Creationist asks ‘hard question’: ‘If evolution is true, is rape wrong?’

[spookyturtle 9,466]

Test

#######

#######

Wow! The medical words ,the words doctors use, are now blacklisted.

How about childish terms like vajayjay and weiner?

Allowed. Nice.

[Jacque67 7,328]

But we have free will, so the choice is ours.

Wow! You think we have free will???????

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Test

#######

#######

Wow! The medical words ,the words doctors use, are now blacklisted.

How about childish terms like vajayjay and weiner?

Allowed. Nice.

They will be coming for your Vajayjay and Weiner now.

That Monkey and Schlong can't be far behind

[Pooky 3,786]

They will be coming for your Vajayjay and Weiner now.

That must never take our Schnitzel!

[spookyturtle 9,466]

Wow! You think we have free will???????

Of course we do. Even when we make no choice, that is a choice.

[Jacque67 7,328]

Of course we do. Even when we make no choice, that is a choice.

Lol!

If that is what keeps you going, fine.

Pass on some of that free will- I need it!

[spookyturtle 9,466]

Lol!

If that is what keeps you going, fine.

Pass on some of that free will- I need it!

Free will is there whether you believe or not. I don't see it as a religious thing at all. We all make choices in life, good and bad. If we do nothing, we made the choice to do nothing.

[Jacque67 7,328]

Free will is there whether you believe or not. I don't see it as a religious thing at all. We all make choices in life, good and bad. If we do nothing, we made the choice to do nothing.

I am not talking about religion so I guesss I am going of topic. Mea culpa.

Free will does exist in theory, but few possess it IMO.

[spookyturtle 9,466]

I am not talking about religion so I guesss I am going of topic. Mea culpa.

Free will does exist in theory, but few possess it IMO.

I think we all possess it, and we all use it, consciously or not. Remember, by not making a decision on something, you actually did make a decision.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Of course we do. Even when we make no choice, that is a choice.

That's a Rush song

[GandD 5,966]

That's a Rush song

Yeah it is. Well done.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Why is the focus of discussion on what rape is?

Have you forgotten the nutty premise this creationist has put forth?

Surely some emphasis should be put on the argument rather than seeming to imply that somehow he might be right because a few people can't agree on what rape is.

[mota bhai 2,675]

They will be coming for your Vajayjay and Weiner now.

That Monkey and Schlong can't be far behind

They can take my weiner but they will never take my freedommmmmmmmmmmm!

[Darnell 8,478]

By Travis Gettys

Wednesday, June 11, 2014 8:55 EDT

Creationist Darek Isaacs said during an online broadcast posted Monday that evolutionary theory excused rape.

He said during an episode of “Creation Today” that he had studied works by Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, E.O. Wilson, and other “purveyors of evolutionary thought” and found himself in “a very, very dark place,” reported the Friendly Atheist blog.

“You have to start asking questions: Well, if evolution is true, and it’s just all about the male propagating their DNA, we had to ask hard questions, like, well, is rape wrong?” Isaacs said, as one of his hosts gasps.

Isaacs is the author of “Dragons or Dinosaurs?” ... which argues that ancient myths about dragons were based on human interactions with dinosaurs.

...

“According to the evolutionary worldview, [if] that male is strong enough and he had wonderful genes, he should propagate his DNA as much as possible so that the species can progress,” Isaacs said. “So it redefines everything about our society.”

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/06/11/creationist-asks-hard-question-if-evolution-is-true-is-rape-wrong/

i don't have any issue discussing Neanderthals and the raping done - or even ANY raping done prior to the birth of Jesus Christ.

rape as an evolutionary tool for hardier DNA propagation seemed to be all the rage, in those time-slices - but

A Creationist? One that claims 'God Created All' ? They disavow the Neanderthal and Darwinism, usually - so it's sorta hard to be on point when they try to use rape as a method for hardy DNA propagation during the listed time references in the Bible.

Maybe there was more to the story - but if'n they not accept the time slices and time lines from Evolutionary Stuff - then any rape-conjectures scatter into other noise. Yes, Really. Can't be proving up B if no one accepts A...