"I didn't stop and think about e-mail system"

[khwaidee1 196]

I don't know about you but, I would prefer a president who does stop and think. Just saying.

http://news.yahoo.com/clinton-didnt-stop-think-email-system-163911547--election.html

[Sousuke 1,214]

I don't know about you but, I would prefer a president who does stop and think. Just saying.

http://news.yahoo.com/clinton-didnt-stop-think-email-system-163911547--election.html

I agree. Hillary has no business running now IMO.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I have to ask, what was different about the Bush email scandal?

[khwaidee1 196]

I have to ask, what was different about the Bush email scandal?

He kept a private server too and had no idea how it worked and didn't stop and think about his e-mails? That, I don't remember.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Not him specifically, but a large number of staffers in the administration who had direct access to the President. Over 20 people would suggest deliberate practice...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy?wprov=sfia1

Responding to congressional demands for emails in connection with its investigation into the partisan firing of eight U.S. attorneys, the White House announced that as many as five million emails, covering a two-year span, had been lost.

The emails had been run through private accounts controlled by the Republican National Committee and were only supposed to be used for dealing with non-administration political campaign work to avoid violating ethics laws. Yet congressional investigators already had evidence private emails had been used for government business, including to discuss the firing of one of the U.S. attorneys. The RNC accounts were used by 22 White House staffers, including then-Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove, who reportedly used his RNC email for 95 percent of his communications.

Was anyone prosecuted and convicted for this? I don't recall. Edited September 4, 2015 by Trumplestiltskin

[-relo- 105]

Not him specifically,

/

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Well its like this. You can't be opposed to corruption if you only object to it when it's in your favour. If the previous administration were doing it en masse and with impunity, it should have been properly investigated and measures put in place to stop others from doing it.

Imagine that. You reap what you sow /

Edited September 4, 2015 by Trumplestiltskin

[-relo- 105]

Well its like this. If the previous administration were doing it, it should have been properly investigated and measures put in place to stop others from doing it.

Imagine that /

Not him specifically,

Well its like this. You can't be opposed to corruption if you only object to it when it's in your favour. If the previous administration were doing it en masse and with impunity, it should have been properly investigated and measures put in place to stop others from doing it.

Imagine that. You reap what you sow /

Not him specifically,

[Dashinka 25,315]

Never heard the issue with the Bush staffers, but I would like to see a little more evidence than something from Wikipedia. However, that is not the point here. If the Bush staffers broke the rules, then they should be prosecuted, but they are not running for president. This woman ignored the rules of her department and her boss.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/executive-order-classified-national-security-information

She will probably get away with it, but the American people would be idiots to elect her president. She cannot be trusted.

[khwaidee1 196]

She is an elitist that is above the law and holds herself out to be a working class hero concerned about "income inequality". I think she is a hypocrite, that she is above the law and more importantly that she knows what's best for us. I, for one, don't trust her. I don't think she has the country's best interests in mind.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Never heard the issue with the Bush staffers, but I would like to see a little more evidence than something from Wikipedia. However, that is not the point here. If the Bush staffers broke the rules, then they should be prosecuted, but they are not running for president. This woman ignored the rules of her department and her boss.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/executive-order-classified-national-security-information

She will probably get away with it, but the American people would be idiots to elect her president. She cannot be trusted.

That was a huge story back in 2007. Plenty of information out there about it. It did happen.

I don't think it's actually important who is in the frame. Running for president doesn't make it any less wrong than being president and presiding over an entire staff who did the same thing.

Edited September 4, 2015 by Trumplestiltskin

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

She is an elitist that is above the law and holds herself out to be a working class hero concerned about "income inequality". I think she is a hypocrite, that she is above the law and more importantly that she knows what's best for us. I, for one, don't trust her. I don't think she has the country's best interests in mind.

The political class are all elitists. Everyone you will ever vote for is a multi millionaire with fingers in many pies. They are all elitists. What makes one more trustworthy than another.

[decocker 7,198]

loving all this hillary bashing. BURY HUR.

[Expat1 971]

loving all this hillary bashing. BURY HUR.

Here ya go val.

[jyaku 138]

She's screwed the pooch for her family forever now.

People might forgive I landed under sniper fire but constant lying and making fun of the intelligence of the voting public is downright arrogant. That might win points in the Trump fan club but not democrats.

And the sad part is she's a DINO. And of all the Republicans running, she's the best and they would kill for her polling numbers.