Jump to content
Sousuke

Grand Compromise on Firearms at the National Level

By Sousuke in Current Events and Hot Social Topics

 Share

Grand Compromise  

14 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you support a compromise, Universal Background Checks for Universal Conceal Carry

    • Yes, I would support the Compromise
      10
    • No, I would not support the Compromise
      4

  2. 2. My previous answer was based on the following

    • I support private ownership of firearms, but do not believe in compromising my rights
      2
    • I support private ownership of firearms, and see this as a strong balance and constitutional
      8
    • I support private ownership, but not conceal carry and do not want to compromise on the issue.
      1
    • I support private ownership but it is limited to single action / non semi autos
      2
    • I do not support private ownership and feel all sales of firearms should end and people should be forced to turn in their weapons
      1

63 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Boiler Grand Master

Boiler   46,246

Posted
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
 Timeline
Posted

One Post removed for violating the following stipulation of VJ's TOS

last_post.png Post Content intended to degrade, intimidate, or incite violence or prejudicial action against a broad demographic or group of people identified by a unifying trait or characteristic (discrimination). For instance, racist or sexist content may be considered hate speech.

A few more for quoting/referencing

Would Gun Owners not fall within that description?

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

The Nature Boy
The Nature Boy

That would be a no go quick

Teddy B
Teddy B

On the right to assemble, you might have a point. That is taken to extreme far too often. But the freedom of speech is the greatest of all our freedoms I believe. Without that freedom, we would have a

B_J
B_J

By the way, the point behind this discussion, how to possibly have a mental health requirement, is really fascinating. Along with, are we willing to give away some of our rights for our safety. I re

Ban Hammer Grand Master

Ban Hammer   13,641

Posted
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
 Timeline
Posted

Oh and #firstworldproblems are hard.

i can't figure out how to post this cat dancing on pizza pic! #firstworldproblems.....

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

TBoneTX Grand Master

TBoneTX   46,276

Posted
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
 Timeline
Posted

atomic wedgie

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/249659-wedgies-si-man/page-1

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...