Donald Trump: My Fans Were Right To Beat Up Black Protester

[-relo- 105]

that's funny. i'm as white as white gets and i'd feel 100 times safer going to a blm rally over a trump rally.

enjoy yourself

[Merrytooth 5,748]

I dare you to go in the BLM shooting thread and say this very thing.

BLM has been camping outside the Police Precinct for days and the Polices are still so kind to accommodate them, protect them, send them to hospital when they got shot at.

[smilesammich 10,727]

Yah, because the BLM thinks that they have white ally!

blm has white support, especially from the youngsters. in my experience younger people typically have a better grasp of concepts such as white privilege and institutional racism than older folks do.

enjoy yourself

[-relo- 105]

Put your money where your mouth is. Because in that thread, this very thing happened but it was the BLM's fault for attacking the men who went looking for the confrontation.

near a rally & at a rally. I see a difference already. how about you?

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

near a rally & at a rally. I see a difference already. how about you?

Considering the men were close enough for the BLM to engage them, I'd say they were at the rally. And filming it at the same time within a few feet.

Edited November 24, 2015 by Stay Woke

[Janelle2002 3,865]

BLM has been camping outside the Police Precinct for days and the Polices are still so kind to accommodate them, protect them, send them to hospital when they got shot at.

I thought ambulance take people to hospital

[Merrytooth 5,748]

I thought ambulance take people to hospital

Sure

[Merrytooth 5,748]

Considering the men were close enough for the BLM to engage them, I'd say they were at the rally. And filming it at the same time within a few feet.

True

Is it against law to be there and filming it?

By the way, the media reported that 2 men responsible for the shooting are caught by the police.

1 white man and 1 hispanic man

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

Got to love the media. Check out this completely false headline.

Trump says fans right to beat up black protestor.

Lol

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

True

Is it against law to be there and filming it?

By the way, the media reported that 2 men responsible for the shooting are caught by the police.

1 white man and 1 hispanic man

I just read that.

It's not against the law. I just know they were trying to provoke them into a conformation. And unfortunately they fell for it.

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

Got to love the media. Check out this completely false headline.

Trump says fans right to beat up black protestor.

Lol

"Maybe he should have been roughed up because it was absolutely disgusting what he was doing,"said Trump.

Looks like the 1st amendment is only protected in certain cases. Because all the folks (outside of Souske) who are all about protecting rights seem to be really silent on this.

[Expat1 971]

True

Is it against law to be there and filming it?

By the way, the media reported that 2 men responsible for the shooting are caught by the police.

1 white man and 1 hispanic man

In the convoluted world of endless VJ race-baiting "white" means "non-black" unless extremely dark skinned people do things that bad non-black people also do so they are de-blacked and as they are de-blacked they are also "white"

So "white" ranges from very dark-skinned bad people (example slaveholders in Ethiopia) to all other "non-black" UNLESS a very dark-skinned person does something bad and his/her bad actions can be twisted into making that person into a victim or martyr or can be placed on the shoulders of an unrelated white person (such as when a very dark skinned person shoots up a bus stop but it is because the majority white NRA doesn't allow gun control in a faraway state) and then / only then may that very dark-skinned remain black. It is RARE that unrelated white people cannot be found to shoulder blame so it's all good.

Conclusion: Save yourself some time. Just say 2 white guys.

[GandD 5,966]

Thread locked for a cooling off period. The posting in the thread has been fairly aggressive so I think its in everyone's best interest to let it be for a bit

[GandD 5,966]

Thread reopened for posting as promised. Please be aware of the following stipulation of VJ's TOS going forward. Action will follow if not adhered to

Make comments in a Post either direct or implied toward another member that are purposely designed to upset, antagonize, make fun of, belittle, harass, insult, or otherwise instigate an argument that takes away from the personal enjoyment of the Service by other users.

[JohnR! 5,495]

Ergo, Trump himself needs to be roughed up, because it doesn't get much more disgusting than himself and the people who attend his rallies...

"Maybe he should have been roughed up because it was absolutely disgusting what he was doing,"said Trump.

Looks like the 1st amendment is only protected in certain cases. Because all the folks (outside of Souske) who are all about protecting rights seem to be really silent on this.