46% of November cases have NOA2

[declee 0]

As a one-week update to this post:

40% of November cases have NOA2

It is now 46%. This is less than one (VJ) case per day.

The November cases certainly are not close to finishing, as was speculated in another thread a few days ago. I should note that the TOTAL number of November cases also increased since I compiled the original summary. Thus, a few more November people decided to register their case info at VJ.

Finally, it is still true that NO December cases (here) have advanced past the NOA2 hurdle.

Sit tight, all

[payxibka 10,045]

Finally, it is still true that NO December cases (here) have advanced past the NOA2 hurdle.

It is not true, many if not most of the December VSC filed cases have advanced to or past NOA2.

Edited February 7, 2007 by fwaguy

[declee 0]

Finally, it is still true that NO December cases (here) have advanced past the NOA2 hurdle.

It is not true, many if not most of the December VSC filed cases have advanced to or past NOA2.

Read the original thread, please.

[Augustajim 0]

I know I'm ready for it to speed up. The faster NOA2 gets here the sooner the petition can sit on the mail room floor for three months in China while the approiate amount of mold grows on it.

[payxibka 10,045]

Finally, it is still true that NO December cases (here) have advanced past the NOA2 hurdle.

It is not true, many if not most of the December VSC filed cases have advanced to or past NOA2.

Read the original thread, please.

I did re-read the post... My comment still stands.

[declee 0]

Finally, it is still true that NO December cases (here) have advanced past the NOA2 hurdle.

It is not true, many if not most of the December VSC filed cases have advanced to or past NOA2.

Read the original thread, please.

I did re-read the post... My comment still stands.

During your reading, which part of "excludes the Vermont data" confused you the most?

Stop posting for the sake of intruding in every possible thread. It's transparent and annoying.

[brnidokiegurl 0]

Maybe its the word HERE thats confusing, Here as in calif, here as in VJ? no reason to say intruding when we are all in the same boat of waiting.

[payxibka 10,045]

During your reading, which part of "excludes the Vermont data" confused you the most?

Stop posting for the sake of intruding in every possible thread. It's transparent and annoying.

Get a clue... I am a NOVEMBER FILER...

Edited February 7, 2007 by fwaguy

[declee 0]

Maybe its the word HERE thats confusing

Cases here refers to cases registered here at VJ; as ALL of these summaries, tables, etc., are limited to the data from people who just happen to register their information at VJ. Most of us understand this implicitly; some need to be reminded.

Again, the original thread is clear enough, and this new thread merely updates the numbers. There is no need for repetitoin here; you only need to refer to the thread that is cited.

Hope this is clear

[brnidokiegurl 0]

Thank you and most of us UNDERSTAND who and where our help usually comes from. Again thank you for your effort and words.

[declee 0]

During your reading, which part of "excludes the Vermont data" confused you the most?

Stop posting for the sake of intruding in every possible thread. It's transparent and annoying.

Get a clue... I am a NOVEMBER FILER...

And your point is, what?

That you now realize this has nothing to do with the Vermont data, but since you're a November filer, the Vermont data is magically made relevant?

Give it a rest. You are confused and are doing nothing but diverting the topic.

HERE, LET ME MAKE IT EASIER FOR YOU : I AM NOT PARTICULARLY INTERESTED IN THE VERMONT DATA (FOR REASONS WHICH WILL ONLY CONFUSE YOU FURTHER), BUT IF YOU HAVE AN INTEREST IN THE VERMONT DATA (OR ANY COMBINATION OF DATA), THEN START YOUR OWN THREAD TO SHARE YOUR FINDINGS.

[payxibka 10,045]

I have never taken exception to your November data... If you read my first post I was referring to your statement regarding December. You have lost focus ....

A clip of your original statement: (highlights added for clarification)

December (and January) filers (A global call to all filers) might be interested to know that 40% of the cases created in November, 2006 are now past the NOA2 hurdle. This summary (for November) ignores the Vermont data; it applies to CSC, NSC and TSC cases--all of which are processed through CSC.

[declee 0]

A clip of your original statement: (highlights added for clarification)

December (and January) filers (A global call to all filers) might be interested to know that 40% of the cases created in November, 2006 are now past the NOA2 hurdle. This summary (for November) ignores the Vermont data; it applies to CSC, NSC and TSC cases--all of which are processed through CSC.

Now this is sad. Because even when you try to be careful you are ridiculous.

If you don't mind me saying, your first highlight (which is arrogant pressumption, since you are not the author) seems a bit retarded and pointless. I mean, first of all, you are certainly the only one here who is able to get "global call to all filers" from the words 'December' and 'January'. Second, this poor interpretation is itself irrelevant here. It doesn't explain why you 'forgot' that the original thread does NOT speak to the Vermont data.

Keep trying, though. I'm sure if you study that post long enough, you will find some excuse to help you save face.

However, you were supposed to study it BEFORE you so quickly posted your reply--not after.

Again, stop hijacking this thread with your rantings. If you do not, then I will return the favor.

[brnidokiegurl 0]

Excuse me but your being a tad rude, did you not just join? Again we are all waiting for the same thing, some of us closer than others and it is a little nerve racking and tense times, calm down or your not going to make it, all this ranting proves nothing. Differences of opinions and ways of calculating and seeing things will differ, in the end same results.

[declee 0]

Excuse me but your being a tad rude, did you not just join? Again we are all waiting for the same thing, some of us closer than others and it is a little nerve racking and tense times, calm down or your not going to make it, all this ranting proves nothing. Differences of opinions and ways of calculating and seeing things will differ, in the end same results.

Umm, there is no difference of opinion. Please learn to discriminate.

And this has nothing to do with me waiting or 'making it'.

When I joined is also irrelevant. What an arrogant comment to make.

None of this changes the information originally posted. And THAT is the point of the thread. At least two of you require excessive hand-holding, and I will leave you to your own devices.