Refugee or Terrorist?

[Boiler 46,277]

also sucks that in 15 years america still hasn't learned anything about combating terrorism. you can't fight fear with fear. or violence with violence. i mean you can but, don't expect an end to it.

Surrendering has always worked so much better.

[smilesammich 10,727]

Surrendering has always worked so much better.

who said anything about surrendering? oh wait, are you talking about strengthening the patriot act, surrendering our freedom?

[Robby999 1,024]

Surrendering has always worked so much better.

Submission just comes natural for some!

[Boiler 46,277]

Submission just comes natural for some!

Careful, that may lead into a non approved VJ Family area.

[Robby999 1,024]

Careful, that may lead into a non approved VJ Family area.

Noted!

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

silly to even attempt to blame the consequences of our military actions on a political party. 9/11 happened and we, as a country, knee jerked ourselves into a royal cf. damn right it's bush's fault. and damn right it's obama's fault. but more than either potus, i remember pretty vividly how folks were saying we should just obliterate ME off the map. the people that have had the extreme misfortune of being born into this nightmare overseas, have never- by my recollection-had the sympathy of the united states. they've always been viewed as necessary collateral damage.

the facts say that 0 refugees have committed terrorist acts in this country. all i'm seeing here is a bunch of fear mongering. typical.

Not really the Boston Marathon bombers were political refugees Edited November 19, 2015 by junebug1210

[Boiler 46,277]

It really the Boston Marathon bombers were political refugees

They were it seems Asylum seekers, like this lot:

[smilesammich 10,727]

It really the Boston Marathon bombers were political refugees

no. they were "the children of an asylee" there is a difference.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-bier/the-boston-bombers-were-n_b_8584016.html

not that it matters over all, i get it, you don't want there to be any chance or possibility that someone who could be radicalized to live freely on american soil. good luck with that. you're not going to get the end result you want by persecuting a particular religion, or building a wall, or monitoring mosques. or any of that nonsense. have you seen the frontline piece showing the three years olds being indoctrinated by isis? children are the most vunerable and the most easily manipulated. the terrorists want their fresh meat and we're handing it do them.

They were it seems Asylum seekers, like this lot:

no, they were the children of asylum seekers. find a jpg of a younger truck load.

[Boiler 46,277]

no. they were "the children of an asylee" there is a difference.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-bier/the-boston-bombers-were-n_b_8584016.html

not that it matters over all, i get it, you don't want there to be any chance or possibility that someone who could be radicalized to live freely on american soil. good luck with that. you're not going to get the end result you want by persecuting a particular religion, or building a wall, or monitoring mosques. or any of that nonsense. have you seen the frontline piece showing the three years olds being indoctrinated by isis? children are the most vulnerable and the most easily manipulated. the terrorists want their fresh meat and we're handing it do them.

no, they were the children of asylum seekers. find a jpg of a younger truck load.

Picking at straws.

So you are saying ban children of asylees?

[JohnR! 5,495]

also sucks that in 15 years america still hasn't learned anything about combating terrorism. you can't fight fear with fear. or violence with violence. i mean you can but, don't expect an end to it.

[smilesammich 10,727]

Picking at straws.

So you are saying ban children of asylees?

i don't think it's picking at straws when the argument appears to be that refugees are dangerous when that isn't what the facts say.

and no, no banning of anything. you posted the suicide bomber free zone sign thing, right? do you not see the irony???

[Boiler 46,277]

and no, no banning of anything. you posted the suicide bomber free zone sign thing, right? do you not see the irony???

What is wrong with wanting to live in a suicide bomber free zone?

[JohnR! 5,495]

i don't think it's picking at straws when the argument appears to be that refugees are dangerous when that isn't what the facts say.

and no, no banning of anything. you posted the suicide bomber free zone sign thing, right? do you not see the irony???

Before the Paris attacks the news of Chinese terrorists was on the media, but it seems the hygrophiles missed out on them....

http://www.ibtimes.com/foreigners-join-isis-photos-suspected-chinese-islamic-state-fighter-circulate-online-1688028

Foreigners Join ISIS: Photos Of Suspected 'Chinese Islamic State Fighter' Circulate Online

By Michelle FlorCruz @mflorcruz m.florcruz@ibtimes.com on September 13 2014 6:36 PM EDT

Iraqi sources claim to have caught a Chinese citizen fighting for the Islamic State militant group. Iraqi Ministry Of Defense/ Facebook

Photos are circulating online in China of what is suspected to be a Chinese citizen fighting for the Islamic State militant group. Though the photos initially surfaced Tuesday, there still has been no confirmation of the identity or nationality of the man.

Iraqi sources claim to have caught a Chinese citizen fighting for the Islamic State militant group. Iraqi Ministry Of Defense/ Facebook

The South China Morning Post reported a Facebook page purportedly run by the Iraqi Ministry of Defense uploaded two photos of what appears to be a captured Islamic State fighter, describing the captured militant as a “Chinese daash.” Daash is an acronym for the “Islamic State in Iraq and Syria,” or ISIS. If the allegations are true, it would be the first confirmed Chinese national to be found fighting for the extremist militant group, joining a growing number of foreigners who have been recruited from the U.K., Australia and the United States.

Though the Chinese embassy in Iraq declined requests for comment by the Post, it wouldn’t be the first time Chinese citizens were suspected of joining Islamist militant groups. The New York Times reported last year about a YouTube video showing a man going by the name of Bo Wang, who said he had joined militants to fight in Syria.

China’s Muslim population, predominantly in the western regions of the country, is often marginalized by the officially atheist Chinese government. “Muslim rights are forcibly seized in China, India, [and] Palestine,” Islamic State self-proclaimed caliph Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi said in a July speech, and urged Muslims in those regions to join the cause.

Yin Gang, a West Asian and African Studies scholar at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said it's possible hundreds of Chinese nationals are currently fighting for the Islamic State, citing previous examples of Chinese citizens joining al-Qaeda in Afghanistan.

[smilesammich 10,727]

What is wrong with wanting to live in a suicide bomber free zone?

nothing wrong with wanting it.

[Boiler 46,277]

nothing wrong with wanting it.

Good