The who should be Mod and Mod Issues Thread

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Was I just thread banned? If I was, good job moderators.

From which thread?

[DavenRoxy 1,073]

If you believe that, I have some magic beans I think you'd be interested in.

Enjoy your own fairy-tale world. Wherever that may be...

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2014/06/robert-farago/google-ban-ammo-ads/

http://reason.com/blog/2014/06/30/google-may-soon-ban-ads-for-fake-guns-fo

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Enjoy your own fairy-tale world. Wherever that may be...

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2014/06/robert-farago/google-ban-ammo-ads/

http://reason.com/blog/2014/06/30/google-may-soon-ban-ads-for-fake-guns-fo

Google isn't going anywhere dude. A few gun enthusiasts who will be deprived of gun PPC ads on search pages isn't going to change anything Edited June 30, 2014 by Hail Ming!

[Peikko 1,575]

From which thread?

Well, if I am it's now invisible to me, which is the message that I got when I tried to add a little bit of relish to my post. It's the one that suggested that something that was posted was a bit of a tirade on the subject of laziness and unemployment. I was a bit shocked by the phrase that someone who shall remain nameless had risen above average by getting a job and that he shouldn't worry about anyone that hasn't got a job because they haven't got one because they are lazy. I have probably said too much if I am thread banned

I would like a warning so that I can complain about it though, that would be cool

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Well, if I am it's now invisible to me, which is the message that I got when I tried to add a little bit of relish to my post. It's the one that suggested that something that was posted was a bit of a tirade on the subject of laziness and unemployment. I was a bit shocked by the phrase that someone who shall remain nameless had risen above average by getting a job and that he shouldn't worry about anyone that hasn't got a job because they haven't got one because they are lazy. I have probably said too much if I am thread banned

If you're thread banned you still see the topic in the list. It just says you can't view it.

That thread was probably taken down by the mods.

[Peikko 1,575]

Google isn't going anywhere dude. A few gun enthusiasts who will be deprived of gun PPC ads on search pages isn't going to change anything

I don't get that at all. Why would anyone be annoyed about the lack of adverts? I'm all for an advert free online experience. Ban the lot!

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I don't get that at all. Why would anyone be annoyed about the lack of adverts? I'm all for an advert free online experience. Ban the lot!

Probably because the shock jocks inflate the issue into one of significance for small minded people who need to be told what to feel angry about. Edited June 30, 2014 by Hail Ming!

[Peikko 1,575]

If you're thread banned you still see the topic in the list. It just says you can't view it.

That thread was probably taken down by the mods.

Nothing personal then? I hope no one got into trouble over it. I don't think there was malice behind it, just an inability to split the idea that there are a high percentage of unemployed in one community and therefore that is necessarily a result of laziness as if all unemployment is a lack of self motivation and not the fact that, if you do the math, there are actually not enough jobs to go around. It's a numerical fact and not something I made up to protect the lazy.

[DavenRoxy 1,073]

Was I just thread banned? If I was, good job moderators.

No, someone reported it. All hail...

If you're thread banned you still see the topic in the list. It just says you can't view it.

That thread was probably taken down by the mods.

Thanks to some FAST reporting. Go gunslinger!!

Edited June 30, 2014 by DavenRoxy

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Nothing personal then? I hope no one got into trouble over it. I don't think there was malice behind it, just an inability to split the idea that there are a high percentage of unemployed in one community and therefore that is necessarily a result of laziness as if all unemployment is a lack of self motivation and not the fact that, if you do the math, there are actually not enough jobs to go around. It's a numerical fact and not something I made up to protect the lazy.

No, but it just goes to show that some posters post clearly bigoted things and can't seem to understand that they are bigoted.

With that OP you're not going to get anything approaching a reasonable discussion.

No, someone reported it. All hail...

Thanks to some FAST reporting. Go gunslinger!!

There are quite a lot of active posters dude. Personally I would have enjoyed handing your @rse to you for that one

[DavenRoxy 1,073]

Google isn't going anywhere dude. A few gun enthusiasts who will be deprived of gun PPC ads on search pages isn't going to change anything

Susej Tsirhc your comprehension is way off, isn't it? I never said Joogle was going anywhere. I said they are (proposing) to ban gun, ammo, and weapon ads. To INCLUDE toy guns. Sure, it's just the adverts now. But what next? Actual searches? Who knows. Oh that's right, you do. Cuz you are wise.

No, wait, that's not it, AT ALL.

No, but it just goes to show that some posters post clearly bigoted things and can't seem to understand that they are bigoted.

With that OP you're not going to get anything approaching a reasonable discussion.

There are quite a lot of active posters dude. Personally I would have enjoyed handing your @rse to you for that one

But you could not, because I was not wrong, and you don't have what it takes. You are just a one-line wacko with little content or merit to your posts. That's why so many on here have you ignored.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Susej Tsirhc your comprehension is way off, isn't it? I never said Joogle was going anywhere. I said they are (proposing) to ban gun, ammo, and weapon ads. To INCLUDE toy guns. Sure, it's just the adverts now. But what next? Actual searches? Who knows. Oh that's right, you do. Cuz you are wise.

No, wait, that's not it, AT ALL.

'Joogle' eh? Classy.

Google change their search algorithm all the time. Personally I'd be more outraged that they set up in China and helped the communist government censor their own people. But different strokes eh?

Susej Tsirhc your comprehension is way off, isn't it? I never said Joogle was going anywhere. I said they are (proposing) to ban gun, ammo, and weapon ads. To INCLUDE toy guns. Sure, it's just the adverts now. But what next? Actual searches? Who knows. Oh that's right, you do. Cuz you are wise.

No, wait, that's not it, AT ALL.

But you could not, because I was not wrong, and you don't have what it takes. You are just a one-line wacko with little content or merit to your posts. That's why so many on here have you ignored.

You are being unbelievably childish.

In point of fact though you did say 'Joogle' was going the the way of the dodo bird (ie extinct). How was my interpretation of this statement wrong?

Edited July 1, 2014 by Hail Ming!

[DavenRoxy 1,073]

Joogle is banning gun ads, ammo ads... guess they are going the way of the dodo bird just as VJ is...

'Joogle' eh? Classy.

In point of fact though you did say 'Joogle' was going the the way of the dodo bird (ie extinct). How was my interpretation of this statement wrong?

Hay naku. As in becoming so "family friendly" that we will soon have more #### and ### when we talk about ######## or ###### and #######.

"G" can be hard or soft. "Guh" or "J" sound. It's known as a pun, a play on words.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Fine. I was right, you were wrong and your ego can't take it so you're acting like a child. I get it.

I'm sure others will too.

Edited July 1, 2014 by Hail Ming!

[DavenRoxy 1,073]

Fine. I was right, you were wrong and your ego can't take it so you're acting like a child. I get it.

I'm sure others will too.

Doubtless the "it's not fair we keep getting called bigots" cheerleaders squad will be along soon to wipe away the tears.

Right about WHAT exactly? We were not debating an issue where either of us were right or wrong, so you saying that I am wrong and you are right makes no sense at all.

Your ability to throw out an unending array of one-liners that ridicule other posters, but provides about ZERO input to the topic at hand is your trademark move. However, that in and of itself does not make you right about anything. Perhaps you should change your MO to one of salient replies. Oh wait...