Jump to content
decocker

John Crawford Case: It’s Open Carry for Whites and Open Season on Blacks

 Share

380 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

which stupid face am i supposed to be paying attention to?

I gave you two choices to make it easy. Pick one, there is no wrong answer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because they're white. Better now?

That sounds much more reasonable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Colombia
Timeline

One day we need to open a thread and name it "Guess the logical fallacy" and then go through posts like this one and have poll to "Name that logical fallacy!"

OK, Well lets see - the quote is there lets spend 30 seconds on Google.. the first one appears to be an extreme leftist that thought the best way to protest the open carry law was to go to a baseball game and show his gun to all the children. Guess he made his point as it became a topic of conversation again. He was not breaking any laws and was not in possession of the gun when police finally found him.

The second guy was most likely a right wing nut pointing a rifle at traffic - Very good work by officers to sneak up on him. We don't have details if he immediately dropped his weapon but we do know that at some point he was belligerent and was Tazered. This guy was lucky not to have been shot.

The third was a woman who when confronted by the police did not have possession of her gun. They found it later in her car and it was loaded.. Women really have to work hard to be shot.

If you needs to see some criminals brought down by the police I'll be happy to find a few for you - tell me any age range, any gender, and any race and if they were carrying a weapon and I can fill up the thread with links.. Then you can tell us what it proves.

Edited by OnMyWayID

I don't believe it.. Prove it to me and I still won't believe it. -Ford Prefect

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Colombia
Timeline

Loss prevention employees at walmart - They seriously don't want you stealing (Warning: F bombs abound):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5P7Zpyu8SA

I don't believe it.. Prove it to me and I still won't believe it. -Ford Prefect

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Thailand
Timeline

Loss prevention employees at walmart - They seriously don't want you stealing (Warning: F bombs abound):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5P7Zpyu8SA

Watching it the first time my thought was that the guy was gonna make a lot of money suing Walmart. Then I watched it again and realized the guy was trying to cut the security dudes with a box cutter. He's lucky it was only loss prevention, because a real cop would've probably shot him dead.

You can click on the 'X' to the right to ignore this signature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline

Loss prevention employees at walmart - They seriously don't want you stealing (Warning: F bombs abound):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5P7Zpyu8SA

There's some obvious assault going on there. I'm not clear on why Walmart, which can afford to claim losses to shoplifting on its insurance or else write it off would want to use security staff that could get embroiled in this sort of thing. Seems to me that CCTV cameras and RFID/GPS tags on valuable merchandise are enough to deal with shoplifters - you don't need private security people brawling with teenagers in the car park.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Thailand
Timeline

There's some obvious assault going on there. I'm not clear on why Walmart, which can afford to claim losses to shoplifting on its insurance or else write it off would want to use security staff that could get embroiled in this sort of thing. Seems to me that CCTV cameras and RFID/GPS tags on valuable merchandise are enough to deal with shoplifters - you don't need private security people brawling with teenagers in the car park.

Yeah you can't even see what he was stealing. Maybe he stole the box cutter. Hardly seems worthy of getting sliced and diced over that.

You can click on the 'X' to the right to ignore this signature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Colombia
Timeline

Yeah you can't even see what he was stealing. Maybe he stole the box cutter. Hardly seems worthy of getting sliced and diced over that.

You don't get that 11.50 to 12.00 an hour bump turning in a "saw him leave via camera" report.

I've never heard any one yell "loss prevention!" like it is some sort of authority that I am supposed to respect.. They both did it so it must be required.

Also this video was recorded by the friend of the guy in the red shirt at his request.

I don't believe it.. Prove it to me and I still won't believe it. -Ford Prefect

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

Because they're white. Better now?

This a genuine answer?

One day we need to open a thread and name it "Guess the logical fallacy" and then go through posts like this one and have poll to "Name that logical fallacy!"

OK, Well lets see - the quote is there lets spend 30 seconds on Google.. the first one appears to be an extreme leftist that thought the best way to protest the open carry law was to go to a baseball game and show his gun to all the children. Guess he made his point as it became a topic of conversation again. He was not breaking any laws and was not in possession of the gun when police finally found him.

WHAT?
"...when police finally found him."
The reports states police were responding to 22 9/11 calls from the park. It explicitly says they showed up AT the park and confronted him at said park, the scene of the disturbance. Where did you get that he wasn't in possession of the gun from?
Did he just throw it in a bush somewhere when they showed up?
And what makes that guy a "leftist"?

He was not breaking any laws...

Neither was Crawford.

The second guy was most likely a right wing nut pointing a rifle at traffic - Very good work by officers to sneak up on him. We don't have details if he immediately dropped his weapon but we do know that at some point he was belligerent and was Tazered. This guy was lucky not to have been shot.

I guess so...
And "right wing nut"? That guy just comes off crazy to me.

The third was a woman who when confronted by the police did not have possession of her gun. They found it later in her car and it was loaded.. Women really have to work hard to be shot.

What the hell?

Are we reading the same article? Your description is the complete opposite of what it says:

A sheriff's detective soon stopped Alday and was joined by a deputy, who asked Alday if she had a gun. "Yes, I have a concealed weapons permit, and you are not taking my gun," the arrest report states.

Alday refused to get out of her vehicle, and the deputy twice stunned her with his Taser after she reached toward the passenger seat and continued to struggle. The deputies then pulled her from the SUV and handcuffed her.

The gun — a loaded Smith & Wesson .38 Airweight — was found in the center console.

They confronted her when they pulled her over in her car. She was driving right from the Walmart where she committed the incident. She was in possession of the gun because it was in the car right beside her.

Not only did she not comply, they tased her twice because they saw her actually reaching for something.

I'd say she was working pretty damn hard.

Edited by Dr. E.Z. Ryder
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...