Here’s How a Seasoned Political Observer Says Republicans Should Respond When They’re Called Racists

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

Yes I did - in your post, specifically.

So what? Let their prejudices speak for themselves.

My point was that the charge of racism is devalued by the presumption that it will occur, even when it has not actually occurred. In doing so, it was not their prejudice that was made clear, but your own.

So, let me get this straight:

It's okay for a person to say racist things, we should just let that happen. But to call it out, that's a problem?

[LibCampFireClub 635]

The problem is I know, I never say anything racist. Sheez You people.

It gets tough out there when you want to make cowpies and ya ain't got any cows.

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

The problem is I know, I never say anything racist. Sheez You people.

What do you mean you people?

[LibCampFireClub 635]

Mister Marv keeps coming out swinging only to show he's all foam and no beer.

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

Mister Marv keeps coming out swinging only to show he's all foam and no beer.

Hey Exexpat, glad to see you're back. Have you thought about your treason comments? You remember those right? About how if you're stupid enough to talk about America, you should be tried for treason?

[LibCampFireClub 635]

All hat and no cattle.

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

All hat and no cattle.

That 2x4 to the face did a number on you. You might need some time to regain your mental facilities. Take your time, I'll wait.

[LibCampFireClub 635]

Question: How do you tell whether a lame prog-K9 can add? AKA: a dog who is limping on three legs that has been indoctrinated by his owner to believe in mystical liberal ideology and fuzzy math.

Answer: He puts down three and carries one.

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

Question: How do you tell whether a lame prog-K9 can add? AKA: a dog who is limping on three legs that has been indoctrinated by his owner to believe in mystical liberal ideology and fuzzy math.

Answer: He puts down three and carries one.

I must have hit you harder than I thought. Rambling and incoherence are signs of disorientation. Take it easy before you hurt yourself.

[LibCampFireClub 635]

Careful. Here's a dang deer who got infected just by eatin grass from the back yard pee patch of an infected 0bolaite prog. The only cure is more cowbell:

[Pooky 3,781]

So, let me get this straight:

It's okay for a person to say racist things, we should just let that happen. But to call it out, that's a problem?

If that's what you understood from what I wrote, then you have a serious comprehension problem.

When it happens, it should be called out. Presuming it will happen when it has not, which you did, is akin to crying wolf. Accusing someone of it, without it occurring, which you also did, despite your protestations of innocence, is flat out wrong.

Clear enough?

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

If that's what you understood from what I wrote, then you have a serious comprehension problem.

When it happens, it should be called out. Presuming it will happen when it has not, which you did, is akin to crying wolf. Accusing someone of it, without it occurring, which you also did, despite your protestations of innocence, is flat out wrong.

Clear enough?

Crystal. Now let me be clear:

When a member has consistently made bigoted and inflammatory comments on such a daily basis that it's to be expected, what is the appropriate response? Do we give them the benefit of the doubt and wipe the slate clean every time? Is that person exempt from any presumption even though they've shown they're bigoted towards certain individuals in 99% of their posts?

I've watched this member disrespect my religion, my ethnicity, and others. So I'm more apt to see it, even when you don't.

[LibCampFireClub 635]

Because Marvin considers himself to be gifted in the liberal art of discovering people he thinks will ring a bell on his gameshow, it wouldn't be nice for anyone to tell him that he's just wrong.

Or would it?

You bet it would.

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

Because Marvin considers himself to be gifted in the liberal art of discovering people he thinks will ring a bell on his gameshow, it wouldn't be nice for anyone to tell him that he's just wrong.

Or would it?

You bet it would.

Case in point.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Crystal. Now let me be clear:

When a member has consistently made bigoted and inflammatory comments on such a daily basis that it's to be expected, what is the appropriate response? Do we give them the benefit of the doubt and wipe the slate clean every time? Is that person exempt from any presumption even though they've shown they're bigoted towards certain individuals in 99% of their posts?

I've watched this member disrespect my religion, my ethnicity, and others. So I'm more apt to see it, even when you don't.

WOW you almost lost your cool. Maybe in year or two you might work up to raising your voice