Mom, kids pulled from car at gunpoint

[DavenRoxy 1,073]

I'm already looking her up since all black people know each other.

You should be proud of me for not confusing her with you.

[spookyturtle 9,465]

I have zero problems with how the police acted. The 911 caller said the vehicle exited on that ramp. It would be standard procedure to handcuff her.

Media just making a story about nothing.

You need to get off the farm and into civilization once in a while.

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

The 911 caller said the the car exited there. The 911 caller got confused. This is why the cops pulled her over.

They didn't know there was children in the car until one child exited the car.

The cops were just doing their jobs. Nobody was hurt or treated poorly.

The worst part about it is the actual troublemakers got away.

Original description. 4 black males in a beige or tan car. Her car was red.

The car didn't even match the description, nor did the people in the car.

[eieio 1,594]

Original description. 4 black males in a beige or tan car. Her car was red.

The car didn't even match the description, nor did the people in the car.

No sh## sherlock. I am sure the police we confused as well as the car did not match,but the caller was telling them the vehicle was exiting the freeway. They pulled the vehicle over that was the one.....according to the caller.

They are following directions from the 911 caller. What are they supposed to do? Ignore the caller? Figure out if she is wrong about the description of the vehicle?

It's not the cops fault the caller was confused about which vehicle it was.

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

No sh## sherlock. I am sure the police we confused as well as the car did not match,but the caller was telling them the vehicle was exiting the freeway. They pulled the vehicle over that was the one.....according to the caller.

They are following directions from the 911 caller. What are they supposed to do? Ignore the caller? Figure out if she is wrong about the description of the vehicle?

It's not the cops fault the caller was confused about which vehicle it was.

The car was exiting the freeway. Not THAT car.

How about finding the beige car full of dudes waving the gun, rather than the red car with the women and kids in it?

[eieio 1,594]

The car was exiting the freeway. Not THAT car.

How about finding the beige car full of dudes waving the gun, rather than the red car with the women and kids in it?

That was what they were trying to do.....based on the description from the caller. Don't forget it was at night.Colors are hard to see.

Plus...you are assuming all 911 calls are 100% accurate. The police know things,# people,age,sex are not always accurate.

The police acted upon the advice they were given and did an excellent job. It is unfortunate the caller was confused about the vehicle.

[sly_wolf 199]

I don't think it's normal to taze cops who make mistakes, at least not in my state. Is this something you are actually for?

Might be an idea since they like using it so much now.

[Dr. E.Z. Ryder 5]

That was what they were trying to do.....based on the description from the caller. Don't forget it was at night.Colors are hard to see.

Plus...you are assuming all 911 calls are 100% accurate. The police know things,# people,age,sex are not always accurate.

The police acted upon the advice they were given and did an excellent job. It is unfortunate the caller was confused about the vehicle.

They "know things"?

What did they know?

The 911 call itself is what the cops were responding to in the first place. So why would they completely ignore what the 911 information actually SAYS?

The cop also told her that her plate number "matched the description," when there was no license plate information given from the dispatcher.

That means the cop actually lied.

[spookyturtle 9,465]

Damn! There are more new sock puppets here than socks at a Gold Toe Outlet.

[eieio 1,594]

So why would they completely ignore what the 911 information actually SAYS?

They weren't.They pulled that car over because the 911 caller was telling them that the "gun wavers" were in that car.

What did they know?

# people,age,sex are not always accurate.

[Dr. E.Z. Ryder 5]

They weren't.They pulled that car over because the 911 caller was telling them that the "gun wavers" were in that car.

"That car"?

You mean the car that did not in any way come even close to matching the description given to them?

# people,age,sex are not always accurate.

So the information from the dispatcher was inaccurate? So where else where they getting their information from, given that it was that dispatch itself they were responding to?

And again, why did the cop lie to the woman about the license plate number?

Edited August 29, 2014 by Dr. E.Z. Ryder

[Expat1 971]

Now this is police brutality and stupidity at it's worst. I really feel bad for the Mom and the boy. The cops should be suspended without pay and sent to a training course.

I sort of think the cops should be suspended without pay and serve the same time and pay the same penalty as a carjacker

[eieio 1,594]

"That car"?

You mean the car that did not in any way come even close to matching the description given to them?

So the information from the dispatcher was inaccurate? So where else where they getting their information from, given that it was that dispatch itself they were responding to?

And again, why did the cop lie to the woman about the license plate number?

My advice is this.

You need to create another sock puppet account and then just argue with yourself.

If you can't understand English....maybe I will speak a language you understand? You are a ### #### #####!!!!

[Dr. E.Z. Ryder 5]

Damn! There are more new sock puppets here than socks at a Gold Toe Outlet.

My advice is this.

You need to create another sock puppet account and then just argue with yourself.

"Sock puppet." Right...

The only other account I have here is a non-confirmed one because I forgot to add the number in my email address when registering.

I registered because I came across this thread:

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/511611-john-crawford-case-its-open-carry-for-whites-and-open-season-on-blacks/page-1

All full of implications and taking everything at face value with "No problem here. He brought it on himself" and with very few questioning things like how a "Marine" was unable to tell a freaking AR-15 from a BB gun, plus some other nonsense about "Black on Black crime" and how Blacks "tend to bring this sort of violence on themselves."

I'll admit, I got a little annoyed. I dunno, maybe because I'm also Black, and probably because my OCD was pushing me, instead of lurking, I signed up.

If you can't understand English....maybe I will speak a language you understand? You are a ### #### #####!!!!

Maybe it's you who don't understand English.

The only thing the police listed to in that instance was the dispatcher. NO ONE ELSE.

The dispatcher is the one who alerted the police to what was happening, who then proceeded to outright ignore every single detail the dispatcher provided to them about the suspects and the vehicle they were driving, other than the occupants were Black. As a result, they pulled over and harassed a completely different car.

You implied it was okay for them to ignore the information the dispatcher provided them because it may not have been "100% accurate" and because "# people,age,sex are not always accurate."

Why would the police be drawing their "description" from somewhere other than the dispatch report? Where did their more "accurate" information come from? The dispatch itself is the thing they were responding to. How would they know whether the dispatch information was "accurate" or not if the info in the dispatch itself was the only info they knew about the situation and how they even knew about the situation at all in the first place?

Where the hell else would they know anything about the perps or what they were doing beforehand? So it's okay for them to outright ignore what's in the dispatch because they have their own description of the car, suspects and other more "accurate" knowledge that came from... nowhere?

They were portraying gross incompetence at best, and downright willful ignorance at worst.

And you still haven't explained why the cop lied to the woman about her license plate number matching.

Maybe you can't answer any of this because you have no argument?

Edited August 29, 2014 by Dr. E.Z. Ryder

[Teddy B 17,252]

Jinxy, that you?