Jump to content
Teddy B

High Number Of CEHST Participants Leaving The Forum

 Share

157 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Sure man, just tell me what to do to make the site what you want it to be. Like, specifically what is it you think I can do to make you happy Teddy?

I haven't been flip with you, but if that's how you want to play it, then fine.

How bout starting with what I pm'd you about 3 weeks ago and you never got back to me. How about getting Mr. Big Dog back in here. Because if you were here doing what you said you were going to do, he wouldn't have gotten banned for posting an article and accused of "inciting violence". In turn Spooky would still be here as well, so maybe you should send him a pm apologizing for your failure.

And how about giving me a straight answer as to why you didn't or couldn't follow through with minimizing the moderator response on frivolous reports in this forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline

I haven't been flip with you, but if that's how you want to play it, then fine.

How bout starting with what I pm'd you about 3 weeks ago and you never got back to me. How about getting Mr. Big Dog back in here. Because if you were here doing what you said you were going to do, he wouldn't have gotten banned for posting an article and accused of "inciting violence". In turn Spooky would still be here as well, so maybe you should send him a pm apologizing for your failure.

And how about giving me a straight answer as to why you didn't or couldn't follow through with minimizing the moderator response on frivolous reports in this forum.

So the problem is you don't like the way other moderators handled something because I was absent for something?

That's probably going to be a reoccurring problem as I have to do stuff at the job they pay me for ya know?

BTW, the only thing keeping MBD and Spooky from posting is them. People don't like the way the admin wants his site ran. Its a shame I know. Again, nothing I or any moderator can do about it.

Buy the site maybe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the problem is you don't like the way other moderators handled something because I was absent for something?

That's probably going to be a reoccurring problem as I have to do stuff at the job they pay me for ya know?

BTW, the only thing keeping MBD and Spooky from posting is them. People don't like the way the admin wants his site ran. Its a shame I know. Again, nothing I or any moderator can do about it.

Buy the site maybe?

Then perhaps you should step down and let someone else do the job.

Not true for MBD, there were ridiculous stipulations put on his return and he refuses to abide by them.

Still no straight answer to my question, priceless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

Then perhaps you should step down and let someone else do the job.

Not true for MBD, there were ridiculous stipulations put on his return and he refuses to abide by them.

Still no straight answer to my question, priceless.

Not try to start anything, but don't you think you are being alittle harsh?

1d35bdb6477b38fedf8f1ad2b4c743ea.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline

Then perhaps you should step down and let someone else do the job.

Not true for MBD, there were ridiculous stipulations put on his return and he refuses to abide by them.

Still no straight answer to my question, priceless.

If that's what people here want, I'll be happy to.

But its not going to change any of the things you're complaining about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not directing this @ anyone. But, it looks like a good spot.

Another reason I didn't want any part of being a moderator.

I think the reason my name came up along with G's was so no matter what a person's political or social issue leaning are. Everyone would feel they had an ally in the mod team. When that happens, people tend to feel that they should get special treatment or insider info. It just can't happen.

I use to rip Charles privately for not giving me special treatment. But, he just couldn't. He has an obligation to the site.

We all know Charles leans right on most issues. Hell he leans so far right he walks in circles. But, he can't moderate that way. It's biased

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We all know Charles leans right on most issues. Hell he leans so far right he walks in circles. But, he can't moderate that way. It's biased

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline

Not directing this @ anyone. But, it looks like a good spot.

Another reason I didn't want any part of being a moderator.

I think the reason my name came up along with G's was so no matter what a person's political or social issue leaning are. Everyone would feel they had an ally in the mod team. When that happens, people tend to feel that they should get special treatment or insider info. It just can't happen.

I use to rip Charles privately for not giving me special treatment. But, he just couldn't. He has an obligation to the site.

We all know Charles leans right on most issues. Hell he leans so far right he walks in circles. But, he can't moderate that way. It's biased

I still think you should be a mod. Frankly I think everyone should be a mod so they would know how ridiculous this whole conversation is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Teddy, point made... please quit jumping on G.

Others will venture into this forum and begin contributing fresh ideas and perspectives.

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline

He was a mod actually on the sister site. It never developed a critical mass of people and died.

Yeah I know. It would have been ideal to have left and right leaning co-consoles.

Again though, not like it would allow us to treat CE&HST like it didn't fall under the Admin's directives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

I've noticed a higher than normal number of longtime CEHST posters leaving lately. Anyone have any ideas as to why? (Please keep it respectful.)

^^ ^^

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...