deportation

[Jenn! 918]

Peezy must be off holding hands with HOPE in empathy.

I seriously hope you are not accusing another member of immigration fraud. Pretty sure that's against TOS. In any case, it has been reported.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Imagining the worse. Figures. Enjoy wasting the moderator's time with ASSumptions.

Edited March 4, 2007 by Green-eyed girl

[Jenn! 918]

Imagining the worse. Figures. Enjoy wasting the moderator's time with ASSumptions.

So what did you mean then?

P.S. the ASSumptions thing - v. cute, so original.

Edited March 4, 2007 by jenn3539

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Nothing here deserves original.

[Ban Hammer 13,345]

Peezy must be off holding hands with HOPE in empathy.

I seriously hope you are not accusing another member of immigration fraud. Pretty sure that's against TOS. In any case, it has been reported.

that's a real stretch of the imagination, jenn

[mawilson 2,133]

I seriously hope you are not accusing another member of immigration fraud. Pretty sure that's against TOS. In any case, it has been reported.

Why is accusing another member of immigration fraud against TOS?

[Jenn! 918]

I seriously hope you are not accusing another member of immigration fraud. Pretty sure that's against TOS. In any case, it has been reported.

Why is accusing another member of immigration fraud against TOS?

I think it would fall under defamation.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

It could be defamation for a member to falsely accuse a member of accusing another member of immigration fraud.

[mawilson 2,133]

It could be defamation for a member to falsely accuse a member of accusing another member of immigration fraud.

[brnidokiegurl 0]

Im wondering where the fraud comes from, i read from the past, sounded like they tried to make it twice and didnt now their apart (hence) the paper husband since hes not with her or living in a normal married situation but husband in paper name only.

[Jenn! 918]

Im wondering where the fraud comes from, i read from the past, sounded like they tried to make it twice and didnt now their apart (hence) the paper husband since hes not with her or living in a normal married situation but husband in paper name only.

Quite possible I misinterpreted what the OP was trying to say....

[Alex+R 0]

I interpreted it that the marriage was entered into in good faith by both parties (perhaps, or at least the OP) but ultimately the OP left the country and now they are only married legally but have no real marriage. So it's just a marriage on paper.

Either that or she is married to a paper doll. Not sure.

[brnidokiegurl 0]

possibility or maybe we both have , thats just the way i got it. So in comparing this to someone else, also based (on what), unless you know this other person did a fraud, sounds like someone owes someone else an apology for reporting

[Ban Hammer 13,345]

possibility or maybe we both have , thats just the way i got it. So in comparing this to someone else, also based (on what), unless you know this other person did a fraud, sounds like someone owes someone else an apology for reporting

agreed

[mybackpages 0]

possibility or maybe we both have , thats just the way i got it. So in comparing this to someone else, also based (on what), unless you know this other person did a fraud, sounds like someone owes someone else an apology for reporting

agreed

There is term for this kind of post in soccer