Jump to content

297 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Other Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted

Actually, as mentioned previously in this thread, a bakery in Dearborn MI refused a cake for a homosexual wedding. No outrage, no shut-down, no gofundmesite. So I guess discrimination exists elsewhere.

If you thought I was implying that discrimination only exists in Indiana then I apologize. However by passing this law they have opened themselves up to the ridicule and charges of discrimination that go along with it. There are already states that are following Indiana's lead and the circus will go on until the inevitable smackdown from the supreme court.

QCjgyJZ.jpg

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

Besides, gay marriage isn't legal in Michigan so the owners of THAT bakery could conceivably claim that they were refusing to participate in an illegal act, if pressed.

Met in 2010 on a forum for a mutual interest. Became friends.
2011: Realized we needed to evaluate our status as friends when we realized we were talking about raising children together.

2011/2012: Decided we were a couple sometime in, but no possibility of being together due to being same sex couple.

June 26, 2013: DOMA overturned. American married couples ALL have the same federal rights at last! We can be a family!

June-September, 2013: Discussion about being together begins.

November 13, 2013: Meet in person to see if this could work. It's perfect. We plan to elope to Boston, MA.

March 13, 2014 Married!

May 9, 2014: Petition mailed to USCIS

May 12, 2014: NOA1.
October 27, 2014: NOA2. (5 months, 2 weeks, 1 day after NOA1)
October 31, 2014: USCIS ships file to NVC (five days after NOA2) Happy Halloween for us!

November 18, 2014: NVC receives our case (22 days after NOA2)

December 17, 2014: NVC generates case number (50 days after NOA2)

December 19, 2014: Receive AOS bill, DS-261. Submit DS-261 (52 days after NOA2)

December 20, 2014: Pay AOS Fee

January 7, 2015: Receive, pay IV Fee

January 10, 2015: Complete DS-260

January 11, 2015: Send AOS package and Civil Documents
March 23, 2015: Case Complete at NVC. (70 days from when they received docs to CC)

May 6, 2015: Interview at Montréal APPROVED!

May 11, 2015: Visa in hand! One year less one day from NOA1.

Filed: Other Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted (edited)

http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/05/politics/religious-freedom-gay-rights-santorum-dolan/index.html

Rick Santorum still doesn't get it. I remember a time when stupidity wasn't considered a virtue.

"If you're a print shop and you are a gay man, should you be forced to print 'God hates ****' for the Westboro Baptist Church because they hold those signs up?" Santorum said.
Edited by Dakine10

QCjgyJZ.jpg

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

If the business owner said he used horse meat in the pizza, there would be a backlash, he would lose customer support, and he would go out of business. There would not be a gofundme account set up.

In this actual case, because of his actions, he was going to face going out of business because of diminished customer support. The difference was that he got a lot of support based solely on his discriminatory position.

I don't feel comfortable guessing at the political affiliation of those who donated. I don't know if they are liberal or conservative. I don't know if they are religious or atheist. I don't know if they are black and white. I am comfortable saying they are bigots.

I think cases like this are a barometer of what is acceptable to say in a public setting. Free speech is free, but it isn't without consequence - especially when the statements in question trample on the rights of others. I just don't see why anyone running a business and dealing with the general public would want to invite this sort of controversy - it's just stupid.

I always remember the case of the racist baker from Brooklyn about 7 years ago - a man who just after Obama got elected started selling 'drunken negro head cookies' in his shop and then insisting that he wasn't being racist (before suggesting that he hoped that Obama goes 'the same way as Lincoln'. The story ended up with a protest by a chapter of the Black Panthers and a visit by the Secret Service for threats against the President. Like something Larry David would come up with.

Filed: Other Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted

I think cases like this are a barometer of what is acceptable to say in a public setting. Free speech is free, but it isn't without consequence - especially when the statements in question trample on the rights of others. I just don't see why anyone running a business and dealing with the general public would want to invite this sort of controversy - it's just stupid.

I always remember the case of the racist baker from Brooklyn about 7 years ago - a man who just after Obama got elected started selling 'drunken negro head cookies' in his shop and then insisting that he wasn't being racist (before suggesting that he hoped that Obama goes 'the same way as Lincoln'. The story ended up with a protest by a chapter of the Black Panthers and a visit by the Secret Service for threats against the President. Like something Larry David would come up with.

If there was a gofundme page setup, I'm sure there would be a lineup of hypocrites who were only supporting free speech.

QCjgyJZ.jpg

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted (edited)

If there was a gofundme page setup, I'm sure there would be a lineup of hypocrites who were only supporting free speech.

I think some people are genuinely ignorant of their own prejudices. Others also misunderstand the situation - usually because they are reliant on second hand information (e.g. your news commentary and talk radio shows). As an example, during the 2008/9 election I was watching TV with my ex-MIL and saw her take a position on Proposition 8 (to effectively ban gay marriage in CA) based solely on a 30 second TV commercial. Her and her daughter had a big row about it because the daughter was obviously pro-gay marriage and her parents weren't. What I found interesting was the arguments my MIL used to support her position were almost word for word the same as what I had heard in the TV commercials.

I don't believe that she was bigoted as much as she just hadn't thought the arguments through. The 'victim' in her view was not the unnamed (out of sight, out of mind) thousands who would be marginalised, but rather the local town churches who she thought would be bound by law to perform religious services against their beliefs (in point of fact, this would not have been the case at all).

Edited by Venkman
Filed: Other Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted

I think some people are genuinely ignorant of their own prejudices. Others also misunderstand the situation - usually because they are reliant on second hand information (e.g. your news commentary and talk radio shows). As an example, during the 2008/9 election I was watching TV with my ex-MIL and saw her take a position on Proposition 8 (to effectively ban gay marriage in CA) based solely on a 30 second TV commercial. Her and her daughter had a big row about it because the daughter was obviously pro-gay marriage and her parents weren't. What I found interesting was the arguments my MIL used to support her position were almost word for word the same as what I had heard in the TV commercials.

I don't believe that she was bigoted as much as she just hadn't thought the arguments through. The 'victim' in her view was not the unnamed (out of sight, out of mind) thousands who would be marginalised, but rather the local town churches who she thought would be bound by law to perform religious services against their beliefs (in point of fact, this would not have been the case at all).

Defenders of slavery argued (genuinely) that freeing the slaves would lead to widespread unemployment. I agree many are unaware of their own prejudices. It's never an excuse. They are still prejudiced.

QCjgyJZ.jpg

Posted

The definition of bigotry you gave pretty much says everyone is a bigot. If you are intolerant of anyone, even someone you identify as a bigot based on their religious or political beliefs and this definition, then you are also a bigot. Or did I mis-interpet this.

Sorry for the late posting, back to work. Being a bigot means you're discriminating against someone based on one of the above mentioned factors. If someone is racist towards me, I have a right to refuse them service if they're in my office. But you can't refuse service based because they're gay, black, or anything else. Not to mention, catering a gay wedding isn't the same as participating in a homosexual act. Not even close.

Marvin gets the famous pass . He has said so himself on here . I will admit I am a bigot .

Admitting you have a problem is the first step. Maybe you will seek treatment for it...

“Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated.” – Coretta Scott King

"Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge." -Toni Morrison

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it.

Martin Luther King, Jr.

President-Obama-jpg.jpg

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...