Never again will the world say that Muslims did not stand up to the ISIS.

[Janelle2002 3,865]

I think it's cool that she is able to express herself in public this way. She didn't threaten anyone with violence. She only spoke her true feelings. Awesome huh?

No. It is only awesome when your free speech doesn't affect others. Quite frankly, I was utterly annoyed at her level of ignorance regardless if some of it had a small level of truth, for example, simulating into American culture. However, there is a proper way to do many things and her choice was tasteless. It says a lot about you to agree with this way of low level communication in public.

[LibCampFireClub 635]

Because there is no such thing as Americans killing each other or their own family. This is only something Muslims bring to the U.S. So let's just hate all Muslims because of this. Ok. Got it.

Nah, not all Muslims. You are radical. If we can devise a litmus test in lieu of an apology tour to distinguish evil Muslims from non-evil Muslims that would be awesome for everyone. Right?

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

Don't you just hate it that billions of people on earth could give a rip as to what Muslims think is cool and important? That's the beauty of America. People can come here to live and worship if they like. However, when they bring violence to their family or the family of others, well, that pisses common sense Americans off. So, we also reserve the right to thump those who are too cowardly to say how they feel about America and Americans in public. And for those who are stupid enough to berate America online or in public, well, you see, there is a word this regime ignores. It's called TREASON.

If that's true, then why do you disrespect the highest level of public office? The president of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Does this mean you're stupid?

[Janelle2002 3,865]

Nah, not all Muslims. You are radical. If we can devise a litmus test in lieu of an apology tour to distinguish evil Muslims from non-evil Muslims that would be awesome for everyone. Right?

Litmus test? Don't they go through interviews at the embassies before they come to America anyway? You must haven't visited the AP section for people from MENA countries.

[LibCampFireClub 635]

Litmus test? Don't they go through interviews at the embassies before they come to America anyway? You must haven't visited the AP section for people from MENA countries.

If they don't pass the interview, all they need do is enter the US via Mexico. The interview process in our CONSULATES abroad is wreaked with corruption and power gone mad due to the doctrines of Consular Non-Reviewability. People get through who should not get through, and people are denied who should not be denied according to current law. However, the laws are not implemented. That's why we need a cool litmus test. Maybe like singing a few bars of the National Anthem, or explaining the ingredients to a long island ice tea? Hmmmm, maybe we can do a DNA or saliva test? How about profiling? Not fair?

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

If they don't pass the interview, all they need do is enter the US via Mexico. The interview process in our CONSULATES abroad is wreaked with corruption and power gone mad due to the doctrines of Consular Non-Reviewability. People get through who should not get through, and people are denied who should not be denied according to current law. However, the laws are not implemented. That's why we need a cool litmus test. Maybe like singing a few bars of the National Anthem, or explaining the ingredients to a long island ice tea? Hmmmm, maybe we can do a DNA or saliva test? How about profiling? Not fair?

I'm curious to hear more about this treason idea you have, since you come on here every day and talk about the President of America.

[Janelle2002 3,865]

If they don't pass the interview, all they need do is enter the US via Mexico. The interview process in our CONSULATES abroad is wreaked with corruption and power gone mad due to the doctrines of Consular Non-Reviewability. People get through who should not get through, and people are denied who should not be denied according to current law. However, the laws are not implemented. That's why we need a cool litmus test. Maybe like singing a few bars of the National Anthem, or explaining the ingredients to a long island ice tea? Hmmmm, maybe we can do a DNA or saliva test? How about profiling? Not fair?

Teach me how to do this?

[LibCampFireClub 635]

Teach me how to do this?

The best way to learn is to have a passion to learn it. This will enable you to spend time online reading the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Then, read the legal debates about the content of these sacred documents. After that, you should study the Rule of Law in the US, how its implemented and enforced. Does it differ today than it did 10 years ago? 100 years ago?

Work with that. It will give you a good foundation to build on.

[Janelle2002 3,865]

The best way to learn is to have a passion to learn it. This will enable you to spend time online reading the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Then, read the legal debates about the content of these sacred documents. After that, you should study the Rule of Law in the US, how its implemented and enforced. Does it differ today than it did 10 years ago? 100 years ago?

Work with that. It will give you a good foundation to build on.

Do the people who get through that should not get through spend 100 years reading the U.S. Constitution and Bill of rights?

Edited October 23, 2014 by Janelle2002

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

The best way to learn is to have a passion to learn it. This will enable you to spend time online reading the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Then, read the legal debates about the content of these sacred documents. After that, you should study the Rule of Law in the US, how its implemented and enforced. Does it differ today than it did 10 years ago? 100 years ago?

Work with that. It will give you a good foundation to build on.

Cmon Exexpat. You brought up a very good point, and I'm trying to get more of your insight on it. Don't punk out now because you fit the very category you're complaining about.

[LibCampFireClub 635]

Do the people who get through that should not get through spend 100 years reading the U.S. Constitution and Bill of rights?

Come on now. Did you finish your assignment? No treats until you finish. These concepts can appear very mysterious until you learn the basics. Give it a try.

Edited October 23, 2014 by ExExpat

[Janelle2002 3,865]

Come on now. Did you finish your assignment? No treats until you finish. These concepts can appear very mysterious until you learn the basics. Give it a try.

I did. No results. That is why we are still separated. lol

[LibCampFireClub 635]

I did. No results. That is why we are still separated. lol

I know. It's the damnedest thing. Same country and two different political ideologies. Go figure. Conservatives who are interested in keeping and maintaining a rule of law and liberals who are hell-bent on dismantling it. Just another day in paradise.

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

I know. It's the damnedest thing. Same country and two different political ideologies. Go figure. Conservatives who are interested in keeping and maintaining a rule of law and liberals who are hell-bent on dismantling it. Just another day in paradise.

And what of those who disrespect our country by trash talking our president? Would does that? Liberals or Conservatives? I know BJ is a conservative but doesn't do that, he seems to be pretty level headed about the issue.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

And what of those who disrespect our country by trash talking our president? Would does that? Liberals or Conservatives? I know BJ is a conservative but doesn't do that, he seems to be pretty level headed about the issue.

How about all those Liberals who doged out Bush and still do