Finally am forced to admit being scammed

[SingleDad2usc 71]

As it turns out, OP moved himself out too - so he's not under threat of potential restraining order. Trolling was what you did: not having annulment order is close to having the order?? Everyone advising him to throw her out was misleading anyone in his predicament = very dangerous advice. Police came to his place and told him as much. But if she happened to display more brains&will, then OP would be served with restraining order in the same visit

Close enough. And again the law SingleDad is referring to is only in some localities, it is not US wide so it probably doesn't even apply in this case. And his point in all this debate is what? other than to troll?

[belinda63 3,041]

Order is pending judge's signature which it will have any day now.

Still the question remains: How do you know, or do you, that he lives in an area where that specific law applies and what does it matter?

[SingleDad2usc 71]

If you ignore the fact that he doesn't have the order, no indication of whether the order states she must vacate (and in what period of time), and the fact the police came to the house to tell him he can't do it - then nothing you ever advise on this forum matters

[Merrytooth 5,748]

OP already did what he did.. Good for him, smart move

[SingleDad2usc 71]

This might pass the smart test, if he was planning to instantly give up his apartment anyway. More objectively, OPs move was not smart - but as he reports, his emotions got the better of him...

Anyone who repeats what he did that day should fully expect to be served with a restraining order the next day - and then what he would do? She'd end up staying in the apartment for which his Landlord would hold him liable thru such time as eventually getting her out via court

Edited August 8, 2014 by SingleDad2usc

[Avery Cates 1,141]

And why you are trolling about his irrelevant matter I don't understand except you have nothing better to do than bring a specific law which exists in only certain, specific places and probably not where the OP lives to create chaos in his thread as you usually do. Why do you care how she was removed from or left the house? The point is she is out, he is free, and he goes his way, she goes hers. End of story.

Don't mind him, he has a useless knack for semantics regarding people tragically scumming their way into the country.

[SingleDad2usc 71]

Avery, objective is to post unbiased advice. OP didn't receive much, and also neglected some he did receive. But ultimately, everyone gets out of life what they want: so he should be happy with all of his steps.

At a different level, a reader in a similar predicament should know that they can't just bully someone out of residence. After 30 days, a court order is required - or the police will protect person's rights, no matter the person's status or family relations

[Boiler 45,922]

No doubt a State issue and varies.

[SingleDad2usc 71]

No doubt. But conceptually fair, and shouldn't be neglected without checking