Jump to content
The Nature Boy

The who should be Mod and Mod Issues Thread

By The Nature Boy in Current Events and Hot Social Topics

 Share

1,238 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Peikko Grand Master

Peikko   1,575

Posted
Filed: K-3 Visa Timeline
Posted

I don't hate you, The Truth.

So by definition, it is not universal.

Don't you recognise hyperbole when you see it? Besides, it was my ever so transparent attempt to make a stupid point. I think I win :thumbs:

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

JohnR!
JohnR!

Truth. You are both correct, all the while you seem to leave out the fact this is still a private forum and in a way, as Kathryn (?) explained in another thread, it is gauged and evaluated by its con

We Keep Receipts
We Keep Receipts

So that's how it is. I thought she was Val eri as well. Didn't think about Gegel. But Penny and NB? Pure Comedy gold. Here's a secret: When I'm feeling frisky, I log into my other account, Lostinblue

Harpa Timsah
Harpa Timsah

VJ exists for clickies to boost pageview numbers, so ad space can cost more. We're all pawns in a money scheme. This forum makes lots of clickies. The end.

TBoneTX Grand Master

TBoneTX   45,002

Posted
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
 Timeline
Posted (edited)

Hopefully they argue a bunch, settle on someone, and that someone declines.

Huh? Why?

1. T-Bone was the last addition right?

2. Did he fill a vacated spot or was he part of an expansion?

1. TBoneTX and Ryan_H were added simultaneously.

2. Expansion.

He was elected by popular vote. Si man!

Or, if seen in the forest by the trees, by poplar vote, tree man.

1. Who's the current organizers?

2. Don't they typically pull from that pool?

1. AJ posted them accurately (Jasman died some time ago but continues to be listed as a tribute).

2. Typically yes, but if this time proves to be different, it will be very positive indeed, and I think that everyone who's involved (including the regular members) will gain from it and enjoy it. Whoever's picked or initially approached can feel assured of unqualified endorsement and support.

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Peikko Grand Master

Peikko   1,575

Posted
Filed: K-3 Visa Timeline
Posted

If you did your part and attempted to get along better like most everyone else has, that wouldn't be the case at all, would it?

What, you mean virtual flirting with the male members and acting girlie? No thanks.

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites
spookyturtle Grand Master

spookyturtle   9,465

Posted
Timeline
Posted

What, you mean virtual flirting with the male members and acting girlie? No thanks.

That's not what I meant at all. I didn't post that as a dig or an insult, just a suggestion as many have done to try to make things run smoother here and for the most part it is working.

R.I.P Spooky 2004-2015

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Peikko Grand Master

Peikko   1,575

Posted
Filed: K-3 Visa Timeline
Posted

That's not what I meant at all. I didn't post that as a dig or an insult, just a suggestion as many have done to try to make things run smoother here and for the most part it is working.

See, you really can't be objective towards my posts. That wasn't intended to be a serious comment. I thought it was funny, hahaha. You didn't, you thought I was being serious. Yes, I am agressive in the pursuit of some of my points of view and yes my posts can be facetious and deliberately provocative at times, but I am by no means the only one who does that, although everyone has a different way of going about it. I find it amusing when you say you are impartial when making your posts towards me. Sometimes that's true and sometimes, as now, that's complete rubbish. You post about/to me the way you do because of your perception of who I am and it's not based on everything I post just based on specific posts that you find irritating. It is what it is, I don't even care how you perceive me to be (I know, I should care, totally the wrong attitude, my bad) but your constant 'I'm impartial, I am saying things how they are' is equally galling to me. There you go, have at it.

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SMOKE Mentor

SMOKE   1,426

Posted
Filed: Timeline
Posted

I've got an idea....no it didn't hurt either.

If we're in need of another mod. how about ewok & the mods get some candidate names together. then send out an anonymous response email, like ewok has done in the past for votes. then disregard the results and pick someone they think will be a good mod & just lie to us about the voting results.

7yqZWFL.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Teddy B Grand Master

Teddy B   17,251

Posted
Filed: Lift. Cond. (apr) Country: Canada
 Timeline
Posted

eric will never be mod for the same reason i will never be mod.

Neither one of you can manage to hold onto an account for more than 6 months?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TBoneTX Grand Master

TBoneTX   45,002

Posted
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
 Timeline
Posted

Because it would be funny.

Har, man.

If we're in need of another mod. how about ewok & the mods get some candidate names together. then send out an anonymous response email, like ewok has done in the past for votes. then disregard the results and pick someone they think will be a good mod & just lie to us about the voting results.

:lol:

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jacque67 Grand Master

Jacque67   7,328

Posted
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
 Timeline
Posted

See, you really can't be objective towards my posts. That wasn't intended to be a serious comment. I thought it was funny, hahaha. You didn't, you thought I was being serious. Yes, I am agressive in the pursuit of some of my points of view and yes my posts can be facetious and deliberately provocative at times, but I am by no means the only one who does that, although everyone has a different way of going about it. I find it amusing when you say you are impartial when making your posts towards me. Sometimes that's true and sometimes, as now, that's complete rubbish. You post about/to me the way you do because of your perception of who I am and it's not based on everything I post just based on specific posts that you find irritating. It is what it is, I don't even care how you perceive me to be (I know, I should care, totally the wrong attitude, my bad) but your constant 'I'm impartial, I am saying things how they are' is equally galling to me. There you go, have at it.

You go, girl!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...