Jump to content

53 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

Lol I wasn't offended and I wasn't trying to offend you either. The thing is that I had a heated discussion about this already so I didn't want to impose my thoughts on anyone. In any case I only suggested that people look this up on their own instead of taking my word for it.

This does not constitute legal advice.

Filed: Timeline
Posted

If you are getting divorced, that may qualify as a "major life event", but I'm not sure if you have be in divorce proceedings or if it has to be final, you may want to find out in your state's health exchange. You should apply for health coverage because you don't know what you may qualify for.

Also I would just like to note since others mentioned this and I'm not telling you whether you should do it or not, I'm just pointing out a fact, the I-864 does give you the right to sue your husband for support.

This is a lawsuit separate from divorce and is solely based on the I-864. People were incorrect in saying that the form is only for the government to sue for benefits you receive, I verified this by reading the I-864 again and I know there have been lawsuits against sponsors, but mostly from an ex spouse.

Hmm, I didnt see anyone specifically mentioning in this thread things like the 864 is ONLY for the gov to sue to collect back benefits you receive and/or you can not sue your spouse or use it in the divorce.

I mean the benefit part was the only part addressed because its the only part that applies to her. Like Ontarkie said- suing him for support or asking for alimony isnt going to go anywhere when hes got no job, hasnt been holding jobs during the marriage, has no prospects of a job etc. Plus the fact is they have been separated for TWO YEARS already. They have no kids, she has a college degree, I mean the list goes on and on why she is quite capable of providing for herself. Its not going to fly in front of a judge. Sure its tough- its like that for A LOT of people, citizens, residents, non residents. Its a bad time economically.

I personally dont really see the point in throwing useless but correct facts at people. Why flood someone with information that is useless to them?

Can you please provide us with links of your sources? Law can be interpreted differently, and if you have links of any successful court cases that would help other posters to be able to help others in the future.

Until sources are cited, I'm afraid this is just going to be considered a case of "I saw a naked man on a flying unicorn once". (I really did!)

Dude there are tons of sources. Try google. Try the search bar on here.

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/417935-getting-sued-using-i864/

^ this was being bumped to keep it on page 1-2 of the forums but got lost again.

On a side note its kinda amusing how biased Americans are. We are so certain that we are the promised land and that everyone wants to come here and oh my gosh the thought of someone wanting to leave!! We just cant fathom it. Give up your residency?? Are you crazy? Your precious American residency?!? To go to... Mexico? Sure you have no family here, no support system, no friends, no job- at least not one youd consider a career. But this is the USA and thats... Mexico.

Eh, but I do agree if she can hang in there and file for citzenship before leaving its a smart move. Mexico allows for dual citzenship. So all its going to cost her is a little money and some time. The potential future opportunities is definitely worth it.

Posted

I wasn't flooding the OP with useless info, I was stating a fact that does apply to her. In any case I wasn't suggesting that she sue her husband, which I clearly spelled out.

Furthermore, I'm getting the vibe that people seem to be confusing support under the I-864 with alimony, two completely different things. The legal basis to sue under the I-864 is not the same required for alimony. To sue under the I-864, she only has to prove that she isn't being supported at 125% of the poverty level.

In any case I'm not arguing any merits in her case, but rather letting her know her options. Therefore, my info isn't useless, because only she can decide if she will use that info or not, my intention here is only to let her know what her rights are. No one on here can't tell her that she can't sue or that she won't get anything out of it, that's only for a judge to determine.

There is a difference between being able to sue, known as standing, and the merits of your case.

This does not constitute legal advice.

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Argentina
Timeline
Posted

Hmm, I didnt see anyone specifically mentioning in this thread things like the 864 is ONLY for the gov to sue to collect back benefits you receive and/or you can not sue your spouse or use it in the divorce.

I mean the benefit part was the only part addressed because its the only part that applies to her. Like Ontarkie said- suing him for support or asking for alimony isnt going to go anywhere when hes got no job, hasnt been holding jobs during the marriage, has no prospects of a job etc. Plus the fact is they have been separated for TWO YEARS already. They have no kids, she has a college degree, I mean the list goes on and on why she is quite capable of providing for herself. Its not going to fly in front of a judge. Sure its tough- its like that for A LOT of people, citizens, residents, non residents. Its a bad time economically.

I personally dont really see the point in throwing useless but correct facts at people. Why flood someone with information that is useless to them?

Dude there are tons of sources. Try google. Try the search bar on here.

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/417935-getting-sued-using-i864/

^ this was being bumped to keep it on page 1-2 of the forums but got lost again.

On a side note its kinda amusing how biased Americans are. We are so certain that we are the promised land and that everyone wants to come here and oh my gosh the thought of someone wanting to leave!! We just cant fathom it. Give up your residency?? Are you crazy? Your precious American residency?!? To go to... Mexico? Sure you have no family here, no support system, no friends, no job- at least not one youd consider a career. But this is the USA and thats... Mexico.

Eh, but I do agree if she can hang in there and file for citzenship before leaving its a smart move. Mexico allows for dual citzenship. So all its going to cost her is a little money and some time. The potential future opportunities is definitely worth it.

Yes I could've "Googled" but when others search for a thread looking for answers, and sources are cited and linked, it makes a difference when relevant advice is given, not to mention the ability for others to research the subject more. They can search too, but I personally believe (as a very fact-driven individual) that having the sources cited and linked on a page adds more credential and validity to people's claim. I try to link any sources on a subject that someone questions my basis on so people can educate themselves further if they so desire. It's just a courtesy I was asking of the individual who posted the information.

I wasn't flooding the OP with useless info, I was stating a fact that does apply to her. In any case I wasn't suggesting that she sue her husband, which I clearly spelled out.

Furthermore, I'm getting the vibe that people seem to be confusing support under the I-864 with alimony, two completely different things. The legal basis to sue under the I-864 is not the same required for alimony. To sue under the I-864, she only has to prove that she isn't being supported at 125% of the poverty level.

In any case I'm not arguing any merits in her case, but rather letting her know her options. Therefore, my info isn't useless, because only she can decide if she will use that info or not, my intention here is only to let her know what her rights are. No one on here can't tell her that she can't sue or that she won't get anything out of it, that's only for a judge to determine.

There is a difference between being able to sue, known as standing, and the merits of your case.

I agree that it was relevant, I think it's unlikely that the judge would order it since he's essentially broke -- however if his parents co-sponsored; they could be liable. In addition others who may search a similar issue and find this thread may find it useful information.

Many people ask if they can sue for alimony based on the I-864; not everyone is familiar with the legal process and legal speak. I'm no lawyer but I've spent YEARS in and out of family court with my ex husband, and business court with an ex employer. I got mighty familiar.

~ Don't forget to 'Vote Up' useful advice from others ~

K1 Visa Journey [April 11, 2013 - August 31, 2014]
[2014-09-20] !!! WEDDING !!!
[2014-09-22] Applied for SSN
[2014-09-26] Marriage License in Snail Mail
[2014-10-22] Notification of SSC in mail, will arrive "within 2 weeks"
[2014-10-27] SSC Arrived!

2015-04-30] Mailed AOS Package!
[2015-06-16] EAD Approved!
[2015-06-16] AP Approved!
[2015-06-23] EAD/AP Card Received!

[2015-10-02] AOS Approved (No Interview)!

[2015-10-07] Greencard Mailed

[2015-10-09] Approval Notice Recieved

[2015-10-09] Greencard Recieved!

I used RapidVisa for my petition; a paperwork service. A K1 is $375.00 to use their hassle-free online application system.

Useful Links:
Igor's List | Advanced Search Tool | Q&A With a Former USCIS Adjudicator
Visa Status Checker (Once you get a Case # from NVC) | Offical USCIS Reasons for a K1 Denial

The advice offered by this user is not legal advice. You should contact an attorney to obtain legal advice.

Filed: Timeline
Posted

I wasn't flooding the OP with useless info, I was stating a fact that does apply to her. In any case I wasn't suggesting that she sue her husband, which I clearly spelled out.

Furthermore, I'm getting the vibe that people seem to be confusing support under the I-864 with alimony, two completely different things. The legal basis to sue under the I-864 is not the same required for alimony. To sue under the I-864, she only has to prove that she isn't being supported at 125% of the poverty level.

In any case I'm not arguing any merits in her case, but rather letting her know her options. Therefore, my info isn't useless, because only she can decide if she will use that info or not, my intention here is only to let her know what her rights are. No one on here can't tell her that she can't sue or that she won't get anything out of it, that's only for a judge to determine.

There is a difference between being able to sue, known as standing, and the merits of your case.

Hmm. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree then.

IMO its useless to advise somebody of something that doesnt apply to them practically. Sure 100% she has every right to sue. But practically? Nope. You may not be arguing the merits of her case- but I am and she dosent have a leg to stand on. Theyve been separated for 2 years, they have no kids, she has a college degree. No judge is going to order support for her.

And before this gets all huffy types of responses like how dare you- only a judge can make decisions- who do you think you are. I will fully acknowledge that it does come down a judges ruling at the end. But Im talking common sense and practicality vs the letter of the law.

If one reads through Benders Immigration Bulletin which was linked in the above thread on the 864- its a comprehensive look at court rulings in which support was sought. Some granted, some not.

Apply the knowledge you gain reading the bulletin and youll see she has little merit to successfully suing.

So for me its like- why tell somebody something that they wont be able to utilize? Just... because? Because you know it and its a legal fact. Its irregardless that its a dead end for them. Just pile it on to add to their confusion.

----------

Anyway. I dont think the OP is specifically looking for money from the ex, or for someone to support her as was suggested in the thread. (although money is an issue).

She expressed frustration at the fact that the husband is back living with his mommy and daddy and they have now given her some attitude about not wanting her around because they are supporting him and thats enough. The parents position is probably something along the lines of they have to take their son - because hes their son, but her they can write off.

Maybe they still have intermingling finances. Maybe he's sucking off his parents and blaming her. Whatever the case the parents gave her attitude and she wants to 'scream at them'- hey you promised to support me when I came from Mexico, now do it.

Can she scream that at them? Sure. Is it going to mean anything? Nope. Can she print out successful cases of the 864 being used, stick it in their mailbox and threaten to sue them? Sure. But its going to do nothing but cause drama.

She says she has panic attacks and anxiety. So not really a good idea to intentionally cause drama. Esp drama thats just drama and no results or benefits.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted (edited)

why tell somebody something that they wont be able to utilize? Just... because? Because you know it and its a legal fact. Its irregardless that its a dead end for them. Just pile it on to add to their confusion.

The above goes to the heart of what VJ members want and need. Clear, practical advice is of far greater value than esoteric, theoretical musings that muddy the waters. Please limit the latter in favor of the former, and not just in this thread. No one cares how smart anyone looks -- the paramount issue is that advice is practical and of true use.

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Mexico
Timeline
Posted (edited)

Well I again thanks for the replies anyways.

It just seems to difficult to keep with all of these. I reallly get tired and so sick of all of this. I wonder why they have not created a thread called "Resigning to Permanent Residency and returning happily to your origin country".

Nobody knows where this country is going to be in the future. With all of the economy crashing and I really have more trust in the emerging markets. And more and more I understand why many us citizens resign and move abroad...

Edited by xmgirl
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Divorce this guy, get a job, ANY job, and file for U.S. Citizenship. You've invested a lot of time in the process already (and in this deadbeat husband).

Make that time worth something. If you have U.S. citizenship your opportunities increase.

"Wherever you go, you take yourself with you." --Neil Gaiman

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...