Jump to content
DavenRoxy

URGENT: Obama Admin Will Issue Travel Bans… But It’s Not What You Think

 Share

83 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Other Country: Russia
Timeline

1) The "experts" are not in agreement on this. It is inaccurate too present them as if they have unified point of view. Also it is unwise to underestimate all of us and our background.

I said there is not a clear consensus, which I believe would mean they are not all in agreement.

I posted the argument against in response to Karee's point. I concede the argument for travel restrictions does not need clarification. There seems to be some thinking there is no counter point. There is. Ipresented it but it's not my argument.

Sometimes you have to read from the beginning to understand what's going on.

Edited by Dakine10

QCjgyJZ.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

That's what world renowned Ebola expert Uncle Beer tells me.

Please point out where I've claimed to be an expert. I'll wait. Not a rhetorical question; you've made a claim that I've insinuated myself as expert. Proof or STFU.

You on the other hand have told us to trust "the experts". Who are these "experts"? CDC? You?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline

I said there is not a clear consensus, which I believe would mean they are not all in agreement.

I posted the argument against in response to Karee's point. I concede the argument for travel restrictions does not need clarification. There seems to be some thinking there is no counter point. There is. Ipresented it but it's not my argument.

Sometimes you have to read from the beginning to understand what's going on.

Not to nitpick, but a quick recap of the earliest posts in this thread did not reveal any in which you stated "not a clear consensus."

Still, maybe I missed something. Either way, NBD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Russia
Timeline

Not to nitpick, but a quick recap of the earliest posts in this thread did not reveal any in which you stated "not a clear consensus."

Still, maybe I missed something. Either way, NBD.

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/519016-urgent-obama-admin-will-issue-travel-bans-but-its-not-what-you-think/page-2#entry7296984

Nobody has made the argument we shouldn't worry about it.

The argument about travel bans has been made. Armchair Ebola experts overwhelmingly seem to be in favor. Public health and infectious disease experts don't reach a clear consensus.

Edited by Dakine10

QCjgyJZ.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Russia
Timeline

Please point out where I've claimed to be an expert. I'll wait. Not a rhetorical question; you've made a claim that I've insinuated myself as expert. Proof or STFU.

You act as if you know more than the experts. By definition then, you must be one.

QCjgyJZ.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Russia
Timeline

You on the other hand have told us to trust "the experts". Who are these "experts"? CDC? You?

I don't care if you trust the experts or not. Unless you have some sort of influence on public policy it doesn't matter.

I'll trust the real experts over the pretend ones. Again not that it matters and I am not an expert, but I know enough to discern who knows their stuff and who is full of it.

QCjgyJZ.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

Back on topic (until they intervene again...). Peggy Noonan nails it:

What normal people can see and imagine is that three Ebola cases have severely stressed the system. Washington is scrambling, the Centers for Disease Control is embarrassed, local hospitals are rushing to learn protocols and get in all necessary equipment. Nurses groups and unions have been enraged, the public alarmed—and all this after only three cases.

What would it look like if there were 300? That is not a big number in a nation of over 300 million. Yet it would leave the system hyperstressed, and hyperstressed things break down.

How many people and professionals have been involved in the treatment, transport, tracking, monitoring, isolation and public-information aspects of the three people who became sick? Again, what if it were 300—could we fully track, treat and handle all those cases? If scores of people begin over the next few weeks going to hospital emergency rooms with Ebola, how many of their doctors, nurses, orderlies, office staffers, communications workers and technicians would continue to report to their jobs? All of them at first, then most of them. But as things became more ragged, pressured and dangerous, would they continue?

This is why people are concerned. They can imagine how all this could turn south so fast, with only a few hundred cases. This is why the White House claims that we will not have a widespread breakout is fatuous: Even a limited breakout would take us into uncharted territory.

The only thing that will calm the public is competence.

If only we had a competent administration...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Guys, the bickering is distracting from the discussion of the topic. Thanks.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Russia
Timeline

What in the world are you blabbering about now?

Not aware that any response was 'required' and I'm also unaware of any 'threats'. <_<

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/519016-urgent-obama-admin-will-issue-travel-bans-but-its-not-what-you-think/page-2#entry7296977

QCjgyJZ.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So here's my 2 cents on the issue:

If we are going to require our service members that are to return from West Africa to quarantine for 21 days before returning why wouldn't we require others to do the same? 21 days is not a long time, how long do we applying for Visa wait? My K-1 petition was only 36 days, now i have another month or so at NVC and a 3-4 month wait for an appointment in Abu Dhabi. Most of us would be happy to spend 21 days.

But back to main point, why quarantine men and women building hospitals and not quarantine people that may or may nothave actually had contact?

Citizenship  :dancing:

19-FEB-2020 - Oath Ceremony, Passport Application, Voter Registration - ALL DONE!!!:dancing::dancing::dancing:

03-FEB-2020 - Received Oath Ceremony Notice (19-FEB-2020)

29-JAN-2020 - Interview complete - APPROVED!!!:dancing:😁

20-DEC-2019 - Received Interview Notice (29-JAN-2020)

18-JUL-2019 - Biometrics Appointment

29-JUN-2019 - NOA Date

24-JUN-2019 - N-400 Submitted Online

 

ROC

23-OCT-2017 - I-751 Filed. (USPS Priority Mail)

23-OCT-2017 - Packet Delivered and signed for

27-OCT-2017 - NOA Date - Received 02-NOV-2017

2018               - Biometrics and Interviewed Waived

11-Jan-2019 - I-751 Approved

14-Jan-2019 - 10 YearGreen Card Received :dancing:

AOS

20-May-2015 - I-485 Filed, Filed I-765, I-131 at same time. (USPS Express Mail)

21-MAY-2015 - Packet Delivered and signed for

26-May-2015 - NOA Date

16-Jun-2015 - Biometrics Appointment

19-Jan-2016 - I-485 AOS Approval I-797 by mail

27-Jan-2016 - 2 Year Green Card Received :dancing:

EAD, AP

20-May-2015 - Filed I-765, I-131 with AOS I-485 (USPS Express Mail)

21-MAY-2015 - Packet Delivered and signed for

26-May-2015 - NOA Date

16-Jun-2015 - Biometrics Appointment

03-Aug-2015 - EAD & AP Approved

16-Aug-2015 - Card Mailed (online update)

19-AUG-2015 - Card Received

:thumbs:(L)(F):thumbs:

K-1

05-SEP-2014 - I-129F Petition Package Sent

11-SEP-2014 - NOA1 Email Received - Assigned to CSC

20-OCT-2014 - NOA2 Hard Copy Received

03-FEB-2015 - Interview - APPROVED

25-APR-2015 - POE Minneapolis

16-May-2015 - Married, Brooklyn Park, MN (L):rolleyes::D:dancing:

05-DEC-2015 - Son enters on K-2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline

So here's my 2 cents on the issue:

If we are going to require our service members that are to return from West Africa to quarantine for 21 days before returning why wouldn't we require others to do the same? 21 days is not a long time, how long do we applying for Visa wait? My K-1 petition was only 36 days, now i have another month or so at NVC and a 3-4 month wait for an appointment in Abu Dhabi. Most of us would be happy to spend 21 days.

But back to main point, why quarantine men and women building hospitals and not quarantine people that may or may nothave actually had contact?

Probably because locking up foreign nationals and USCs who haven't committed any crime is a bit excessive. The disease isn't contagious until symptoms manifest. People who turn up at an airport with active symptoms should certainly be quarantined (which is what is happening), but quarantining everyone who flies in from a particular country? Its not necessary.

If you're in the military, the government owns you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...