Jump to content
elmcitymaven

Reports: Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker dropping out of presidential race

 Share

11 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

WASHINGTON — Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker has decided to drop out of the presidential race, according to media reports.

The news was first reported by The New York Times.

The one-time Iowa front-runner has had trouble raising money as his support in polls has tanked in the past two months, and he no longer sees a viable path to the Republican nomination, three unnamed sources told The Times.

He is expected to announce his decision at a press conference in Madison, Wis., at 6 p.m. ET Monday.

The announcement comes one day after Walker registered the lowest support yet in a national poll. A CNN/ORC survey released Sunday found Walker was backed by less than 0.5% of those surveyed — statistically zero. That's down from 5% a few weeks earlier.

Walker's performance in the second Republican presidential debate last week was also widely criticized as lackluster, further hobbling his already faltering campaign.

Before the debate, a cadre of Walker supporters in his home state of Wisconsin urged the governor to be more genuine. They said he had modified his positions on issues to score political points, which undercut the very basis of his campaign -- that he was unintimidated by political fallout.

Walker had made taking on labor unions a cornerstone of his presidential bid, and union reaction to his decision to drop out was swift.

Richard Trumka, president of the AFL-CIO, tweeted that Walker "is still a disgrace, just no longer national."

The Wisconsin governor was one of five presidential candidates to draw early attention from the expansive political network controlled by the billionaire industrialists Charles Koch and David Koch. James Davis, a spokesman for the Koch-affiliated Freedom Partners Chamber of Commerce, praised Walker on Monday, but made it clear that the network has yet to settle on a Republican contender and may not do so.

“Gov. Walker has done some great things within his state,” Davis told USA TODAY. “He’s got a bright future in front of him.”

“We as a network are looking for individual candidates that have an optimistic message and support free-market reforms,” he added. “There are a number of candidates in the race that are talking about key issues that concern Americans.”

Stanley Hubbard, a Minnesota broadcasting magnate who was a top Walker contributor and is among the donors to the Koch network, said he’s disappointed that Walker failed to break through on the national stage.

Hubbard said the two have not spoken in recent days. He called Walker on Friday but had not heard back. “I imagine he was doing some soul-searching,” he said.

Despite his long-time support of Walker, Hubbard said he had donated to four other candidates whom he felt had strong debate performances last week: Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, businesswoman Carly Fiorina, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson. He said he no plans to settle on a single candidate anytime soon.

“I’m looking for a robust debate,” he said. “We’ll see who rises to the top.”

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2015/09/21/scott-walker-drops-out-2016-campaign/72580382/

giphy.gif

larissa-lima-says-who-is-against-the-que

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

The two candidates with the most executive experience are now out of the race.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Ireland
Timeline

He is a lousy governor. Most people from Wisconsin that I know can't wait until he leaves office.

Oct 19, 2010 I-130 application submitted to US Embassy Seoul, South Korea

Oct 22, 2010 I-130 application approved

Oct 22, 2010 packet 3 received via email

Nov 15, 2010 DS-230 part 1 faxed to US Embassy Seoul

Nov 15, 2010 Appointment for visa interview made on-line

Nov 16, 2010 Confirmation of appointment received via email

Dec 13, 2010 Interview date

Dec 15, 2010 CR-1 received via courier

Mar 29, 2011 POE Detroit Michigan

Feb 15, 2012 Change of address via telephone

Jan 10, 2013 I-751 packet mailed to Vermont Service CenterJan 15, 2013 NOA1

Jan 31, 2013 Biometrics appointment letter received

Feb 20, 2013 Biometric appointment date

June 14, 2013 RFE

June 24, 2013 Responded to RFE

July 24, 2013 Removal of conditions approved

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

What was meant is actual executive experience in government, which governors have but Senators & Congressmen don't.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was a loser. No energy. No fire. And clueless, too. You know he was a really bad governor of Minnesota, I mean Wisconsin, right? Everyone says that. No one likes the job he did.

Carly, you're next.


Please try not to bleed all over me like that lovely broad Megyn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And if she was President the illegal rapists would be safe too. Her wall would be tiny and feminine, if there even was a wall, which I doubt, seeing her tenure at HP where she did some really bad things, everyone says that, really bad things... my ball would be big and tall, did I say ball? I meant wall. My wall would be big and tall and I know how to do it too because I'm a builder. I got rich the old fashioned way, I built things. I have things to my name everywhere you go. Everywhere. I bet Carly even golfs at my courses, as long as she doesn't bleed all over them of course <guffaw>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And if she was President the illegal rapists would be safe too. Her wall would be tiny and feminine, if there even was a wall, which I doubt, seeing her tenure at HP where she did some really bad things, everyone says that, really bad things... my ball would be big and tall, did I say ball? I meant wall. My wall would be big and tall and I know how to do it too because I'm a builder. I got rich the old fashioned way, I built things. I have things to my name everywhere you go. Everywhere. I bet Carly even golfs at my courses, as long as she doesn't bleed all over them of course <guffaw>

http://www.medicinenet.com/male_menopause/article.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...