Jump to content

25 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Country: Mexico
Timeline
Posted

I dont think you are the first one writting a tread here pretending to be the other spouse, actually i think it happens too often, but you are the first I see accepting you did it. If you sent your information to ICE or/and USCIS i guess you are done. I also recommend you to move on.

K

Meet 12/2000; Married 01/2004; AOS 01/2005; R-C 07/2007; Citizen 06/2008
In love for 14 years and happily counting...

Posted

Yes I have,and I may send more proof of infidelity

You should drop it off with an FDNS officer at the local USCIS office, getting in on an INFOPASS appointment.

Talk with that FDNS officer, go over all, and IF the FDNS officer warrants there was fraud, then a record of this will get into her A-File.

When she applies for ROC or AOS, the A-File is reviewed. A finding of fraud from a FDNS officer trumps most stuff, her case will be denied.

You already did your part.

Done with K1, AOS and ROC

Filed: Country: Monaco
Timeline
Posted

Well, the good thing is that you're divorced and no longer responsible for her except by the conditions and terms of the I-864. Her situation in this country is now a matter between her and the USCIS. You need not worry about it anymore.

Yes I have,and I may send more proof of infidelity

200px-FSM_Logo.svg.png


www.ffrf.org




Filed: Timeline
Posted

As I understand it, a second marriage should not affect the green card resulting from the first marriage.

I'm sure that like anything, a lot of money spent on good lawyers will usually result in a better outcome than would result from lack of expert legal advice.

However, the GC from the first marriage must be adjudicated based on that marriage. If it is denied, it is virtually impossible to get a GC based on a subsequent marriage. You basically have to show that USCIS erred in the first denial. You cannot say 'Well I didn't marry the first time in good faith, but I really did this time, honest!"

There is no single "bright line" test for what constitutes marriage fraud. USCIS will still come back to the question, did the immigrant seeing status have a good faith intention to establish a bona fide marital relationship at the time of marriage? Other information is indicative, but not conclusive.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted

I will give you my two cents worth. The same thing happened to me. My wife had two boyfriends in two weeks of arriving in USA. One was a lawyer she had met on a cupid site before she left her native country. The other was a Mexican national with US citizenship. I had evidence of e-mails, chat sessions from computer, personal signed notes and letters. Photos of infedelity and vacations with one of the men to Mexico. The lawyer gave her $2000 to get a divorce. (Which I think she returned). One of the men even made her pregnant but there was complications. The wife filed a restraining order against me.. The case was thrown out of court. The judge saw right through what she was doing to stay in USA. I was granted a divorce. I turned everything in to the fraud unit and and the ex-wife was not deported. I have no idea why. I never heard from immigration. She kept her green card. My ex-wife met another man and re-married. She is now a US citizen. IT WAS PURE FRAUD ON HER PART. SHE HAD NO ENTINSIONS OF STAYING WITH ME. I found out later, she had help and coaching from a friend in the government of Colombia. So fraud or not, it depends on what immigration wants to do.

06-10-2008I-130 sent Chicago lock box

10-16-2008 (NOA1)Received Calif service center

10-19-2008 (touch)

10-25-2008 (NOA2) I-130 approval sent to NVC

02-10-2009 Interview

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

Sometimes I see these posts and my pressure just goes up because there are some really good people and families trying to do right and get here the right way and the government makes it so hard yet, you have those that marry just to get a GC and come to America....then go their merrily way... smh! Families are being broken and separated for years, people giving their everything to unite with their spouses or children then....you have those...seekers...smh!

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

So many people try to get to the USA by what ever visa, legally, and 99% with legit intentions, and being here 2 months and seeking or have a divorce, says many things that need not be said. I wish you well, IF this is just a "bad" situation..,.,.,.,

But, you have raised many huge "RED FLAGS" and I believe you need a really good immigration attorney!

But, as I wish all people well, good luck, God will sort it out!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

A great many inappropriate posts have been removed. The OP has enough valid information in order to proceed. This thread is closed to further comment and is not to be reopened, and its drama is not to be transported into other threads.

VJ Moderation

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...