Jump to content
SingleDad2usc

Women are more likely to be verbally/physically aggressive

 Share

89 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline

http://www.news-medical.net/news/20140626/Women-are-more-likely-to-be-physically-aggressive-towards-their-partners-than-men.aspx

Women are more likely to be physically aggressive towards their partners than men

Published on June 26, 2014 at 6:03 AM · No Comments

inShare

3

Women are more likely to be verbally and physically aggressive towards their partners than men suggests a new study presented as part of a symposium on intimate partner violence (IPV).

The symposium 'Developments in Intimate Partner Violence Research and Practice' is presented today, Wednesday 25 June, at the British Psychological Society's Division of Forensic Psychology annual conference in Glasgow.

Dr Elizabeth Bates from the University of Cumbria and colleagues from the University of Central Lancashire gave a total of 1104 students (706 women and 398 men) questionnaires about their physical aggression and controlling behaviour, to partners and to same-sex others (including friends).

Analysis showed that women were more likely to be physically aggressive to their partners than men and that men were more likely to be physically aggressive to their same-sex others.

Furthermore, women engaged in significantly higher levels of controlling behaviour than men, which significantly predicted physical aggression in both sexes.

Dr Elizabeth Bates explained: "This was an interesting finding. Previous studies have sought to explain male violence towards women as rising from patriarchal values, which motivate men to seek to control women's behaviour, using violence if necessary.

"This study found that women demonstrated a desire to control their partners and were more likely to use physical aggression than men. This suggests that IPV may not be motivated by patriarchal values and needs to be studied within the context of other forms of aggression, which has potential implications for interventions."

Other papers presented in the symposium are as follows:

'Inner Strength Domestic Violence Programme' - Dr Nichola Graham-Kevan (University of Central Lancashire & Mid Sweden University)

'Men's experiences of victimisation from a female intimate partner: An international study' - Louise Dixon (University of Birmingham).

'Reasons for engaging in conflict within and outside of relationships: A comparison of women's responses' - Abi Thornton, (University of Bolton), Nichola Graham-Kevan (University of Central Lancashire) & J. Archer.

'Literature review: Men's Experience of Domestic Abuse' - Brian Dempsey (University of Dundee).

Source:

http://www.bps.org.uk/events/conferences/division-forensic-psychology-annual-conference-2014

Currently rated 3.7 by 11 people

Currently 3.7/5 Stars.12345

Posted in: Medical Research News | Women's Health News | Healthcare News

Tags: Forensic, Psychology

Permalink | Comments (0)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

Sorry for you if you have been abused by your wife. Is there any help you needed for your case? If so, ask for help now otherwise, you must have posted in a wrong thread/forum. I hope the moderator move your post as fast as possible because it has an element of discrimination against women and added little or no value to people who need help here. Thank you for the awareness though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, I mean really? Probably most of female respondents of this study are well-trained martial art. Did they check statistics how many women are victims of domestic violence?

Know your enemy and know yourself and you can fight a hundred battles without disaster.Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat

- Sun Tzu-

It doesn't matter how slow you go as long as you don't stop

-Confucius-

 

-I am the beneficiary and my post is not reflecting my petitioner's point of views-

 

                                       Lifting Condition (I-751)

 

*Mailed I-751 package (06/21/2017) to CSC

*NOA-1 date (06/23/2017)

*NOA-1 received (06/28/2017)

*Check cashed (06/27/2017)

*Biometric Received (07/10/2017)

*Biometric Appointment (07/20/2017)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

Thanks for your concern, onye. I'm all set. The article is scientific, as opposed to your subjective note. The article may be of extreme importance to male victims of DV and their advocates - so it wouldn't do much fairness to try and shut them up.

On a quite more constructive note: some of the findings here are counter-intuitive, if not revolutionary. I'd be much interested if someone came up with scientific data that debunks these findings

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your concern, onye. I'm all set. The article is scientific, as opposed to your subjective note. The article may be of extreme importance to male victims of DV and their advocates - so it wouldn't do much fairness to try and shut them up.

On a quite more constructive note: some of the findings here are counter-intuitive, if not revolutionary. I'd be much interested if someone came up with scientific data that debunks these findings

Even I don't believe it. But agree this does happen more than reported.

Edited by BBCC

Done: I-130/CR-1, I-751/ROC

Done: I-327

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

I don't know the significance of your "even"; but again, these scientific conclusions are new and counter-intuitive. I'd like to NOT believe their research, too. So I encourage anyone interested in the matter to further research and produce scientific evidence to the contrary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Much as I am not against your post, I strongly feel it was posted here to cause distractions and pitch the female folks against their male counterpart in the debate you intended by your post.

Agree with you. This post is nothing to do with immigration to the US. He should've posted on off topic sub-forum. Or MODs moved to the appropriate sub-forum.

Edited by Girl from Celebes

Know your enemy and know yourself and you can fight a hundred battles without disaster.Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat

- Sun Tzu-

It doesn't matter how slow you go as long as you don't stop

-Confucius-

 

-I am the beneficiary and my post is not reflecting my petitioner's point of views-

 

                                       Lifting Condition (I-751)

 

*Mailed I-751 package (06/21/2017) to CSC

*NOA-1 date (06/23/2017)

*NOA-1 received (06/28/2017)

*Check cashed (06/27/2017)

*Biometric Received (07/10/2017)

*Biometric Appointment (07/20/2017)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

What do you want to debunk? Do we have men who are voilent and abusive to their wife/partner? If we do, what is the benefit of knowing who abuse more than the other? Unless you are claiming that verbal abuse are exlusive to the female folks only, which of course cannot be. Your post is not needed in this forum for crying out loud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

Absolutely wrong: these new scientific findings have equally as much to do with Effects of Major Family Changes on Immigration Benefits as any of the hundreds other topics. Read the article: this is a new scientific study of Domestic Violence, domestic partner control and disagreements. This is precisely pertinent to almost all couples starting out their new life together in the US - where one of them is in sponsoring function.

It's way too easy to be closing eyes on scientific studies, and to be putting own spin on forum. The controversial conclusions of this study deserve heed - or deserve debunking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely wrong: these new scientific findings have equally as much to do with Effects of Major Family Changes on Immigration Benefits as any of the hundreds other topics. Read the article: this is a new scientific study of Domestic Violence, domestic partner control and disagreements. This is precisely pertinent to almost all couples starting out their new life together in the US - where one of them is in sponsoring function.

It's way too easy to be closing eyes on scientific studies, and to be putting own spin on forum. The controversial conclusions of this study deserve heed - or deserve debunking

No one is close their eyes of the study as far as my concern. The other poster and I are simply stated that this post is not related to immigration to the US. If the study is about " women are more likely to be verbally/psychically aggressive toward their partners in term of immigration to the US" I would completely agree that you have already posted on appropriate sub-forum.

Edited by Girl from Celebes

Know your enemy and know yourself and you can fight a hundred battles without disaster.Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat

- Sun Tzu-

It doesn't matter how slow you go as long as you don't stop

-Confucius-

 

-I am the beneficiary and my post is not reflecting my petitioner's point of views-

 

                                       Lifting Condition (I-751)

 

*Mailed I-751 package (06/21/2017) to CSC

*NOA-1 date (06/23/2017)

*NOA-1 received (06/28/2017)

*Check cashed (06/27/2017)

*Biometric Received (07/10/2017)

*Biometric Appointment (07/20/2017)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

...as in DV scientific study (that, incidentally, calls to re-think intervention approaches) is irrelevant to USCIS self-petitioners and advocates?

I'll give you an easy example: VAWA, of course, is pertinent. Do you know how many men DO NOT self-petition just because of the act's name? Or how many people out there think in sarcastic tones about such male petition? The impact of blind (to science) attitude is huge.

Edited by SingleDad2usc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

Wait a minute! Men and women USCs bring their spouses to the State. Are you inferring that women are the only abusers of their spouses and men are not? I will be interest in a solution to domestic abuse rather than trying to ridicule women folks as abusers and make the men innocent. This post has no help here I repeat! Off topic forum or elsewhere will be more appropiete for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...