Jump to content
The Nature Boy

Final ruling issued against part of polygamy ban

 Share

44 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Why anyone would want to have two women giving them sh!t is beyond me.

Word.. Right on However if 1 man can manage many wimmens under the same roof. He is the man . I freely admit. I got very little say so in my house. VJ is the last shred of testicular dignity I have left . At least i can step into this arena, and pretend to be a man who has the courage of his convection's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the end of the day, one can close a browser and walk away from VJ and all the abuse and tell oneself that "I am the man!" (Just ask Maven)

But at home, one can only say it in one's own mind, and it's so damn hard to hear that when ONE woman is telling you otherwise. Just imagine 3 or 4 of them doing that! :crying::crying:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the end of the day, one can close a browser and walk away from VJ and all the abuse and tell oneself that "I am the man!" (Just ask Maven)

But at home, one can only say it in one's own mind, and it's so damn hard to hear that when ONE woman is telling you otherwise. Just imagine 3 or 4 of them doing that! :crying::crying:

My wife told me thank you and said I did something right 2 times in the past week. I am scared.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

"Bigamy is having one wife too many. Monogamy is the same thing."

---

The Arkansas police judge called the next case. "What's the charge against this here feller?" he asked the policeman.

"The charge is bigotry, Yer Honor," said the cop. "He's got three wives."

"Three wives?!" thundered the judge. "Why, you moron, that ain't bigotry -- that's trigonometry!"

---

A weary, sweating policeman emerged from an inner room of the station. "Well, did you give that thug the third degree?" asked the captain.

"Yeah. Six of us kept screaming and shouting and badgering him with questions for over four hours," was the tired reply.

"And what did you get out of him?" asked the captain eagerly.

"Nothing," said the policeman disgustedly. "All he did was doze off and from time to time murmur, 'Yes, Dear. You're right, Dear.'"

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Welcome, si man, but you must be out of +1 inventory. :P

---

A man's wife was arrested for shoplifting, and she was hauled before the small-town judge. "What did you steal?" asked the judge.

"A can of plums," the woman answered embarrassedly.

"How many plums were in the can?" asked the judge.

"Six," responded the woman.

"In this case," said the judge, "I sentence you to six days in jail -- one for each plum."

The woman's husband then whispered urgently, "Your Honor, she also stole a can of peas!"

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How delightful that a mod can post twice in here and ignore a blatant slur against a member.

Whatevs.

larissa-lima-says-who-is-against-the-que

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey no biggie, someone called me a dude because LADY OPINIONS. I mean, who cares? Least of all a mod who appears to be selectively blind to this.

Oh wait, this is report-driven so even if a mod posted in here twice I can't expect anything. But reporting posts that are offensive to oneself is evidence of Not Being Tough Enough for CEHST.

This is all too, too much for my ladybrain in my hulking blob of an American woman's body.

larissa-lima-says-who-is-against-the-que

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How delightful that a mod can post twice in here and ignore a blatant slur against a member.

Whatevs.

Blatant slur or playful jab

I see respectful jab

But if it really bothers you that much, why don't you report it. chances are, he did not even notice and if he did, he took it like I think it was meant.

Edited by The Nature Boy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i dunno nb, something tells me maven might have twists in her hair or lay down freestyle raps over bass driven beats in her spare time. you should be afraid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poor Tbone. Sits down with a glass of Tea. Makes a joke. Sits back with a mile. All is good then

giphy.gif


i dunno nb, something tells me maven might have twists in her hair or lay down freestyle raps over bass driven beats in her spare time. you should be afraid.

I fancy crazy bass beats and women with knotty hair , but only corn Rows

Dreads scare the bejezzuz out of me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...