White House: Obama Will Fight Media To Stop Anti-Jihad Articles

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

President Barack Obama has a moral responsibility to push back on the nation’s journalism community when it is planning to publish anti-jihadi articles that might cause a jihadi attack against the nation’s defenses forces, the White House’s press secretary said Jan. 12.

“The president … will not now be shy about expressing a view or taking the steps that are necessary to try to advocate for the safety and security of our men and women in uniform” whenever journalists’ work may provoke jihadist attacks, spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters at the White House’s daily briefing.

http://dailycaller.com/2015/01/13/white-house-obama-will-fight-media-to-stop-anti-jihad-articles/

Tough call. Maybe if we bring everybody home and just ignore the problem, it will no longer affect us. I think that was Obama's original plan.

[LibCampFireClub 635]

Damn the first amendment full speed ahead

Damn the first amendment full speed ahead

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

A déjà vu is usually a glitch in the Matrix

[Janelle2002 3,865]

His idea is correct but he is doing it for the wrong reason. We should not promote hate and biased ideas against people of any religion or color. All Muslims should not have to suffer because of what someone they are unrelated to thinks.

[Darnell 8,478]

His idea is correct but he is doing it for the wrong reason. We should not promote hate and biased ideas against people of any religion or color. All Muslims should not have to suffer because of what someone they are unrelated to thinks.

I'm still waiting for the 90 percent of Imams that not want jihad,

to actually stand up and say something to that effect.

[VJ_Messiah 22]

Barack Hussein Obama has spoken.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

I'm still waiting for the 90 percent of Imams that not want jihad,

to actually stand up and say something to that effect.

However, religion is supposed to be welcoming, so out of nature for a religion to expel or discipline its own. There is always hope for redemption. Love the sinner, hate the sin, and all that.

[VJ_Messiah 22]

However, religion is supposed to be welcoming, so out of nature for a religion to expel or discipline its own. There is always hope for redemption. Love the sinner, hate the sin, and all that.

I believe you misread his post. He said he was waiting for Imams to stand up and say something against Jihad. He never once mentioned expel or disciplining in her post.

Edited January 14, 2015 by VJ_Messiah

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

He said he was waiting for Imams to stand up and say something against Jihad.

Jihad is probably not the right word, although it continues to be misused. Carry on.

Edited January 14, 2015 by I AM NOT THAT GUY

[Janelle2002 3,865]

I'm still waiting for the 90 percent of Imams that not want jihad,

to actually stand up and say something to that effect.

A Jihad is a struggle for one's self, not a war against others. You should learn what Jihad really means. Propagandists want people to believe it is a war against non-believers to make you run scared.

[Darnell 8,478]

hey - come on - the WH Admin is being mum,

why can't the Imams stand up instead?

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

hey - come on - the WH Admin is being mum,

why can't the Imams stand up instead?

I agree, more could be done to "clarify" what constitutes a religion of peace, and what does not.

[Darnell 8,478]

A Jihad is a struggle for one's self, not a war against others. You should learn what Jihad really means. Propagandists want people to believe it is a war against non-believers to make you run scared.

ya, ok - i'll give ya that one, cause yer mostly correct.

however, in the 0.0048872 percent of usage, it really means to 'kill the infidel, those who will not convert'

and it's that form o Jihad that these Islamic Terrorists use.

[Janelle2002 3,865]

ya, ok - i'll give ya that one, cause yer mostly correct.

however, in the 0.0048872 percent of usage, it really means to 'kill the infidel, those who will not convert'

and it's that form o Jihad that these Islamic Terrorists use.

So because someone chooses to use it incorrectly it makes it correct?

[Darnell 8,478]

no. it's that form that gets labelled 'Terrorism' ...

correct? I ain't seeking correctness here.

If I was, then I'd be asking that the Imams and Mullahs EXPLAIN jihad instead of condemming the Islamic Terrorists.