Jump to content
luckytxn

Obama’s Class Warfare

 Share

138 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Country: Vietnam
Timeline

Nice little commentary to start the day.

The American economy is finally coming back, after one of the slowest post-recession recoveries in recent history. So naturally President Obama has decided that what we really need now is a return to the era of tax and spend. Oh, and of course, a healthy batch of class warfare too.

The president wants to junk the sequester caps that have been largely responsible for reducing our estimated deficit from $1 trillion a year to a more manageable but still sizable $469 billion this year. He would increase discretionary spending for next year by $68 billion above the spending caps enacted in 2011, with the increases roughly split between defense and non-defense spending. If these increases are enacted, discretionary spending would increase roughly 7 percent from this year to next, compared with average growth of 4 percent from 2004 to 2013.

Link: http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/obamas-class-warfare#vyrboc:c1w

Edited by luckytxn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline

Yeah funnily enough is never the rich so complain about it. It's always a strata of middle America that feels the need to stop any mud from splashing onto the rich.

Heaven forbid anyone takes a swipe at rich tax dodgers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice little commentary to start the day.

The American economy is finally coming back, after one of the slowest post-recession recoveries in recent history.

What does this even mean? How many recessions have we had "in recent history", and what exactly qualifies as "recent history"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

We'll start making progress once the trickle down followers realize that trickle down has and continues to hurt the US economy. An economy that largely relies on consumers to spend cannot thrive when 95% of consumers have ever less to spend. It's really not that hard to understand. As long as income and wealth inequality increases, every recovery will be slower and weaker than the previous one. Eventually, there will be no recovery and we'll have the next depression. Not a question of whether it'll happen given the increasing income and wealth inequality but a question of when. We could do something about it, of course, but given the political climate, we most certainly won't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What ever the bought and paid for media says it means.

When an article starts off with a sentence that makes absolutely no sense, chances are the rest of the article will follow suit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When an article starts off with a sentence that makes absolutely no sense, chances are the rest of the article will follow suit.

if you're reading an article from the cato institute, chances are you've already wasted time you won't get back

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if you're reading an article from the cato institute, chances are you've already wasted time you won't get back

I'm sure the article was the result of a Google fishing expedition. The search criteria was probably something like: "I hate Obama".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline

When an article starts off with a sentence that makes absolutely no sense, chances are the rest of the article will follow suit.

As someone with some experience as a journalist, if the point the author is trying to make isn't clear in the first paragraph you can be assured that the rest of it is cack too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

What does this even mean? How many recessions have we had "in recent history", and what exactly qualifies as "recent history"?

We had two. One at the onset of Bush's Presidency and one at the onset of Obama's Presidency. And contrary to what right wingers would have you believe, the slowest and weakest recovery was not that which Obama presided over. It was the other one. At no point during the previous administration were nearly as many private sector jobs created as have been created since 2009.

blog_private_employment_2001_vs_2010.jpg

I'm sure everyone has heard this before but - Class Warfare has been going on for 30 years and 99% of America has been losing.

#fact

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had two. One at the onset of Bush's Presidency and one at the onset of Obama's Presidency. And contrary to what right wingers would have you believe, the slowest and weakest recovery was not that which Obama presided over. It was the other one. At no point during the previous administration were nearly as many private sector jobs created as have been created since 2009.

blog_private_employment_2001_vs_2010.jpg

#fact

Thanks for the clarification and reinforcing that the article in the op is full of shyte.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Ireland
Timeline

We had two. One at the onset of Bush's Presidency and one at the onset of Obama's Presidency. And contrary to what right wingers would have you believe, the slowest and weakest recovery was not that which Obama presided over. It was the other one. At no point during the previous administration were nearly as many private sector jobs created as have been created since 2009.

blog_private_employment_2001_vs_2010.jpg

#fact

This can't possibly be correct. Bush II cut taxes, and everyone knows lower taxes equals a stronger economy.

Oct 19, 2010 I-130 application submitted to US Embassy Seoul, South Korea

Oct 22, 2010 I-130 application approved

Oct 22, 2010 packet 3 received via email

Nov 15, 2010 DS-230 part 1 faxed to US Embassy Seoul

Nov 15, 2010 Appointment for visa interview made on-line

Nov 16, 2010 Confirmation of appointment received via email

Dec 13, 2010 Interview date

Dec 15, 2010 CR-1 received via courier

Mar 29, 2011 POE Detroit Michigan

Feb 15, 2012 Change of address via telephone

Jan 10, 2013 I-751 packet mailed to Vermont Service CenterJan 15, 2013 NOA1

Jan 31, 2013 Biometrics appointment letter received

Feb 20, 2013 Biometric appointment date

June 14, 2013 RFE

June 24, 2013 Responded to RFE

July 24, 2013 Removal of conditions approved

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...