Jump to content
KASH2011

N-400 August 2015 Filers

 Share

1,087 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Germany
Timeline

Thanks! The wait is really hard as everyone here can attest to.

Actually, it seems to be moving along fairly well fro most of us...just hope that trend continues for all others as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: India
Timeline

Good luck to everyone who have their interview dates.

Baltimore is one of the most slowest ones I have seen,

usual trend for Baltimore is FP +30 days in-line + 60 days Int letter + 30 days interview.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Lebanon
Timeline

Congrats everyone! :idea:

You should all be thankful to me! USCIS saw how critical I am of their lasiest bureaucrats :protest::ranting: , and decided to speed all you up to frustrate me more :devil:

But I am actually happy seeing so many of you are going to be sworn in citizens soon :joy:

From now on I shall post more critical stuff about USCIS, this may ensure you all get your Certificates sooner than you all hoped. :joy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0dQA0vMJxA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wquCCFvbNhI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5pdgyOzJtE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neqFpWDQ61w

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RneoccuJwY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTUU_ykQbfg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdi3Cg2Uq1k

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5HVJdMGAMs

==================================================

First Amendment and separation of Church from State has a lot more to it than most of our contemporaries realize.

The truth is, the Pilgrims were Puritan fascists who were only looking for their
own
religious freedom. They were too ... independent and fanatical even for the more mainstream zealots of English and European Reformations. They called themselves “Puritans” because they were dedicated to
purifying
the Church of England of Roman influences. They
hated
Rome and they
hated
heretics, and they
hated
sinners and they really hated
witches
. Their reigning English King, James I was also a foaming Protestant Scottish witch hunter, and was every bit as fanatical as the Pilgrims were, since they were all theological soul mates. But James I actually had to sophisticate himself a bit, particularly stifling his witch-hating fanaticism when he took power in England. He had to accommodate the more moderate and educated Protestantism that then still held great sway in his English Court and Parliament. This social moderation at home however, didn’t slow him from encouraging the exportation of sharp, Puritan zeal to his growing colonies in the New World though, where raw Puritanism would be free to dominate the new society he intended to found there.

I say with very little exaggeration, that living under Puritan rule in the New England American Colonies would be nearly as religiously oppressive as living under the Taliban in Afghanistan, or Wahhabi ruled Saudi Arabia. The principle difference between Sharia Law and Pilgrim Law would be that the Pilgrims let women show
puritan-whipping_thumb.jpg?w=244&h=244

their whole faces in public. the Puritans in particular on the other hand, weren’t all that put off by the Inquisition’s tactics or even goals in and of themselves. The Puritans and many other Reformers in truth just wanted the Inquisitional zeal applied unilaterally up and down the Church ranks from clergy to commoner. They just didn’t think you should be able to buy or politic your way out of being tortured into a confession of heresy. They figured that kings, Popes and bishops and priests were just as good candidates for heresy as anyone else—the more the merrier. Puritans in short, actually wanted
more
repression and
more
micromanaging of the Body of Christ. They wanted the power to institute the same sort of fanatical purification of Christendom that the Inquisition only
pretended
to enforce, and then only selectively, often for personal, social, or political reasons. The Puritans wanted their newly cleansed Protestant Inquistition to be
universally
applied to all Christians of whatever rank. The Puritans wanted
everyone
to be beaten into piety whatever his station in the Church or society– they just wanted to insure it was being done fairly and correctly by a dictatorial theocracy of their
own
design.We read about the Salem Witch trials, some decades after the Pilgrims landed, and think that hanging nineteen men and women as witches on the say-so of a couple of snotty little girls looking for attention was a fluke carried out by an isolated, small group of inbred fanatics. We think the old man they crushed under stones for refusing to submit to their trials was the result of some abnormal paranoia due to the bunker mentality of a pioneer colony in a harsh new land. When we read about the dozens of fellow colonists they just let rot in jail for months as they queued them up for their American Inquisition, we assume that this sort of fiendish treatment had to be the product of some sort of atypical mass mental illness brought about through a bad diet and not enough sunlight. But no,
that’s what Puritans did
.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGASvVqzOa0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Germany
Timeline

Thank you both!

N400, hopefully you're right that we all get them sooner...I would have hoped more would have gotten their interview letters by now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Guinea
Timeline

I'm expecting to receive the text tonight or tomorrow to be in-line for an interview (GC date is Nov 16). This wait is killing me. Best of luck to all of you who have received your interview dates. Knock em dead with your knowledge and such.

BTW, how many are planning on doing a name change? I'm still debating whether or not to do a name change. I know that if I do it, I have to do a judicial oath and not an administrative oath and I'm not sure if I want to wait. :)

Life is GREAT! SMILE! smile.png

I-130 Approved July 2013 (PD Dec 2011)

AOS DBVB

07/30/2013 - AOS packet sent via Express mail (I-485, I-131, I-765)

08/01/2013 (day 1) - Delivered to USCIS Chicago

08/06/2013 (day 6 ) - Received USCIS Acceptance Confirmation emails. Awaiting official receipt notice (Form I-797) in the mail.

08/08/2013 (day 8 ) - Checks cashed

08/10/2013 (day 10) - Received 3 NOA's by mail (I-485, I-131, I-765)

08/16/2013 (day 16 ) - NOA for Biometrics appointment. Date set for 08/28/2013

08/19/2013 (day 19) - Successful walk-in Biometrics

08/28/2013 (day 28) - Biometrics appointment (Original)

9/11/2013 (day 42) - I-485 status online changed to "testing & interview"

9/26/2013 (day 57) - EAD status online changed to "card production", I-131 approved.

9/30/2013 (day 61) - EAD/AP card production ordered

10/04/2013 (day 65) - EAD/AP card mailed

10/07/2013 (day 68) - EAD/AP card received. *USCIS spelling error on card so they will have to redo the card.

10/16/2013 (day 77) - EAD/AP card mailed back to USCIS due to USCIS spelling error on card.

11/23/2013 (day 115) - EAD/AP card received with correct name.

01/02/2014 (day 155) - I-485 status showing the interview date updated - Interview on Feb 4, 2014.

01/04/2014 (day 157 ) - Received NOA about the interview appointment on Feb 4, 2014

02/04/2014 (day 187) - Interview @ SLC

02/04/2014 (day 187) - I-485 Approved

02/13/2014 (day 197 ) - Green Card Received (10 Year GC)

--------------------------

Citizenship [bB]

08/17/2015 - N-400 packet sent via Express mail

08/19/2015 (day 2) - Delivered to USCIS Phoenix Lockbox

08/20/2015 (day 3) - Received USCIS Acceptance Confirmation emails. Awaiting official receipt notice (Form I-797) in the mail.

08/25/2015 (day 8) - Received NOA by mail

08/29/2015 (day 12) - NOA for Biometrics appointment. Date set for 09/08/2015

09/01/2015 (day 15) - Successful walk-in Biometrics @ a different location

12/17/2015 (day 123) - In line for interview

12/21/2015 (day 127) - Interview scheduled

12/24/2015 (day 130) - Interview letter received with interview date of Jan 27, 2016

01/27/2016 (day 164) - N400 Interview--Application approved.

02/07/2016 (day 175) - Oath ceremony letter arrived.Oath scheduled for 02/18/2016

02/18/2018 (day 186) - Oath ceremony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Cuba
Timeline

Hi all,

Those who have received their interview letters (congratulations, by the way): did you all receive an email informing you that your interview had been schedule prior to receiving the letter itself?

Thanks,

R.R.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Germany
Timeline

Hi all,

Those who have received their interview letters (congratulations, by the way): did you all receive an email informing you that your interview had been schedule prior to receiving the letter itself?

Thanks,

R.R.

Hey Rocky...yes, i recieved a text and email on 10/7 stating my application had been scheduled for an interview that day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Uganda
Timeline

Hi all,

Those who have received their interview letters (congratulations, by the way): did you all receive an email informing you that your interview had been schedule prior to receiving the letter itself?

Thanks,

R.R.

I received an email!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Kenya
Timeline

Hi all,

Those who have received their interview letters (congratulations, by the way): did you all receive an email informing you that your interview had been schedule prior to receiving the letter itself?

Thanks,

R.R.

I received an email and a text

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Lebanon
Timeline

Thank you both!

N400, hopefully you're right that we all get them sooner...I would have hoped more would have gotten their interview letters by now.

Best of luck to you !

They have to keep on hold at least some apps, to show they are doing something. Suppose they some day start working efficiently and process all applications on time, with no phony exuces to delay random cases.Guess what will then happen. The head of DHS will be brought to Congress and grilled for two hours by a Rep who will say he is on ISIS payroll.

I lived long enough to know how bureaucracy here works. :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0dQA0vMJxA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wquCCFvbNhI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5pdgyOzJtE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neqFpWDQ61w

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RneoccuJwY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTUU_ykQbfg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdi3Cg2Uq1k

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5HVJdMGAMs

==================================================

First Amendment and separation of Church from State has a lot more to it than most of our contemporaries realize.

The truth is, the Pilgrims were Puritan fascists who were only looking for their
own
religious freedom. They were too ... independent and fanatical even for the more mainstream zealots of English and European Reformations. They called themselves “Puritans” because they were dedicated to
purifying
the Church of England of Roman influences. They
hated
Rome and they
hated
heretics, and they
hated
sinners and they really hated
witches
. Their reigning English King, James I was also a foaming Protestant Scottish witch hunter, and was every bit as fanatical as the Pilgrims were, since they were all theological soul mates. But James I actually had to sophisticate himself a bit, particularly stifling his witch-hating fanaticism when he took power in England. He had to accommodate the more moderate and educated Protestantism that then still held great sway in his English Court and Parliament. This social moderation at home however, didn’t slow him from encouraging the exportation of sharp, Puritan zeal to his growing colonies in the New World though, where raw Puritanism would be free to dominate the new society he intended to found there.

I say with very little exaggeration, that living under Puritan rule in the New England American Colonies would be nearly as religiously oppressive as living under the Taliban in Afghanistan, or Wahhabi ruled Saudi Arabia. The principle difference between Sharia Law and Pilgrim Law would be that the Pilgrims let women show
puritan-whipping_thumb.jpg?w=244&h=244

their whole faces in public. the Puritans in particular on the other hand, weren’t all that put off by the Inquisition’s tactics or even goals in and of themselves. The Puritans and many other Reformers in truth just wanted the Inquisitional zeal applied unilaterally up and down the Church ranks from clergy to commoner. They just didn’t think you should be able to buy or politic your way out of being tortured into a confession of heresy. They figured that kings, Popes and bishops and priests were just as good candidates for heresy as anyone else—the more the merrier. Puritans in short, actually wanted
more
repression and
more
micromanaging of the Body of Christ. They wanted the power to institute the same sort of fanatical purification of Christendom that the Inquisition only
pretended
to enforce, and then only selectively, often for personal, social, or political reasons. The Puritans wanted their newly cleansed Protestant Inquistition to be
universally
applied to all Christians of whatever rank. The Puritans wanted
everyone
to be beaten into piety whatever his station in the Church or society– they just wanted to insure it was being done fairly and correctly by a dictatorial theocracy of their
own
design.We read about the Salem Witch trials, some decades after the Pilgrims landed, and think that hanging nineteen men and women as witches on the say-so of a couple of snotty little girls looking for attention was a fluke carried out by an isolated, small group of inbred fanatics. We think the old man they crushed under stones for refusing to submit to their trials was the result of some abnormal paranoia due to the bunker mentality of a pioneer colony in a harsh new land. When we read about the dozens of fellow colonists they just let rot in jail for months as they queued them up for their American Inquisition, we assume that this sort of fiendish treatment had to be the product of some sort of atypical mass mental illness brought about through a bad diet and not enough sunlight. But no,
that’s what Puritans did
.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGASvVqzOa0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Germany
Timeline

Best of luck to you !

They have to keep on hold at least some apps, to show they are doing something. Suppose they some day start working efficiently and process all applications on time, with no phony exuces to delay random cases.Guess what will then happen. The head of DHS will be brought to Congress and grilled for two hours by a Rep who will say he is on ISIS payroll.

I lived long enough to know how bureaucracy here works. :)

Thank you :)

I think we're all more than familiar with the Infamous Red Tape...lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Lebanon
Timeline

Hey guys and gals, just so everybody knows: there is no FBI Name Check on N-400 apps.

This is done when you apply for green card or travel document, but not when you apply for N-400.

In fact N-400 has total of 4 checks (unless USCIS decides to do more), and those are:

CBP TECS

DCII

DD214

DOJ FBI FIngerprint (not a name check)

CBP TECS is to check your border crossing records. DOJ FBI is self evident. I am not sure what DDII and DD214 checks are , but I think both are Defence Department related.

This only reinforces my earlier assumption that getting your interview notice late may have nothing to do with name check or real security concern.

Somehting as trivial as your FB being rejected by FBI (for poor quality) can delay your application for months, because once your app falls off conveyor and down through the cracks it's really like falling off the airplane over the Ocean.

Also, FBI , for all the blame it gets on delays, is actually very efficient organisation in comparison to USCIS,and I believe if N-400 were entirely handled by FBI there would less delays in Naturalization process.

Almost 2 months after my FP I have no change on my app status. Online case status still says "On XX XX XXXX we received your application for N-400....", not a single LUD since biometrics.

I am not one of those passive immigrants from cultures where people are used to perceive bureaucrats as Olympian Gods existing to have fun watching our misery while one humbly bows down to them in hopes of mercy. For all practical purposes, inside my head, I am American, and I look at government as entity which is there to serve and to protect us, not to randomly bully, intimidate and cause undue hardship to innocent people. I would take USCIS to Federal Court and sue it in no time, if I had a legal ground to do so. But, I guess they have to screw it really bad ,may be not send me an interview notice for the 6 months to a year after the cut off date their website reports as the date when the last case was processed by USCIS (or at least 15-18 months from now in Baltimore district). So, this means there is not much if anything I can do except uselessly getting myself frustrated dealing with an organisation which is less responsive to inquiry than a monumental stone wall.

I suggest those of you who visit this thread and are in similar situation like me share your experiences (almost two months after FP with no "in line to schedule interview", while almost everyone who had biometrics after had their status change, with some already scheduled or already having gone to interview).

Best,

N400Applicant

Edited by N400applicant

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0dQA0vMJxA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wquCCFvbNhI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5pdgyOzJtE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neqFpWDQ61w

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RneoccuJwY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTUU_ykQbfg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdi3Cg2Uq1k

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5HVJdMGAMs

==================================================

First Amendment and separation of Church from State has a lot more to it than most of our contemporaries realize.

The truth is, the Pilgrims were Puritan fascists who were only looking for their
own
religious freedom. They were too ... independent and fanatical even for the more mainstream zealots of English and European Reformations. They called themselves “Puritans” because they were dedicated to
purifying
the Church of England of Roman influences. They
hated
Rome and they
hated
heretics, and they
hated
sinners and they really hated
witches
. Their reigning English King, James I was also a foaming Protestant Scottish witch hunter, and was every bit as fanatical as the Pilgrims were, since they were all theological soul mates. But James I actually had to sophisticate himself a bit, particularly stifling his witch-hating fanaticism when he took power in England. He had to accommodate the more moderate and educated Protestantism that then still held great sway in his English Court and Parliament. This social moderation at home however, didn’t slow him from encouraging the exportation of sharp, Puritan zeal to his growing colonies in the New World though, where raw Puritanism would be free to dominate the new society he intended to found there.

I say with very little exaggeration, that living under Puritan rule in the New England American Colonies would be nearly as religiously oppressive as living under the Taliban in Afghanistan, or Wahhabi ruled Saudi Arabia. The principle difference between Sharia Law and Pilgrim Law would be that the Pilgrims let women show
puritan-whipping_thumb.jpg?w=244&h=244

their whole faces in public. the Puritans in particular on the other hand, weren’t all that put off by the Inquisition’s tactics or even goals in and of themselves. The Puritans and many other Reformers in truth just wanted the Inquisitional zeal applied unilaterally up and down the Church ranks from clergy to commoner. They just didn’t think you should be able to buy or politic your way out of being tortured into a confession of heresy. They figured that kings, Popes and bishops and priests were just as good candidates for heresy as anyone else—the more the merrier. Puritans in short, actually wanted
more
repression and
more
micromanaging of the Body of Christ. They wanted the power to institute the same sort of fanatical purification of Christendom that the Inquisition only
pretended
to enforce, and then only selectively, often for personal, social, or political reasons. The Puritans wanted their newly cleansed Protestant Inquistition to be
universally
applied to all Christians of whatever rank. The Puritans wanted
everyone
to be beaten into piety whatever his station in the Church or society– they just wanted to insure it was being done fairly and correctly by a dictatorial theocracy of their
own
design.We read about the Salem Witch trials, some decades after the Pilgrims landed, and think that hanging nineteen men and women as witches on the say-so of a couple of snotty little girls looking for attention was a fluke carried out by an isolated, small group of inbred fanatics. We think the old man they crushed under stones for refusing to submit to their trials was the result of some abnormal paranoia due to the bunker mentality of a pioneer colony in a harsh new land. When we read about the dozens of fellow colonists they just let rot in jail for months as they queued them up for their American Inquisition, we assume that this sort of fiendish treatment had to be the product of some sort of atypical mass mental illness brought about through a bad diet and not enough sunlight. But no,
that’s what Puritans did
.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGASvVqzOa0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...