Paul Ryan: Obama executive orders do "not rise to the high crimes and misdemeanor level" required for impeachment

[mota bhai 2,675]

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/07/paul-ryan-no-obama-impeachment-109539.html

I will be pasting articles as images going forward. I was recently suspended due to contents of an article changing after I copy-pasted the contents to VJ. This way, hopefully VJ moderators will have less reason to accuse me of intentionally inserting lies into posted articles.

[decocker 7,198]

i'm a fan of ironic signatures, but not matter of fact signatures in italics or colored font.

eta: paul ryan needs to get with the program and back his base.

Edited July 30, 2014 by val erie

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Agree. I told one of my Libanista buddies the other day. One of our right wing low IQ buddies was talking about Obama. Impeachment, and he is trying to crash the economy, were all in one breath.

I said, that's just embarrassing for our friend.

Impeach him for what ?

[decocker 7,198]

Agree. I told one of my Libanista buddies the other day. One of our right wing low IQ buddies was talking about Obama. Impeachment, and he is trying to crash the economy, were all in one breath.

I said, that's just embarrassing for our friend.

Impeach him for what ?

and what's up with you? all reasonable and whatnot

[SMOKE 1,426]

Impeach him for what ?

F that encourage him. please please please sign a blanket amnesty order.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

and what's up with you? all reasonable and whatnot

I am not more reasonable. Your understanding has changed . I always try to keep to the truth.

I had a FB friend post something today saying Pelosi called Hamas a Humanitarian organization. I called her out on it, because after watching the video, Pelosi did not . It was taken way out of context. Not meaning i like Pelosi , just meaning.. Try to be accurate and truthful. Obama has not committed an impeachable offense yet. Now once the IRS E-mails come to light.. maybe

It's the whole 7 is not more than 5 absurdity.

[decocker 7,198]

I am not more reasonable. Your understanding has changed . I always try to keep to the truth.

I had a FB friend post something today saying Pelosi called Hamas a Humanitarian organization. I called her out on it, because after watching the video, Pelosi did not . It was taken way out of context. Not meaning i like Pelosi , just meaning.. Try to be accurate and truthful. Obama has not committed an impeachable offense yet. Now once the IRS E-mails come to light.. maybe

It's the whole 7 is not more than 5 absurdity.

i dunno. sounds to me like you've been dippin into the blue koolaide.

[mota bhai 2,675]

NB's gone lib. Stone him!

[JohnR! 5,495]

How long until they start calling Ryan a RINO...

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/07/paul-ryan-no-obama-impeachment-109539.html

I will be pasting articles as images going forward. I was recently suspended due to contents of an article changing after I copy-pasted the contents to VJ. This way, hopefully VJ moderators will have less reason to accuse me of intentionally inserting lies into posted articles.

[spookyturtle 9,466]

NB's gone lib. Stone him!

He's been hang'n out with the VJ liberals. Next thing you know he'll be anti gun.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

NB's gone lib. Stone him!

No I am just consistent. I don't change what I think about things, based on who is in office. The impeach Bush crowd were Nits, and the impeach obama crowd are nits, up until this point.

It's about consistency in ones views, the same crowd that screamed about Bush and the national debt, and I agree with them, all of a sudden think it's no big deal about the debt any longer. Same thing about the nits that screamed for Bush's impeachment , are A-Ok with obama doing many of the same things. Of course the same is true in reverse.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

He's been hang'n out with the VJ liberals. Next thing you know he'll be anti gun.

I have said all along I am for some changes. 100% background checks for one. The problem is that usually, right out of the gate you get the anti-gun hysteria crowd screaming, Ban assault looking weapons and magazine capacities, then things go south from there. They are just as much to blame for the failure of meaningful gun law changes in this country as the carry a machine gun to Starbucks crowd.

[decocker 7,198]

I have said all along I am for some changes. 100% background checks for one. The problem is that usually, right out of the gate you get the anti-gun hysteria crowd screaming, Ban assault looking weapons and magazine capacities, then things go south from there. They are just as much to blame for the failure of meaningful gun law changes in this country as the carry a machine gun to Starbucks crowd.

i think you need a refill on your koolaid.

[Pooky 3,786]

Moving to impeach the President before November is about the only way the Republicans have of ensuring a continuing Democrat majority in the Senate.