Jump to content

3,033 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline
Posted

Steve - I think Brat's plan for a MS in Singpura is useful ONLY if she is to remain in Singapura,

as

it's very specific to Singapura and not easily translatable into USA stuff. She'll learn a lot about law and beauracracy and whatnots, all specific to Singapura, not specific knowledge to use in the USA.

I don't care where she goes - I was only suggesting to remain near the husband, share a bed nightly. There's better schools in/around DC for what she's chasing after, if'n she wanted to be pertinent in the USA with her Masters Degree.

Sometimes my language usage seems confusing - please feel free to 'read it twice', just in case !
Ya know, you can find the answer to your question with the advanced search tool, when using a PC? Ditch the handphone, come back later on a PC, and try again.

-=-=-=-=-=R E A D ! ! !=-=-=-=-=-

Whoa Nelly ! Want NVC Info? see http://www.visajourney.com/wiki/index.php/NVC_Process

Congratulations on your approval ! We All Applaud your accomplishment with Most Wonderful Kissies !

 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Malaysia
Timeline
Posted
  On 1/10/2015 at 3:02 AM, Darnell said:

Steve - I think Brat's plan for a MS in Singpura is useful ONLY if she is to remain in Singapura,

as

it's very specific to Singapura and not easily translatable into USA stuff. She'll learn a lot about law and beauracracy and whatnots, all specific to Singapura, not specific knowledge to use in the USA.

I don't care where she goes - I was only suggesting to remain near the husband, share a bed nightly. There's better schools in/around DC for what she's chasing after, if'n she wanted to be pertinent in the USA with her Masters Degree.

well, I don't want to discredit Singapore's education system. But it really is limited in it's capacity. They do their best.

But if I was doing the hiring, I'd hire the US educated counterpart first, every time.

  On 1/10/2015 at 3:05 AM, N-o-l-a said:

Apparently women used to wear clothes in rap videos:

And you're showing us this because........

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
  On 1/10/2015 at 2:45 AM, SAT said:

what's in that little urn next to the stove? The earthern urn thingy.....

What's on top of the toaster oven? and why is it so close to the stove?

really?

It's for garlic. I tend to buy more garlic then it holds so I'm not sure why I keep it.

It's the baking sheets for the toaster oven. I have too small of a kitchen so that is where it stays.

My kitchen is my biggest complaint in the house.

  On 1/10/2015 at 2:49 AM, SAT said:

So, I ate dinner at home. And I went to drop off the nanny, and to bring a quart of that post partum soup to my friend. And I get dragged to 2 separate dinners in the same restaurant. So I had 3 dinners.

Some more pics on PB......

IMAG3374_zpszhneep9f.jpg

Showed the hillbilly your food pics, he said he would love to try it. I wouldn't touch it :P

  On 1/10/2015 at 2:59 AM, N-o-l-a said:

Looks like it is for garlic.

:yes:

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
  On 1/9/2015 at 7:50 PM, NLR said:

Many lbs for that height is actually pretty skinny. Hubs is Many lbs, quite skinny and Many'2.

Spousal dimensions corrected, Niki-B. ma'am.

  On 1/9/2015 at 7:52 PM, kitthekat said:

yep, he is definitely skinny and not fat lol.

Just wait, several years ma'am!

  On 1/9/2015 at 8:07 PM, SAT said:

Baby is 1 month today :)

Babies = cute, wee man.

  On 1/9/2015 at 8:25 PM, Ontarkie said:

She only slept Many-Manymins [...] dancing with the music blaring at 2 am till Many am worked also

Brings back the memories... welcome to mommyhood, D ma'am.

  On 1/9/2015 at 9:14 PM, Ontarkie said:

1. Cranky boy, think teething is up for tonight's sleepless schedule!

2. One head of cabbage

1. Brings back the memories... welcome to mommyhood, D ma'am.

2. If a cabbage and a carrot had a race, who would win, huh man?

The cabbage, because it's a head, see man.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted (edited)
  On 1/9/2015 at 10:49 PM, N-o-l-a said:

I got the little one to eat spinach last night and actually like it!

Congratulations, si ma'am.

Interesting to me is that Mini-B. has never been the slightest bit picky about what he eats, no man. Now, he says that he doesn't like onions, but that's probably because he heard Mrs. T-B. say that she didn't like them, she man.

The first time that Mama T-B. fed Mini-B., she exclaimed, "I don't believe it! He just opens his mouth and eats!"

:devil:, man

  On 1/9/2015 at 11:00 PM, SAT said:

what is Singapore's equivalent of say....Texas A&M?

I will bet $Many that, in Singapore, the number of Texas Aggies can be counted on the fingers of one knuckle, few man.

  On 1/9/2015 at 11:11 PM, Ontarkie said:

the second tooth is working its way out now so the poor boy is not a happy camper.

SO daughter sprung on me that her boyfriend wants her to move to Canada and in with him.

Welcome to mommyhood, D ma'am.

  On 1/9/2015 at 11:17 PM, SAT said:

he's a newfie?

Omigawd... the Texas Aggies of Canadia, aarrgh man.

  On 1/9/2015 at 11:20 PM, N-o-l-a said:

veggies tasted like someone had sprayed them with bathroom cleaner until I turned Many

You were either quite young or this was quite recent, narrows it down ma'am.

I'll never forget the day, when I was a younger teenager or preteen, when Papa T-B. managed to get me to eat Many (2x2x2x2-2) Brussels sprouts, one by one, when I couldn't stand them (still can't, no ingest man). It was without begging or threatening, too -- purely quiet reasoning on several convincing fronts, he man.

(Note to file: we still hate Brussels sprouts, yuck man.)

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted (edited)
  On 1/10/2015 at 12:02 AM, Ontarkie said:

Not any time soon. Also why I am done having kids

Just think, D ma'am -- your next Many offspring might be younger than your first grandchild, whee ma'am!

  On 1/10/2015 at 1:22 AM, Ontarkie said:

1. I have Many more.

2. one is in the oven

1. Number of cabbage dishes corrected, see ma'am.

2. You're pregnant, D ma'am! I knew it, whee ma'am! Congratulations, glee ma'am!!!!!!!

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
  On 1/10/2015 at 2:50 AM, Darnell said:

who puts tomato sauce in cabbage rolls?

Old song, sing man: Who Put the Overalls in Mrs. Murphy's Chowder?

  On 1/10/2015 at 4:24 AM, Ontarkie said:

1. My kitchen is my biggest complaint in the house.

2. I wouldn't touch it

1. Not the husband, no D ma'am?

2. Same here, no ingest man.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Rest-of-Friday report, read rest man:

Had hectic day selling POTSs, exhausting man.

Trudged to T-B.-mobile in Nueva York-like weather, who needs it man.

T-B.-mobile heater heats up wonderfully well, vulcanize man.

Managed to read book to obviously exhausted Mini-B., wee man.

Got much-needed nap, zzz man; again overslept part of late TV news, intense zzz man.

Dished the warsher, Friday man.

Only one ES on schedule this weekend, sigh man.

Earlyish (ca. Many a.m.), go to pick up rest of Mini-B.'s new bed with Mrs. T-B., she man.

Will see how rented cargo-van drives and is overcharged for, $ee perhaps $igh man.

Must de-dish the warsher, domestic man.

Cat prep zzz man.

Mornin', Commie-babe(s) with distributable +1 inventories!

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

And, of course, the communicative Commie-babe with +1 inventory shows up after I am exhausted from soliloquizing and must de-dish cat prep zzz, sigh man. Tardy Asia! Tardy, TARDY Asia!

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Not funny, Commie-babe with lavish +1 inventory.

Unfunny Asia! Unfunny, UNFUNNY Asia!

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

 
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...