Jump to content
RyRo

Visa overstays get amnesty... They break the law, and then get to stay...

 Share

259 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

I don't know how people can truly believe that living life as an undocumented migrant in this country is in any way desirable. I would wager a guess that given the opportunity to come here in the way our spouses do, those poor schmucks that sneak across the southern border would take that over their path any day of the week and twice on Sundays. To pretend that they are somehow better off is just utterly ridiculous.

You mean to say that if I were to pay their way to come over legally they would prefer that? Well duh.

Or are you trying to say that they don't sneak over because it is the easiest and cheapest way to get here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Thailand
Timeline

I tell you what... let's keep this simple and un-confusing for everyone. Without any snide, deprecating remarks that typically go along with your replies, can you answer either YES or NO to the following question for us:

Has the national debt increased more under Obama in 5 years than it did under Bush in 8 years?

Year by Year Breakout:

  • FY 2009 - Although this was actually President Bush's last budget, it was being implemented during Obama's first year. Congress agreed to add the first year's worth of spending from the Economic Stimulus Act to this. That $253 billion accrues to Obama.
  • FY 2010 - Obama's first budget created a $1.293 trillion deficit.
  • FY 2012 - The deficit was the largest in history, at $1.327 trillion.
  • FY 2011 - It contributed $1.299 trillion to the debt.
  • FY 2013 - This was the first Obama budget where the deficit, $901 billion, was less than $1 trillion.

http://useconomy.about.com/od/usdebtanddeficit/p/National-Debt-Under-Obama.htm

Obama

253+

1293+

1327+

1299+

901+

5.072 Trillion in 5 years (This only counts up to FY2013)

President Bush added $3.294 trillion to the debt in eight years thanks to the Bush tax cuts and the War on Terror, both of which were responses to events that happened in his first year in office. Bush inherited the 2001 recession, which he combated by passing the EGTRRA. It attempted to stimulate the economy by lowering tax rates for most families, which resulted in tax rebate checks being mailed out through that summer. The recession officially ended in November, as economic growth started to improve.

Bush 3.294 Trillion in 8 years

5.072

3.294 -

1.778=

1.778 trillion more under 5 years of Obama vs.the 8 years Bush was in office.

You can click on the 'X' to the right to ignore this signature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

Well if Obama has his way, they wont be undocumented. Kinda the point of this thread. Try to keep up.

It is painfully obvious that it you that needs to keep up with the current events. Nobody has ever suggested that folks should be able to cross the border and then just be afforded papers. The proposal was to afford those that have been here for years and have established their lives here should be able to work here and reside here and yes, eventually work their way towards US citizenship. That is a process way longer and way more complicated than that which anyone here goes through or has gone through. Which is the point I was making. Try to catch it next time.

I tell you what... let's keep this simple and un-confusing for everyone. Without any snide, deprecating remarks that typically go along with your replies, can you answer either YES or NO to the following question for us:

Has the national debt increased more under Obama in 5 years than it did under Bush in 8 years?

In plain dollars, yes. Relative to the national debt each faced coming into the office, no. That should be simple enough, yes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

Obama

253+

1293+

1327+

1299+

901+

5.072 Trillion in 5 years (This only counts up to FY2013)

Bush 3.294 Trillion in 8 years

5.072

3.294 -

1.778=

1.778 trillion more under 5 years of Obama vs.the 8 years Bush was in office.

Interesting math there. The national debt stood at $6 trillion dollars at the end of FY 2001. It stood at $12 trillion 8 years later. Now take out that $253 billion that is attributable to Obama in FY 2009 per your calculation. Leaves the debt standing at $11.75 trillion after 8 Bush budgets. How is 11.75 - 6 = 3.3. Last I checked, 11.75 - 6 = 5.75. And 5.75 would appear to be greater than 5.1. But that's just me. ODS math must work differently.

Edited by Mr. Big Dog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Thailand
Timeline

Interesting math there. The national debt stood at $6 trillion dollars at the end of FY 2001. It stood at $12 trillion 8 years later. Now take out that $253 billion that is attributable to Obama in FY 2009 per your calculation. Leaves the debt standing at $11.75 trillion after 8 Bush budgets. How is 11.75 - 6 = 3.3. Last I checked, 11.75 - 6 = 5.75. And 5.75 would appear to be greater than 5.1. But that's just me. ODS math must work differently.

Apparently you didn't click the link. It explains it all there. Numbers don't lie no matter how much you wish they did.

You can click on the 'X' to the right to ignore this signature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Thailand
Timeline

It is painfully obvious that it you that needs to keep up with the current events. Nobody has ever suggested that folks should be able to cross the border and then just be afforded papers. The proposal was to afford those that have been here for years and have established their lives here should be able to work here and reside here and yes, eventually work their way towards US citizenship. That is a process way longer and way more complicated than that which anyone here goes through or has gone through. Which is the point I was making. Try to catch it next time.

No they wont get papers immediately. That's not the point. They'll get to stay and down the road they'll get their papers. They wont deport anyone unless they've committed a crime in the U.S. other than entering without inspection. Even large numbers of those folks come back and commit even more crimes. Who knows what crimes they committed in their home countries. All they do is ask them a few questions and that's good enough. In the mean time that encourages even more to come illegally. Rinse, repeat etc.

Look what happened in 1980 with the Mariel boatlift. Castro emptied his prisons and mental institutions and put them on boats bound for Florida.

Who cares about the consequences, as long as the Democrat party can get more folks to vote for them. The ironic thing is that the people who are gonna get screwed the most by all this are low income folks and union workers. Think the minority unemployment rate is high now? Wait until they add millions more unskilled workers to the mix.

You can click on the 'X' to the right to ignore this signature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All joking aside, it hurts to think that downward spiral is continuing, and illegal immigration is only part of it. Both parties have been on a mission that has been destroying this country for a couple of decades. How far have we fallen? Our time has peaked. The old gray mare ain't what she used to be.

R.I.P Spooky 2004-2015

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is painfully obvious that it you that needs to keep up with the current events. Nobody has ever suggested that folks should be able to cross the border and then just be afforded papers. The proposal was to afford those that have been here for years and have established their lives here should be able to work here and reside here and yes, eventually work their way towards US citizenship. That is a process way longer and way more complicated than that which anyone here goes through or has gone through. Which is the point I was making. Try to catch it next time.

In plain dollars, yes. Relative to the national debt each faced coming into the office, no. That should be simple enough, yes?

So do we get to subtract Bush's first year also since it was Clinton's budget ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Monaco
Timeline

Interesting math there. The national debt stood at $6 trillion dollars at the end of FY 2001. It stood at $12 trillion 8 years later. Now take out that $253 billion that is attributable to Obama in FY 2009 per your calculation. Leaves the debt standing at $11.75 trillion after 8 Bush budgets. How is 11.75 - 6 = 3.3. Last I checked, 11.75 - 6 = 5.75. And 5.75 would appear to be greater than 5.1. But that's just me. ODS math must work differently.

You are wasting your time. It is obvious the other poster is infatuated by his/her own notion.

200px-FSM_Logo.svg.png


www.ffrf.org




Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Folks, the personal bickering is detracting from an otherwise-good thread. Please avoid letting it detract from your further participation in the thread. Thanks.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is painfully obvious that it you that needs to keep up with the current events. Nobody has ever suggested that folks should be able to cross the border and then just be afforded papers. The proposal was to afford those that have been here for years and have established their lives here should be able to work here and reside here and yes, eventually work their way towards US citizenship. That is a process way longer and way more complicated than that which anyone here goes through or has gone through. Which is the point I was making. Try to catch it next time.

In plain dollars, yes. Relative to the national debt each faced coming into the office, no. That should be simple enough, yes?

You proved my point most eloquently. Thank you for participating.

Hint: The answer was - YES

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

No they wont get papers immediately. That's not the point. They'll get to stay and down the road they'll get their papers. They wont deport anyone unless they've committed a crime in the U.S. other than entering without inspection. Even large numbers of those folks come back and commit even more crimes. Who knows what crimes they committed in their home countries. All they do is ask them a few questions and that's good enough. In the mean time that encourages even more to come illegally. Rinse, repeat etc.

Look what happened in 1980 with the Mariel boatlift. Castro emptied his prisons and mental institutions and put them on boats bound for Florida.

Who cares about the consequences, as long as the Democrat party can get more folks to vote for them. The ironic thing is that the people who are gonna get screwed the most by all this are low income folks and union workers. Think the minority unemployment rate is high now? Wait until they add millions more unskilled workers to the mix.

And you're still missing the point entirely. The simple point I was making is that migrating here illegally is neither easier nor provides a faster path to immigration benefits than lawfully migrating here as the fiance(e) or spouse of a US citizen. There are petitioners here in this discussion that have suggested otherwise. All I did was point out that such notion is utterly ridiculous. That's all. Clear now?

Edited by Mr. Big Dog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Thailand
Timeline

And you're still missing the point entirely. The simple point I was making is that migrating here illegally is neither easier nor provides a faster path to immigration benefits than lawfully migrating here as the fiance(e) or spouse of a US citizen. There are petitioners here in this discussion that have suggested otherwise. All I did was point out that such notion is utterly ridiculous. That's all. Clear now?

That was like 18 topic changes ago. Don't fret though. You're cheerleader will be along shortly to tell you what a great job you're doing.

You can click on the 'X' to the right to ignore this signature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline

Let's bring some troop home, and their UAVs with them.

Securing the border with Hellfire missiles is probably the best idea ever.

November 14th, 2013: She's here!

December 12th, 2013: Picked up marriage license.

December 14th, 2013: Wedding

6gai.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...