Finally am forced to admit being scammed

[SingleDad2usc 71]

Has anyone tried to move someone out after 31 easily proven days? Without housing court - good luck

[belinda63 3,038]

Divorce is totally different. Usually one party is awarded them residence and the other given a set amount of time to leave. In this case he has an annulment and I am certain he is well within his rights to have her leave HIS residence.

[SingleDad2usc 71]

You are all confusing the issue: a court order is required, before any human can put another human out on the street - if the one thrown out has resided in this location over 30 days. That's the reason, for example, that a motel will not let you book over 4 weeks straight

[belinda63 3,038]

First of all that law is limited to specific areas, it is not US wide. Secondly during a divorce or annulment the awarding of the residence of part of the package. For example my spouse was awarded the house and I was awarded the property inside the house. I had 60 days to vacate (he was not living there anyway due to work). With an annulment things go back to the way they were prior to the marriage, i.e. it was his residence and since the marriage never took place (according to the annulment) it is still his place and she has no rights to be there.

[Caryh 5,206]

She is out but so am I. I was getting only an hour or less of sleep a night for several weeks. I have observed her sneaking outside every time she got a phone call and texting behind the close door of her bedroom. When she thought I was asleep, I found her putting on makeup something she has not done since our wedding., All this to meet another filipina (supposedly). When she left that morning I did something that I never did before, I went snooping in her room. Despite her telling me that she had stop taking birth control pills the second day she was on them, I found 18 missing. These pills can be used as the morning after pill as well, 4 next day and 4 the following day, total of 8 per encounter.8 +8 +2 = 18. Needless to say no sleep that day and I left for work that night to do another 12 1/2 shift. The next morning, I went home , found her asleep, woke here up and told her it was moving day for her. Get out. She left with most of her things and then called the police. They informed me that you can not kick out a spouse from a home. Fine. They escorted her back to get her remaining things and left. That was the last I have heard from her. I have no idea where she is nor do I really care. I know I should have tried to keep my cool but with all of the ####### I took I just could not take it anymore. That is where it stands..

Glad she's out, but there was probably a better way to do it, granted it would have taken longer. Too bad she didn't take the ticket home. But its rather apparent you were just a tool to scam her way into the USA. If she was going to ####### herself out, at least she could have given you a little for all you went through. But maybe its better not, as its easier for you to make a cleaner emotional break.

[SingleDad2usc 71]

You just rehashed my point: "a court order is required". What's the indication OP has such order?

First of all that law is limited to specific areas, it is not US wide. Secondly during a divorce or annulment the awarding of the residence of part of the package. For example my spouse was awarded the house and I was awarded the property inside the house. I had 60 days to vacate (he was not living there anyway due to work). With an annulment things go back to the way they were prior to the marriage, i.e. it was his residence and since the marriage never took place (according to the annulment) it is still his place and she has no rights to be there.

[Caryh 5,206]

You just rehashed my point: "a court order is required". What's the indication OP has such order?

despite what the law might say, it is not uncommon for one party in an ending marriage to demand the other party leave. She's got her things, she can go stay with the guy she's giving it up to. She scammed him and hurt him enough at this point.

[belinda63 3,038]

The "court order" would be part of the court order of the annulment or divorce. Just like there was a COURT ORDER awarding him the house and me the physical property. If you are referring to a court ordered eviction that would be a different matter but irrelevant since the divorce takes precedence over district court. Two courts, sometimes three, Circuit and District is what they are called in Kentucky. And also family which is the same level as circuit. If the Circuit court orders her to leave the home it overrides any order from district court (where the eviction would take place) and acts as an eviction. It is a division of property and determination of rights.

And why you are trolling about his irrelevant matter I don't understand except you have nothing better to do than bring a specific law which exists in only certain, specific places and probably not where the OP lives to create chaos in his thread as you usually do. Why do you care how she was removed from or left the house? The point is she is out, he is free, and he goes his way, she goes hers. End of story.

Edited August 8, 2014 by belinda63

[SingleDad2usc 71]

The issue is confused by you. Where did you get that he has annulment court order? And that such order includes her vacating this rental property? It is precisely because he doesn't have such order, the police told him he can't bully her out. He got EXTREMELY lucky if she terminally moved out of her own will. She could come back with restraining order specifying that he can't order her out, or otherwise harass her

[belinda63 3,038]

What do you think an annulment is? It is a court order dissolving the marriage, or stating it never happened (not that familiar with wordings in annulments). The annulment is a court order.

[SingleDad2usc 71]

He never said he had the order

[Caryh 5,206]

What do you think an annulment is? It is a court order dissolving the marriage, or stating it never happened (not that familiar with wordings in annulments). The annulment is a court order.

papers are in, signed by both with her admitting fraud, but the hearing by the judge has yet to occur.

[belinda63 3,038]

Close enough. And again the law SingleDad is referring to is only in some localities, it is not US wide so it probably doesn't even apply in this case. And his point in all this debate is what? other than to troll?

[palu 23]

I told you to wait for the annulment to be finalized before removing her from the home.

You're only helping her now.

I will be sure to ask permission next time.

There are times when what is the correct way is not always possible and I'm glad I did it. I moved as well and am rid of 3 creeps in one move. I may be wrong but I think a restraining order will not be forthcoming as that would take hired council as well as the fact that I do not know where she is nor whose bed she is occupying at the moment. She also does not know where I am. I also do not think she will go that far for another personal reason.

[Boiler 45,541]

I will be sure to ask permission next time.

There are times when what is the correct way is not always possible and I'm glad I did it. I moved as well and am rid of 3 creeps in one move. I may be wrong but I think a restraining order will not be forthcoming as that would take hired council as well as the fact that I do not know where she is nor whose bed she is occupying at the moment. She also does not know where I am. I also do not think she will go that far for another personal reason.

Result.

That was the way to go.