1 of Mark Wahlberg's victims says he shouldn't be pardoned

[Janelle2002 3,865]

1 of Mark Wahlberg's victims says he shouldn't be pardoned

By PHILIP MARCELO and RODRIQUE NGOWI 8 minutes ago

.

View gallery

• 
  .
• 
  .
• 
  .

BOSTON (AP) — A victim of one of Mark Wahlberg's racially motivated attacks as a teenage delinquent in segregated Boston in the 1980s insists he shouldn't be granted a pardon for his crimes.

Kristyn Atwood was among a group of mostly black fourth-grade students on a field trip to the beach in 1986 when Wahlberg and his white friends began hurling rocks and shouting racial epithets as they chased them down the street.

"I don't think he should get a pardon," Atwood, now 38 and living in Decatur, Georgia, said in an interview with The Associated Press.

"I don't really care who he is. It doesn't make him any exception. If you're a racist, you're always going to be a racist. And for him to want to erase it I just think it's wrong," she said.

Mary Belmonte, the white teacher who brought the students to the neighborhood beach that day, sees things differently. "I believe in forgiveness," she said. "He was just a young kid — a punk — in the mean streets of Boston. He didn't do it specifically because he was a bad kid. He was just a follower doing what the other kids were doing."

The 43-year-old former rapper, Calvin Klein model and "Boogie Nights" actor wants official forgiveness for a separate, more severe attack in 1988, in which he assaulted two Vietnamese men while trying to steal beer. That attack sent one of the men to the hospital and landed Wahlberg in prison.

View gallery

In this Dec. 15, 2014 photo, Mary Belmonte reviews newspaper clippings she had collected about Mark …

Wahlberg, in a pardon application filed in November and pending before the state parole board, acknowledges he was a teenage delinquent mixed up in drugs, alcohol and the wrong crowd. He points to his ensuing successful acting career, restaurant ventures and philanthropic work with inner city youths as evidence he's turned his life around.

"I have apologized, many times," he told the AP in December. "The first opportunity I had to apologize was right there in court when all the dust had settled and I was getting shackled and taken away, and making sure I paid my debt to society and continue to try and do things that make up for the mistakes that I've made."

Court documents in the 1986 attack identify Wahlberg among a group of white boys who harassed the school group as they were leaving Savin Hill Beach in Dorchester, a mixed but segregated Boston neighborhood that had seen racial tensions during the years the city was under court-ordered school integration.

The boys chased the black children down the street, repeatedly shouting "n-----" and hurling rocks until an ambulance driver intervened. Wahlberg was 15 at the time.

Atwood says she still bears a scar from getting hit by a rock. No one was seriously injured, but the attack left a lasting impression.

View gallery

In this Dec. 15, 2014 photo, Mary Belmonte speaks during an interview at her home in Westwood, Mass, …

"I was really scared. My heart was beating fast. I couldn't believe it was happening. The names. The rocks. The kids chasing," Belmonte told the AP.

Wahlberg and two other white youths were issued a civil rights injunction: essentially a stern warning that if they committed another hate crime, they would be sent to jail.

In 1988, Wahlberg, then 16, attacked two Vietnamese men while trying to steal beer near his Dorchester home.

According to the sentencing memorandum, he confronted Thanh Lam, a Vietnamese man, as he was getting out of his car with two cases of beer. Wahlberg called Lam a "Vietnam f------ s---" and beat him over the head with a 5-foot wooden stick until Lam lost consciousness and the rod broke in two.

Documents say Wahlberg ran up to another Vietnamese man, Hoa Trinh, and asked for help hiding. After a police cruiser drove past, he punched Trinh in the eye. Later, he made crude remarks about Asians.

View gallery

FILE - In this Jan. 13, 2015 file photo, Judith Beals, a former prosecutor in the Massachusetts atto …

Wahlberg ultimately was convicted as an adult of two counts of assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, marijuana possession and criminal contempt for violating the prior civil rights injunction. He was given a three-month prison sentence, of which he served about 45 days.

Trinh declined to be interviewed by AP, and efforts to locate Lam were unsuccessful.

Judith Beals, a former state prosecutor involved in the cases, said Wahlberg's crimes stand out because he violated the injunction with an even more violent attack on people of yet another race.

"It was a hate crime and that's exactly what should be on his record forever," Atwood said.

___

http://news.yahoo.com/mark-wahlbergs-victims-divided-over-pardon-request-065151453.html

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

"I don't really care who he is. It doesn't make him any exception. If you're a racist, you're always going to be a racist. And for him to want to erase it I just think it's wrong," she said.

Definitely a most encompassing standard, even more so, than just being a racist when you believe in racism and commit racist acts at the time when, say, you were serving as the Senate Majority Leader, or a President of the United States.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I think people can change and I don't buy this idea that "once a racist always a racist".

I think there's a difference between someone who did something during their youth and someone like Mel Gibson, who seems to have deeply ingrained prejudices.

Edited January 20, 2015 by Hail Ming!

[JohnR! 5,495]

I think we're all racists in the sense we perceive differences in color of skin or physical features. The difference is that some of us attribute these to the result of evolution and see nothing more than that on these differences, while others resort to constructs to justify their intolerance to those whom they perceive as different.

Mel Gibson obviously falls in the latter category...

I think people can change and I don't buy this idea that "once a racist always a racist".

I think there's a difference between someone who did something during their youth and someone like Mel Gibson, who seems to have deeply ingrained prejudices.