University fires professor who says Sandy Hook was a hoax

[Dakine10 5,452]

Some believe that no one landed on the moon and that it was a fake

I have no problem with people believing crazy stuff as long as they don't bother or harm others. I do think there is a line, and harassing parents of children who were murdered is way, way across that line.

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

I have no problem with people believing crazy stuff as long as they don't bother or harm others. I do think there is a line, and harassing parents of children who were murdered is way, way across that line.

Exactly

[ExPatty 502]

it's actually one of the more popular 'false flags', i don't know if that's just because it's more recent or the way it unfolded on the news..

you can get the book this prof wrote for free now, btw..LIMITED TIME!! i'm all over it.

http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/sandy-hook-massacre/

ETA. damn this thing is 426 pages long

Grr, Thanks to you I just read the entire thing not including the preface and appendices--so only about 200 actual pages.

It is an interesting read for a few reasons. As far as its arguments are concerned a couple warranted a googling to delve deeper. The bulk were immediately discardable. The mindset of the authors is quite interesting.

[smilesammich 10,727]

Grr, Thanks to you I just read the entire thing not including the preface and appendices--so only about 200 actual pages.

It is an interesting read for a few reasons. As far as its arguments are concerned a couple warranted a googling to delve deeper. The bulk were immediately discardable. The mindset of the authors is quite interesting.

i started to read it, but was put off when the first 'shocker' was that sandy hook elementary had been closed for a while prior to the murders. sort of lost my interest right there, because that's dumb.

[ExPatty 502]

i started to read it, but was put off when the first 'shocker' was that sandy hook elementary had been closed for a while prior to the murders. sort of lost my interest right there, because that's dumb.

Closed for four years, no less. But I can't help but admire such a statement for its audacity. Support for that lended by such evidence as the handicapped parking spaces were not painted blue as dictated by law. But I thought, hmm, I think mine at work are not blue, either, and when I got to work lo and behold, I guess my work has been closed since at least 2008 as well. Also the school in a state of disrepair apparently consistent with being condemned.

Something that was interesting to me for about 3 seconds until I tried to guess as to a reasonable explanation is that there are many screen shots in the book of the sandy hook shooting mentioned on news websites before it happened. How is that possible if it were not pre-planned and just a drill by the government? You can see for yourself if you google sandy hook shooting and set google to a date of 1/1/2011, for example, through 6/30/2012. Articles talking about it before it happened! Simply google doesn't cache properly and or the date is for the page, not its content.

Other damning evidence includes a query as to why there was so much paper in nancy lanza's shredder--proof if there ever was that it wasn't a real shredder owned by her.

There are also pictures of workers drilling bullet holes into the building and setting up the area before the attack, apparently.

There is also an analysis disputing the authenticity of the death record of one of the kids, criticism of how one of the parents laughed immediately prior to a press conference talking about his dead daughter, etc. There's a lot of stuff in the book.

One of the least convincing arguments was that the lanza house was staged and all of these pictures were taken, yet in the pictures things are moving about constantly due to "government ineptness", including in many of the pictures somebody who left a sheet of paper directing the staging of the house. The reason this is a problem is because the hoax also relies upon collusion and secrecy of literally hundreds of people, or at the very least many dozens.

[smilesammich 10,727]

One of the least convincing arguments was that the lanza house was staged and all of these pictures were taken, yet in the pictures things are moving about constantly due to "government ineptness", including in many of the pictures somebody who left a sheet of paper directing the staging of the house. The reason this is a problem is because the hoax also relies upon collusion and secrecy of literally hundreds of people, or at the very least many dozens.

as i was skimming, i noticed the 'adam lanza pictures are obviously not real photos of a human' bit, evidenced by four photos of adam lanza.

[ExPatty 502]

as i was skimming, i noticed the 'adam lanza pictures are obviously not real photos of a human' bit, evidenced by four photos of adam lanza.

The multiple authors aren't all on the same page. One argues adam lanza never existed, but another argues that only adam and his mother were killed that day.

[smilesammich 10,727]

The multiple authors aren't all on the same page. One argues adam lanza never existed, but another argues that only adam and his mother were killed that day.

how can the government be completely inept but absolute masterminds at the same time?

[ExPatty 502]

how can the government be completely inept but absolute masterminds at the same time?

That's the magic of their genius. They are all knowing and all consuming but screw up just enough to make people think they are stupid and incompetent and couldn't possibly orchestrate something like this!

[OnMyWayID 1,489]

His blog is here: http://memoryholeblog.com/

Eight days into the year and his blog posts so far:

Jan 8th - He's being persecuted by numerous online stalkers

Jan 7th - Overview of a new book outlining the false flags of Charlie Hebdo and San Bernadino

Jan 6th - Overview of a new documentary about one of the Sandy Hook victims he believes never existed

Jan 5th - A guest host article about the Media discrediting him

Jan 4th - Google plans to blanket 95% of the US in dangerous microwave radiation

Jan 3rd - William Kristol and other Conservatives worried Donald Trump will expose them as the true 9/11 Engineers

Edited January 8, 2016 by OnMyWayID

[smilesammich 10,727]

His blog is here: http://memoryholeblog.com/

Eight days into the year and his blog posts so far:

Jan 8th - He's being persecuted by numerous online stalkers

Jan 7th - Overview of a new book outlining the false flags of Charlie Hebdo and San Bernadino

Jan 6th - Overview of a new documentary about one of the Sandy Hook victims he believes never existed

Jan 5th - A guest host article about the Media discrediting him

Jan 4th - Google plans to blanket 95% of the US in dangerous microwave radiation

Jan 3rd - William Kristol and other Conservatives worried Donald Trump will expose them as the true 9/11 Engineers

one of the parents provided their kid's death certificate, of course FAKE.

The article include an analysis of the copy of the "death certificate" for Noah Pozner that Lenny provided to Kelley, which turns out to be a fake. If Noah had actually died at Sandy Hook, there would have been no reason to fake one, which implies that Noah did not die at Sandy Hook and confirms that Lenny is a fraud. Here is the certificate:

As Dennis Cimino has observed, why would they need to use different typewriter ribbons on that certificate for different fields of it? and why is the certificate clearly with shaded areas that are not uniform like authentic death certificates are? You can clearly see that the typewriter clarity is blurry in some fields and clear and crisp in the others, meaning that, while the blurry ones may have been done with a typewriter, the clear sections were photoshopped into the document.

His observations have been reinforced by additional observations sent to me by Bob Sims:

(1) I am rather surprised, according to the copy you posted, that any branch of government was still using typewriters at all, when computers can do it so much better. However, the use of a typewriter in this case makes it much easier to spot fraud.

(2) For starters, can you see any reason for the government typist to change the ball back and forth on the IBM machine I must assume was being used, because I cannot think of a reason to go to the extra trouble, and what for?

(3) For example, look at the very top in Box 3, where the date is posted. Why is that type clearly smaller than the rest of the page? You would have to change the ball for this, but for what reason?

(4) Now look at the capital “A” in Box 12 for Residence (Alpine). It is identical to the capital “A” in Box 22 for Mailing Address (Alpine). It is also identical to the capital “A” in Box 33 for Funeral Home. This is totally as expected, is it not? Read on.

(5) Note that the capital “A” in question above in three different boxes has a small flag at its pinnacle. Compare that to the capital “A”, without the small flag in Box 4, Time of Death, Box 26, City or Town, Box 27, County of Death, and Box 39, Time Pronounced, and in Box 46, Time of Injury.

(6) Compare Box 1, “Noah,” with Box 7, “November,” and you will clearly see that the spacing between the “N” and the “o” is quite different.

(7) Compare Box 1, the “N” in “Noah,” with Box 26, the “N” in “SANDY.” They are clearly different.

(8) Compare Box 1, “Samuel,” with Box 11, “Sandy,” and again, the spacing between the “S” and the “a” is clearly not the same.

(9) In fact, the entire spacing in Box 1 is unlike any other in the forged document.

(10) Compare the name “Pozner” in Box 1 with “Pozner” in Box 20, clearly not the same.

Noah Pozner’s death certificate is a fake, which we have proven on a dozen or more different grounds. But if Sandy Hook had been real, there would have been no reason to fake it. QED Which means that James Tracy has called his bluff and he will be unable to substantiate his claim for copyright infringement, which was ridiculous on its face.

[ExPatty 502]

His blog is here: http://memoryholeblog.com/

Eight days into the year and his blog posts so far:

Jan 8th - He's being persecuted by numerous online stalkers

Jan 7th - Overview of a new book outlining the false flags of Charlie Hebdo and San Bernadino

Jan 6th - Overview of a new documentary about one of the Sandy Hook victims he believes never existed

Jan 5th - A guest host article about the Media discrediting him

Jan 4th - Google plans to blanket 95% of the US in dangerous microwave radiation

Jan 3rd - William Kristol and other Conservatives worried Donald Trump will expose them as the true 9/11 Engineers

Two of those are undeniably true (Jan 5, 8). Ergo, they all must be.

[ExPatty 502]

one of the parents provided their kid's death certificate, of course FAKE.

See, you can't help it; you went back to the book. This is why I got stuck with this stuff for a couple of hours last night. Before you know it you'll be reading essays on how the moon landing was faked and how the government buried live children at waco (that was a new one to me, but referenced in the book briefly as a comment to some article--still not sure if it was facetious or not, though).

[OnMyWayID 1,489]

(3) For example, look at the very top in Box 3, where the date is posted. Why is that type clearly smaller than the rest of the page? You would have to change the ball for this, but for what reason?

The entire proof rest on the assumption that it was typed as opposed to a form ran through a dot matrix or drum based printer to fill in the fields - which explains the different sized fonts, spacing, blurriness (weel - subsequent copies of a folded paper would cause this as well), and the name offset on the first field.

Edited January 8, 2016 by OnMyWayID

[smilesammich 10,727]

See, you can't help it; you went back to the book. This is why I got stuck with this stuff for a couple of hours last night. Before you know it you'll be reading essays on how the moon landing was faked and how the government buried live children at waco (that was a new one to me, but referenced in the book briefly as a comment to some article--still not sure if it was facetious or not, though).

is that in the book? i clicked through onmyway's link to dude's blog.

i'm a pretty big conspiracy nut, for entertainment purposes. i do buy into bill hicks cospiracy though