 6, 2007 she is here!
  • MARCH 14, 2007 WE ARE MARRIED!!!
  • May 5, 2007 Sent AOS/EAD packet
  • May 11, 2007 NOA1 AOS/EAD
  • June 7, 2007 Biometrics appointment
  • June 8, 2007 first post biometrics touch, June 11, next touch...
  • August 1, 2007 AOS Interview! APPROVED!! EAD APPROVED TOO...
  • August 6, 2007 EAD card and Welcome Letter received!
  • August 13, 2007 GREEN CARD received!!! 375 days since mailing the I-129F!

    Remove Conditions:

  • May 1, 2009 first day to file
  • May 9, 2009 mailed I-751 to USCIS CS
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Yep; however, the Powers That Were ran roughshod over a bunch of Federal laws (for example, environmental and animal-protection) to build the wall portions that are there.

I've never heard whether the (interesting) guard-tower idea was considered. Perhaps it wasn't authorized in the Federal legislation regarding the fence. There might also be concerns about illegal surveillance of U.S. citizens, although that has probably never stopped the government before.

The existing wall/fencing, everywhere that I've seen it, is indeed very, very ugly.

There might already be provisional visas for farm labor. If I were in charge of All Things, I'd issue a finite number of those visas, with the clear understanding that for every recipient who "disappeared" or didn't return from the U.S., 100 other migrants -- selected at random from that work crew -- would lose their visas, forfeit their pay, and receive a permanent ban from re-entry. Peer pressure might be stronger than most other influences.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Other Country: England
Timeline
Posted

The solution is to tighten up the laws in place and hold employers accountable for illegal workers. And to make it possible for actual work migration for jobs suitable for things like farming to be able to take place.

Well I can speak for everyone in this thread and say we all know that will never happen.

That's why people like me want a wall, because everybody else will whine and cry and moan about being racist any time we try and actually enforce laws against illegal immigrants. Meanwhile they are getting licenses (drivers', professional, etc.), free educations, free health care etc. ad infinitum.

The US is too weak to enforce its own laws because its leadership lacks leadership. Hence, wall.

Trump says it will cost $12B. If you spend all that on more drones and guys in watch towers, I'm fine with that, too.

I spent years in the south. That joke about driving by home depot and picking up mexicans is based in literal truth. I regularly drove along a road full of people everybody knew to be illegal migrants from mexico. We knew it, the cops knew it. Nobody cared, nobody did a thing. Nobody ever will.

Good luck!

Posted

Well I can speak for everyone in this thread and say we all know that will never happen.

That's why people like me want a wall, because everybody else will whine and cry and moan about being racist any time we try and actually enforce laws against illegal immigrants. Meanwhile they are getting licenses (drivers', professional, etc.), free educations, free health care etc. ad infinitum.

The US is too weak to enforce its own laws because its leadership lacks leadership. Hence, wall.

Trump says it will cost $12B. If you spend all that on more drones and guys in watch towers, I'm fine with that, too.

I spent years in the south. That joke about driving by home depot and picking up mexicans is based in literal truth. I regularly drove along a road full of people everybody knew to be illegal migrants from mexico. We knew it, the cops knew it. Nobody cared, nobody did a thing. Nobody ever will.

the reason "nobody did a thing, nobody ever will' is because the rich play by their own rules. if they get caught hiring illegal workers (funny, right) they pay a fine and move on.

why you think a wall is going to stop rich people from getting their cheap labor is beyond me.

Posted

A wall is flat out stupid, ineffective and inefficient. To say nothing of ugly, and requires a ton of private property.

The solution is to tighten up the laws in place and hold employers accountable for illegal workers. And to make it possible for actual work migration for jobs suitable for things like farming to be able to take place.

A wall is a symbol of the Brown fear affliction too many Americans harbor.

I love it when Democrats get concerned about taking taking away the hard earned gains of citizens. It may single a shift

As for your brown fear. We don't care where they come from. Its about illegally being in our country not the skin color.

Why does the left make anything and everything about race. It's like freaking O- blood. It's the universal donor. Anything you don't agree with. Scream racism

the reason "nobody did a thing, nobody ever will' is because the rich play by their own rules. if they get caught hiring illegal workers (funny, right) they pay a fine and move on.

why you think a wall is going to stop rich people from getting their cheap labor is beyond me.

or liberals from getting votes and giving them free stuff. You left out the other part of the equation. We are getting it from both sides

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...