Supreme Court Rules Some Employers Don't Have to Cover Birth Control

[JohnR! 5,495]

Tell that to Rush Limbaugh and his ilk. He feels fit to call female lawyers who support birth control rights as sluts, regardless of his knowledge of their personal lives or preferences, which kinda highlights where the US is on this issue I don't believe all the rhetoric by any means, on either side, but I do think that a lot of what Hobby Lobby finds objectionable is nothing to do with whether or not women can use a pill to stop an egg from sticking to the vaginal wall and everything to do with them attempting to impose a certain view of sex and sexuality on the wider public.

In all fairness, he is a drug addict, so his opinion is really not something anyone should consider relevant in the least.

[Boiler 45,470]

Those who owe them money, would be a safe guess.

Their policy holders?

[JohnR! 5,495]

Their policy holders?

Educate us, if you should have a point to make.

Edited July 1, 2014 by JohnR!

[Peikko 1,575]

In all fairness, he is a drug addict, so his opinion is really not something anyone should consider relevant in the least.

In all fairness, I never give him a second thought, but I love it when his name comes up in an over the top article about women's rights in the US

[Boiler 45,470]

Educate us, if you should have a point to make.

The people the Insurance Companies get their money from.

You could as equally say that Pharmacy's should hand them out free. Probably makes more sense.

I come back to, you want to voluntarily participate in a social activity and logic suggests that you take precautions to ensure you do not suffer nasty consequences.

If I ride my bike, I take water to avoid dehydration and usually wear a helmet.

No difference.

[JohnR! 5,495]

In all fairness, I never give him a second thought, but I love it when his name comes up in an over the top article about women's rights in the US

He is just a buffoon who outlived his irrelevance. Consider his demographic alone supports the aluminum industry....

[JohnR! 5,495]

The people the Insurance Companies get their money from.

You could as equally say that Pharmacy's should hand them out free. Probably makes more sense.

I come back to, you want to voluntarily participate in a social activity and logic suggests that you take precautions to ensure you do not suffer nasty consequences.

If I ride my bike, I take water to avoid dehydration and usually wear a helmet.

No difference.

I am sure you believe that. Run with it.

[Peikko 1,575]

He is just a buffoon who outlived his irrelevance. Consider his demographic alone supports the aluminum industry....

suddenly, the expansion of the aluminum industry becomes clear. The scales have fallen from my eyes!!!!

[Teddy B 17,252]

Mispost

Edited July 1, 2014 by Teddy B

[JohnR! 5,495]

Mispost

Gesundheit!

[Rich and Wen 101]

I did have a couple of questions, which I will ask of all posters, since I cannot remember and don't wish to trouble myself to figure out who is on what side and who made which point.

1.) If I choose to drink many 24 ounce sodas, and then develop diabetes or become obese with other health problems, then who will pay for my health care?

2.) Is that not the same issue, with the sex part removed?

3.) What would happen if the owners of Hobby Lobby (or someone with similar "religious" beliefs) were to purchase CVS Pharmacies, and then say that the dispensing of certain legal pharmaceuticals is against their beliefs and they refuse to do so?

4.)Can I, as a personal citizen (not a corporation), and holder of certain beliefs, refuse to pay to cover the tax exemptions that the Catholic church enjoys because I am morally opposed to some of their teachings?

That's enough for now.

Discuss

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

He is just a buffoon who outlived his irrelevance. Consider his demographic alone supports the aluminum industry....

B. it was not on MSNBC, Al-Jazerra, Salon,CNN or other left wing approved sources so it is obvious right wing bias ,no matter how many facts they quote

In other words if I don't like your opinions you must be a Buffon

However I demand you not use slang terms to ridicule our Preznit, because we should all be able to disagree with civility

Liberals gosh darn it, they are so cute

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

I did have a couple of questions, which I will ask of all posters, since I cannot remember and don't wish to trouble myself to figure out who is on what side and who made which point.

1.) If I choose to drink many 24 ounce sodas, and then develop diabetes or become obese with other health problems, then who will pay for my health care?

2.) Is that not the same issue, with the sex part removed?

3.) What would happen if the owners of Hobby Lobby (or someone with similar "religious" beliefs) were to purchase CVS Pharmacies, and then say that the dispensing of certain legal pharmaceuticals is against their beliefs and they refuse to do so?

4.)Can I, as a personal citizen (not a corporation), and holder of certain beliefs, refuse to pay to cover the tax exemptions that the Catholic church enjoys because I am morally opposed to some of their teachings?

That's enough for now.

Discuss

1 and 2. Not the same issue at all.

3. Then CVS would not sell certain drugs and if they could survive economically on a select population of backward thinking patrons then so be it.

4. Totally agree, Tax exempt for church is just as much BS as forcing someone to pay for someone else sexual reproduction health choices.

[JohnR! 5,495]

B. it was not on MSNBC, Al-Jazerra, Salon,CNN or other left wing approved sources so it is obvious right wing bias ,no matter how many facts they quote

In other words if I don't like your opinions you must be a Buffon

However I demand you not use slang terms to ridicule our Preznit, because we should all be able to disagree with civility

Liberals gosh darn it, they are so cute

Huh?

[Jacque67 7,328]

I did have a couple of questions, which I will ask of all posters, since I cannot remember and don't wish to trouble myself to figure out who is on what side and who made which point.

1.) If I choose to drink many 24 ounce sodas, and then develop diabetes or become obese with other health problems, then who will pay for my health care?

2.) Is that not the same issue, with the sex part removed?

3.) What would happen if the owners of Hobby Lobby (or someone with similar "religious" beliefs) were to purchase CVS Pharmacies, and then say that the dispensing of certain legal pharmaceuticals is against their beliefs and they refuse to do so?

4.)Can I, as a personal citizen (not a corporation), and holder of certain beliefs, refuse to pay to cover the tax exemptions that the Catholic church enjoys because I am morally opposed to some of their teachings?

That's enough for now.

Discuss

4. You should be able to.

Temples are free from tax here in Japan ...sigh. (Doctors were as well until recently)