Sweden Goes insane

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Dispatch International. A counterjihad publication. Yeah, there's some facts for you.

B. it was not on MSNBC, Al-Jazerra, Salon,CNN or other left wing approved sources so it is obvious right wing bias ,no matter how many facts they quote

They never fail to fail, It's the easiest thing to do

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

B. it was not on MSNBC, Al-Jazerra, Salon,CNN or other left wing approved sources so it is obvious right wing bias ,no matter how many facts they quote

They never fail to fail, It's the easiest thing to do

What do you expect? You keep coming up with the looniest of sources. The World Nut Daily would be several steps up for you.

[Peikko 1,575]

I fail entirely to see how posting inane 'letter system' responses is not troll behaviour when responding to specific posts but with an opposite view point is. Perhaps someone impartial, like say I don't know, Spooky, could explain how the 'letter system of responses' isn't spam and ruining the posting experience for other members, hmm?

[OriZ 3,157]

It is not only Sweden...the entire European continent is going down the drain, and it started a couple of decades ago. Nowehere to go but downhill from here...

[Peikko 1,575]

It is not only Sweden...the entire European continent is going down the drain, and it started a couple of decades ago. Nowehere to go but downhill from here...

In what way? Any facts to go with this strange and vague statement?

[Boiler 45,525]

Agree, nothing new, nothing will change, move on.

[unsmiley 111]

I fail entirely to see how posting inane 'letter system' responses is not troll behaviour when responding to specific posts but with an opposite view point is. Perhaps someone impartial, like say I don't know, Spooky, could explain how the 'letter system of responses' isn't spam and ruining the posting experience for other members, hmm?

Because the letter system is clever commentary in and of itself. It points out the absurdity and repetitiveness of so many of the tired "arguments" presented on this site.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Because the letter system is clever commentary in and of itself. It points out the absurdity and repetitiveness of so many of the tired "arguments" presented on this site.

LOL.. I can only see his posts if someone replies. The short simple answer is I never use it to reply to a different view point. Only when resorts to one of the usual replies when they quickly run out of facts.

Usually it is a Face Palm Graphic, you missed the point, you can't comprehend English. If that fails, instead of explaining why you are wrong, they just assert that you have to be because whatever source you quoted does not meet their idea of a acceptable source. Then there is the old tried and true when discussing the sitting president. That usually goes something like ' "well Bush did it or Reagen did it, or I did not hear you complain when bush did it, as if they knew me then.

I hope he will realize that face palms, Reading comprehension and other general insults, etc are not viewpoints.

However having seen some of the comments by the poster I can understand the confusion.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I thought the letter system was indeed determined to be trolling and the mods told you to stop doing it.

[DavenRoxy 1,073]

Dispatch International. A counterjihad publication. Yeah, there's some facts for you.

Great comeback. Darn near qualifies as a half-liner. Denigrate the poster since you don't like what was posted. Been working for liberals for a while now.

66 rapes per 100,000 population sounds pretty high to me.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Pretty good explanation here about why comparing crime rates from other countries can be misleading http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19592372

[DavenRoxy 1,073]

Comparing rape rates varies greatly because of many variables. For example, I just learned tonight that the UK only considers is rape if a man does it. That's right women, go out and assert yourself sexually and unwanted on a man, and it's simple assault.

So comparing rates between countries will be tough. Heck, even trying to establish a trend in one country over several years may be nigh onto impossible.

Edited July 14, 2014 by DavenRoxy

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Which is what the article I posted says. You can't trust the numbers at face value.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Comparing rape rates varies greatly because of many variables. For example, I just learned tonight that the UK only considers is rape if a man does it. That's right women, go out and assert yourself sexually and unwanted on a man, and it's simple assault.

So comparing rates between countries will be tough. Heck, even trying to establish a trend in one country over several years may be nigh onto impossible.

Unless it's gun crime, then it means everything

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Wild Tangent strikes again.