The who should be Mod and Mod Issues Thread

[Peikko 1,575]

Still, what is the reason a few believe this corner of the forum need special moderation? It doesn't seem to be a universal notion by any definition.

Agreed, and as for nominating members who think other members ruin every thread they post in, what can I say? Not my definition of impartial and fair minded.

[Novembro 1,763]

Hem hem.

Obvious choice.

For whatever is the polar opposite of a mod.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

I dunno, I don't think people here are that bad.

Thats because you don't have an evil heart/. You really don't think people would vote against a post because of the poster or subject ?

[spookyturtle 9,465]

Thats because you don't have an evil heart/. You really don't think people would vote against a post because of the poster or subject ?

Of course they would, that's why the down vote was taken away. The up vote has become the same. If a woman posts, the other 3 women and a couple of girly men +1 the post. When the real men post, sometimes the other real men +1, other times they don't. Because that's the way real men do things.

[Peikko 1,575]

Thats because you don't have an evil heart/. You really don't think people would vote against a post because of the poster or subject ?

The poster? No, but the subject of the post? Absolutely, that's the point.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Still, what is the reason a few believe this corner of the forum need special moderation? It doesn't seem to be a universal notion by any definition.

well honestly I do agree a bit. Since we voiced our concerns and they were kind enough to really listen it has gotten better, I do think most of the problem was new mods who did not understand the dynamics. I don't know that we have to have a new mod, I think Tbone and Charles know most of us fairly well. Kathryn can be reasonable when you talk to her they way, you wish to be talked to. Krikat seems fair enough although I have not seem then in action much. The rest I have not dealt with or could not recommend

Of course they would, that's why the down vote was taken away. The up vote has become the same. If a woman posts, the other 3 women and a couple of girly men +1 the post. When the real men post, sometimes the other real men +1, other times they don't. Because that's the way real men do things.

shall I identify the gang of 7. The women who band together and the men that fall all over everything thy say no matter how asine?

[Peikko 1,575]

Of course they would, that's why the down vote was taken away. The up vote has become the same. If a woman posts, the other 3 women and a couple of girly men +1 the post. When the real men post, sometimes the other real men +1, other times they don't. Because that's the way real men do things.

Real men and girly men? Is this humour? I don't get it if it is.

[spookyturtle 9,465]

shall I identify the gang of 7. The women who band together and the men that fall all over everything thy say no matter how asine?

No need to. In their unbiased minds they know who they are.

[Darnell 8,478]

.b.b.

Edited June 13, 2014 by Darnell

[Darnell 8,478]

Still, what is the reason a few believe this corner of the forum need special moderation? It doesn't seem to be a universal notion by any definition.

oh - thats easy -

have pointed moderation here for CEHST

and only here for CEHST

due to a relaxation of the ToS for CEHST.

(I hope you all not forget that one bit)

Edited June 13, 2014 by Darnell

[Karee 4,190]

I cast my vote for Mr. Big Dog.

[spookyturtle 9,465]

I cast my vote for Mr. Big Dog.

Throw in Gary too and it's a sealed deal.

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

I cast my vote for Mr. Big Dog.

I second the motion. It would Daily Currant and GOP satire all day!

[Karee 4,190]

Throw in Gary too and it's a sealed deal.

Haven't seen Gary in a while. He's probably fighting the good fight in Eastern Ukraine. Not sure which side he's on though.

Edited June 13, 2014 by Karee

[Novembro 1,763]

Throw in Gary too and it's a sealed deal.

Speaking to my inner hateful-conservative.