Jump to content
pittbull

How beneficial is having USC accompany spouse at interview?

 Share

11 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Country: Pakistan
Timeline

My wife's K3 interview is coming up at the Islamabad embassy. She was previously (before marriage) denied student visa to US, and this is causing much concern to us having read other people's stories in similar cases.

My question is that would it be helpful at all for me to accompany her at the interview? I am in US and would have to travel specifically for this purpose.

Are there any other folks who have been through similar experience?

thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
My wife's K3 interview is coming up at the Islamabad embassy. She was previously (before marriage) denied student visa to US, and this is causing much concern to us having read other people's stories in similar cases.

My question is that would it be helpful at all for me to accompany her at the interview? I am in US and would have to travel specifically for this purpose.

Are there any other folks who have been through similar experience?

thanks!

All depends why she was refused a F

A F requires non immigrant intent, if that was the issue, then hardly relevant now.

Edited by Boiler

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Colombia
Timeline
My wife's K3 interview is coming up at the Islamabad embassy. She was previously (before marriage) denied student visa to US, and this is causing much concern to us having read other people's stories in similar cases.

My question is that would it be helpful at all for me to accompany her at the interview? I am in US and would have to travel specifically for this purpose.

Are there any other folks who have been through similar experience?

thanks!

It is a very personal choice and involves a lot of factors. Many many people don't attend and are awarded the visa.

I chose to attend my wifes interview in Bogota and we had no problems. I had the time and money to attend and choose to.

I think your presence goes a long way in demonstrating the validy of the marriage and you are there if any questions arise that you may be able to answer on the spot and avoid an RFE or outright denial.

I would try to find someone who has gone through the Isamblad embassy and get their experience.

I do know that as an American citizen I was allowed to enter (along with my wife) throught the citizen gate and save a lot of in line waiting.

If you can't make it, you can't make it and I wouldn't worry too much about it.

Ultimately; if your wife is denied, they DO have to give a reason for the denial. Usually it is for some forgotten documentation or error in filling out the forms.

good luck,

tp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

pittbull,

It would be very helpful if, during the course of the interview, the consular officer has some questions that need to be addressed to you. If you're there, and can answer satisfartorily, the visa can be issues promptly. If you're in the USA, a 221(g) will be issued and the visa will not be issued until you send in the requested information.

It's probably a rare occurance, but it happens.

Yodrak

My wife's K3 interview is coming up at the Islamabad embassy. She was previously (before marriage) denied student visa to US, and this is causing much concern to us having read other people's stories in similar cases.

My question is that would it be helpful at all for me to accompany her at the interview? I am in US and would have to travel specifically for this purpose.

Are there any other folks who have been through similar experience?

thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Pakistan
Timeline

Thanks for the replies. My wife was denied F1 twice on "insufficient ties to the home country" basis. It is true that particular reason is not an issue anymore, but we are concerned that the officer may doubt our marriage and k3 application as it was done in a few similar cases elsewhere on this forum. We do have a lot of supporting materials (pics, money transfer + phone + travel records, etc) but it seems that ultimately perceptions are more important in these interviews.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

pittbull,

Of course it's true. In fact the current application, in conjunction with other circumstances, could be taken as an indication that the consular officers who denied the previous visa application were correct in their assessments. And therein lies the possible reasoning for the K3 denials you mention - having failed to get to the USA on other grounds, the visa applicant has found a USC to marry and is now trying to get to the USA on that basis.

Yodrak

Thanks for the replies. My wife was denied F1 twice on "insufficient ties to the home country" basis. It is true that particular reason is not an issue anymore, but we are concerned that the officer may doubt our marriage and k3 application as it was done in a few similar cases elsewhere on this forum. .....
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline

Is there a reasonable gap between her refusals and the K3 being set in motion?

Edited by Boiler

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
your presence goes a long way in demonstrating the validy of the marriage and you are there if any questions arise that you may be able to answer on the spot and avoid an RFE or outright denial.
Believe this, follow it, and let nothing dissuade you from it.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Zambia
Timeline

There is this feeling that the husband "ought" to be there with his wife on such an important marital occasion, simply because it will affirm the validity and sincerity of the marriage - in view of her past efforts to enter the U.S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...