NYPD Officer Sued 3 Times Before Death of Eric Garner

[LibCampFireClub 635]

I got with the program a long time ago. Fact it, the statute of limitations has been up a long time ago. This is why those women can't go after him. I know this because I researched it when it first broke here in this forum.

And talking about racial agenda? Should we go over your greatest hits?

Really? Did you know there is no statute of limitations on rape?

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

Yeah I was watching some guy on TV here in Dallas holding a counter protest. He was attacked and the cops didn't do squat about it. There is no way to have a normal discussion. The race baiters simply assault you, shout you down, or flat out call you a racist.

I'll pull a Janelle. I looked on Facebook chat and don't see you there. That must mean you're hiding from me.

And they should be locked up. But that's the idiots, there are genuine folks out there trying to get the message out.

I'm always on FB since it's on my phone, anytime you want to dance...

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

Really? Did you know there is no statute of limitations on rape?

Actually there is.

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/11/rape-statutes-of-limitation-maps-table

In most states, a major barrier to bringing the perpetrators of rape and sexual assault to justice is baked into the law. Nationwide, 34 states and Washington, DC, have statutes of limitations on filing rape or sexual-assault charges, ranging from 3 to 30 years. In New Hampshire, charges must be filed within six years of a crime; in Connecticut, it's five years. In Minnesota, it's three. Some states tie the statute of limitations to reporting deadlines. If a survivor in Illinois comes forward within three years, the state has 10 years to file charges. If she takes longer than that, the case dies.

Twenty-seven states extend or suspend statutes of limitations if DNA evidence can identify a suspect, but these exemptions vary. Georgia puts no time limit on rape cases in which a DNA match has been made. In Indiana, prosecutors must charge a suspect within one year of a DNA match. In Connecticut, the crime must be initially reported within five years for any future DNA match to be considered.

[LibCampFireClub 635]

It appears there are varying statutes for sexual assault for each state, and it depends on the degree of felony:

">

http://relieffundforsexualassaultvictims.org/resources/statutesoflimitationcrim-D.pdf

Edited December 6, 2014 by ExExpat

[Karee 4,190]

Seems someone came down with a sudden illness. How convenient.

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

It appears there are varying statutes for sexual assault for each state, and it depends on the degree of felony:

">

http://relieffundforsexualassaultvictims.org/resources/statutesoflimitationcrim-D.pdf

Yep, which is why I made my comment.

Seems someone came down with a sudden illness. How convenient.

I'm straight snitching on you when I talk to her.

[LibCampFireClub 635]

Yep, which is why I made my comment.

Currently there are a boatload of allegations against Cosby. Have you actually gone through each and every single one of them? Not likely.

http://www.ajc.com/news/news/women-bill-cosby-rape-allegations/njCmK/

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

Currently there are a boatload of allegations against Cosby. Have you actually gone through each and every single one of them? Not likely.

http://www.ajc.com/news/news/women-bill-cosby-rape-allegations/njCmK/

When I made my first comment, his first accuser had the attack in California. One year. If the rest aren't there and it happened in a place where there isn't one, then by all means take him to court. You really shouldn't make assumptions, they make you look even more silly. I really didn't think it was possible.

[LibCampFireClub 635]

When I made my first comment, his first accuser had the attack in California. One year. If the rest aren't there and it happened in a place where there isn't one, then by all means take him to court. You really shouldn't make assumptions, they make you look even more silly. I really didn't think it was possible.

You're really one whiny puppy. If you look into it, there may be a way to remove that chip on your shoulder that makes you feel like the world is against you and if you win just one battle, then it means all is well.

But dude, listen, if you somehow convince me, or the audience in your head that things are different than what they appear I am happy that it will bring you a moment's peace (I'm lying about that), but it felt good to say it.

Listen, it really doesn't matter whether any state or prosecutor brings charges to him as two things will happen. The first has happened already:

1. His career and legacy are forever tainted

2. There will be civil suits, for which you can thank your liberal attack dog, Gloria Alred. She's white by the way, which is probably why she's taking the case; she's a racist.

It's a damned pity people can be ruined in the press. Thank your liberal friends for that!

Edited December 7, 2014 by ExExpat

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

You're really one whiny puppy. If you look into it, there may be a way to remove that chip on your shoulder that makes you feel like the world is against you and if you win just one battle, then it means all is well.

But dude, listen, if you somehow convince me, or the audience in your head that things are different than what they appear I am happy that it will bring you a moment's peace (I'm lying about that), but it felt good to say it.

Listen, it really doesn't matter whether any state or prosecutor brings charges to him as two things will happen. The first has happened already:

1. His career and legacy are forever tainted

2. There will be civil suits, for which you can thank your liberal attack dog, Gloria Alred. She's white by the way, which is probably why she's taking the case; she's a racist.

It's a damned pity people can be ruined in the press. Thank your liberal friends for that!

Wow. How much does your life suck that you come here and still get beat? You can't beat me because you're not on my level. I post with some integrity. You change your stance on a whim. You're all fury and no substance. Even your stance on treason is weak because once it was pointed out you fall into the category you despise you had to back up. Or, you sink to posting racist videos or comments because it's low hanging fruit. Like I said before, stop trying to be witty. You can't pull it off.

Do you really think I care about what happens to him? Honestly if he did do those things, my only regret is the women didn't come forth sooner if he did those horrible things.

[LibCampFireClub 635]

Do you really think I care about what happens to him? Honestly if he did do those things, my only regret is the women didn't come forth sooner if he did those horrible things.

Never thought that for a second. The record shows you prefer to support felonious thugs who assault police officers.

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

Never thought that for a second. The record shows you prefer to support felonious thugs who assault police officers.

What record is that? Please show where I supported Mike Brown. And the record shows you're a unrepentant racist.

[LibCampFireClub 635]

What record is that? Please show where I supported Mike Brown. And the record shows you're a unrepentant racist.

I know, it's tough for you. That's cool. Exactly why would I ever see the need to dig up the platypusSHIT that you didn't even bother to bury? I'll help you. I wouldn't.

Because you're challenged, I'll help you out:

1. Do you agree that Michael Brown was a felon walking in the middle of the street the day he was shot?

2. Do you agree that Michael Brown brought about his own death after he assaulted a police officer?

3. Do you prefer to believe the witnesses who were impeached during the grand jury? (by the way, impeached is not the same as peach cobbler)

4. Do you think it's wise for people to publicly display and speak: Hands up don't shoot, in the name of Michael Brown? Is so, why?

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

When I made my first comment, his first accuser had the attack in California. One year. If the rest aren't there and it happened in a place where there isn't one, then by all means take him to court. You really shouldn't make assumptions, they make you look even more silly. I really didn't think it was possible.

That's not actually possible.

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

I know, it's tough for you. That's cool. Exactly why would I ever see the need to dig up the platypusSHIT that you didn't even bother to bury? I'll help you. I wouldn't.

Because you're challenged, I'll help you out:

1. Do you agree that Michael Brown was a felon walking in the middle of the street the day he was shot?

2. Do you agree that Michael Brown brought about his own death after he assaulted a police officer?

3. Do you prefer to believe the witnesses who were impeached during the grand jury? (by the way, impeached is not the same as peach cobbler)

4. Do you think it's wise for people to publicly display and speak: Hands up don't shoot, in the name of Michael Brown? Is so, why?

I'll and help you out since I know if things move too fast you lose focus:

1. Yes.

2. No, because assaulting a police officer doesn't mean death sentence. See Eric Frein. He killed a state trooper and wounded another one, yet he lives. Or the guy who fought about 5 police officers and grabbed one of their guns and got a shot off. Somehow he's still alive.

3. Show me all 16 witnesses that were impeached. Take your time, I got all night.

4. I wasn't there, nor do I walk around protesting this. Here's a better question for you. Why don't you ask someone who does this. Then come back here and let us know.