Jump to content
tds

Despite permanent GC and baby, GC being revoked

 Share

18 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: F-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline

This is happening to someone i know.

The couple divorced about 3 years after the permanent GC had been issued and all in all, had been married for about 5 years. They have a 10 year old mutual kid.
However, after the divorce, the usc wife reported him. a few weeks ago, the guy received a notice revoking his GC and and a court date.

The notice states that the usc claims that he manipulated and used her. that he pretended all through and that he divorced with no good reason at his convinience among othe things.

this just shows how uscis can be aggresive and how an vindictive ex can cause serious damage.

also, this shatters the myth that people are safe when they get the 10 yr card.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is happening to someone i know.

The couple divorced about 3 years after the permanent GC had been issued and all in all, had been married for about 5 years. They have a 10 year old mutual kid.

However, after the divorce, the usc wife reported him. a few weeks ago, the guy received a notice revoking his GC and and a court date.

The notice states that the usc claims that he manipulated and used her. that he pretended all through and that he divorced with no good reason at his convinience among othe things.

this just shows how uscis can be aggresive and how an vindictive ex can cause serious damage.

also, this shatters the myth that people are safe when they get the 10 yr card.

I hate to burst your bubble but there is no myth about being safe after getting the GC. The only time you are safe is after naturalization and even then, if the USCIS EVER thinks the immigrant received their GC based on fraud or mis-representation it can be revoked, but only by an immigration judge (IJ). Your friend has the opportunity to plead his case in front of the IJ. My question and one thing that actually might work in his favor is why did he not file for Naturalization as he was a LPR for 5 years and he was married to a USC for 3 years. If he had filed for naturalization then his ex-wife could not do anything. Most scammers get USC as fast as they can to avoid this situation.

He needs to get a very good immigration lawyer and show that he in fact entered the US and married his wife in good faith and tried to have a family. His ex-wife must have had some pretty damning evidence as USCIS usually does not go after an immigrant based on the complaint of an ex-spouse.

I wish him well during this situation,

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline

Happens, but it is extremely unusual and where there is evidence.

Here you see mainly he said she said situations.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

USCIS and ICE do not bring cases based on letters, suppositions, hunches, or guesses, but with solid, verifiable proof that will stand up in court. If they are going after his green card then they have obtained, either from his former spouse or from their own investigation, some solid proof that they believe enables them to revoke his green card.

The final decision will be down to an immigration judge, and he will have the opportunity to put his side of the story then. He should retain a competent immigration attorney before that point, if he hasn't already.

Edited by Hypnos

Widow/er AoS Guide | Have AoS questions? Read (some) answers here

 

AoS

Day 0 (4/23/12) Petitions mailed (I-360, I-485, I-765)
2 (4/25/12) Petitions delivered to Chicago Lockbox
11 (5/3/12) Received 3 paper NOAs
13 (5/5/12) Received biometrics appointment for 5/23
15 (5/7/12) Did an unpleasant walk-in biometrics in Fort Worth, TX
45 (6/7/12) Received email & text notification of an interview on 7/10
67 (6/29/12) EAD production ordered
77 (7/9/12) Received EAD
78 (7/10/12) Interview
100 (8/1/12) I-485 transferred to Vermont Service Centre
143 (9/13/12) Contacted DHS Ombudsman
268 (1/16/13) I-360, I-485 consolidated and transferred to Dallas
299 (2/16/13) Received second interview letter for 3/8
319 (3/8/13) Approved at interview
345 (4/3/13) I-360, I-485 formally approved; green card production ordered
353 (4/11/13) Received green card

 

Naturalisation

Day 0 (1/3/18) N-400 filed online

Day 6 (1/9/18) Walk-in biometrics in Fort Worth, TX

Day 341 (12/10/18) Interview was scheduled for 1/14/19

Day 376 (1/14/19) Interview

Day 385 (1/23/19) Denied

Day 400 (2/7/19) Denial revoked; N-400 approved; oath ceremony set for 2/14/19

Day 407 (2/14/19) Oath ceremony in Dallas, TX

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Vietnam
Timeline

USCIS and ICE do not bring cases based on letters, suppositions, hunches, or guesses, but with solid, verifiable proof that will stand up in court.

Letters are evidence. Been there done that. Turned in to ICE and FDNS. Photos are evodence too. Been there done that.

"I love you."

"I'll never leave you"

"I don't talk to my ex anymore"

These last 3 statements sound nice but.....

Sincerely,

VerySadGuy

30 year healthcare professional

Victim of heinous immigration romance scam

Father of a lovely little girl

And champion for those wronged by fraud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^^

Evidence of what?

Evidence that the immigrant entered the marriage for the PESON and not the immigration benefits and ultimately the GC and USC. He has cleared on hurdle in that the ROC was approved, so the USCIS person must have thought the relationship was legit. Somehow there is some very damning evidence to the contrary. He will need to examine his behavior and deeds since getting married and find has much documentation to show that he married the ex for all the "right" reasons and not to get a GC.

One thing he MAY have in his favor is his ability or lack there of to visit the child after the divorce. If he is deported, he will be denied the ability to be in the child's life. The IJ MAY take that into consideration or may not.

Good luck,

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm curious if you've actually read this letter? The way you've written about it sounds like this is third hand information filtered through the view point of your friend. One thing is for certain, USCIS would not take this action without strong evidence, and certainly not with just his wife's opinion of what happened. And it doesn't matter how long he's been here, how many children he's had, or how long he was married, heck he could still be married, if he committed fraud or lied they can take it all away, even after citizenship. This is why we say never ever lie to immigration officials. He's going to need to get a good lawyer. And I the only one that thinks it sounds as if he's already missed a hearing where the green card was revoked and is now in deportation proceedings?

K1 from the Philippines
Arrival : 2011-09-08
Married : 2011-10-15
AOS
Date Card Received : 2012-07-13
EAD
Date Card Received : 2012-02-04

Sent ROC : 4-1-2014
Noa1 : 4-2-2014
Bio Complete : 4-18-2014
Approved : 6-24-2014

N-400 sent 2-13-2016
Bio Complete 3-14-2016
Interview
Oath Taking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline

OP's first and only post, which is odd?

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OP's first and only post, which is odd?

Well it was a friend of the OPs and we know how those often work out.

K1 from the Philippines
Arrival : 2011-09-08
Married : 2011-10-15
AOS
Date Card Received : 2012-07-13
EAD
Date Card Received : 2012-02-04

Sent ROC : 4-1-2014
Noa1 : 4-2-2014
Bio Complete : 4-18-2014
Approved : 6-24-2014

N-400 sent 2-13-2016
Bio Complete 3-14-2016
Interview
Oath Taking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

Letters are evidence. Been there done that. Turned in to ICE and FDNS. Photos are evodence too. Been there done that.

"I love you."

"I'll never leave you"

"I don't talk to my ex anymore"

These last 3 statements sound nice but.....

Your comment is ambiguous... You did not make sense at least

Edited by onye uwaoma
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

I hate to burst your bubble but there is no myth about being safe after getting the GC. The only time you are safe is after naturalization and even then, if the USCIS EVER thinks the immigrant received their GC based on fraud or mis-representation it can be revoked, but only by an immigration judge (IJ). Your friend has the opportunity to plead his case in front of the IJ. My question and one thing that actually might work in his favor is why did he not file for Naturalization as he was a LPR for 5 years and he was married to a USC for 3 years. If he had filed for naturalization then his ex-wife could not do anything. Most scammers get USC as fast as they can to avoid this situation.

He needs to get a very good immigration lawyer and show that he in fact entered the US and married his wife in good faith and tried to have a family. His ex-wife must have had some pretty damning evidence as USCIS usually does not go after an immigrant based on the complaint of an ex-spouse.

I wish him well during this situation,

Dave

Most scammers hardly stay with their USC spouse for all 2yrs duration requirement, let alone pursuing citizenship in the earliest possible time of 3yrs at least. How could you make claims you are most ignorant about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Iran
Timeline

There could have been other issues such as the immigrant lying about a marriage in another country, criminal history which was not located, a lot of issues. I doubt this was the result of just one letter from an individual unless they provided proof of fraud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...