Obama Could Be Facing 10 Years To Life In Prison…

[Teddy B 17,252]

Lessee: Susan Rice, who only seems adept at lying. Tim Geithner, who couldn't do his own taxes without cheating on 'em. Hillary Clinton, who has no accomplishments to speak of as Secretary of State; in fact our international relationships with traditional allies have never been worse. AG Holder, who's so busy doling out injustice they oughta just change the name of his department, Joe Biden, who really needs a straightjacket. Jay Carney, who gave Baghdad Bob a run for his money.

The preznit himself is the perfect example of the no-experience resume: The only pre-public service job he ever held, he whined he felt he was "behind enemy lines" . These folks have led lives protected from reality and have been running (actually "ruining" is more appropriate) the country by theory. No personal experience to inform them.

You are sure that these people were involved in the decision to make the prisoner swap? Are you sure there were no military personnel involved in this decision?

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Of course I read it to the end. You seem incapable of posting without an attempt to insult. Apparently one of your weaknesses.

While the opinions of flacks & hacks may differ, Congress and the American people are outraged by what this preznit has tried to sneak by them (and yes, even including that poll you tried to misrepresent as saying the public was "split")

The terminology regarding the poll came straight off the article I quoted. Don't like the rules, go complain to the moderation.

As to your flacks and hacks - that is a good description of what largely sits in Congress these days.

You are sure that these people were involved in the decision to make the prisoner swap? Are you sure there were no military personnel involved in this decision?

Tim Geithner and Hillary Clinton did it. You know that.

[Leatherneck 693]

I highly recommend you invest in your own computer and internet connection (instead of you constantly using the public library's) so I don't have to look all this stuff up for you.

From TIME magazine, lefty fish-wrap if ever there was:

Plenty more sources, if you need more spoon-feeding.

Hey, it's a nice warm summer day, grab a cold glass of lemonade and sit on the patio -- enjoy the moment. Go to the beach, have a late lunch, mow the lawn, wash the car, etc. Your time would be better spent.

You think any of the Obama supporters here will make an unequivocal admission that Obama broke the current law, forget it!

Section 1035(d) of the 2014 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) is pretty easy to understand.

[Teddy B 17,252]

Tim Geithner and Hillary Clinton did it. You know that.

It's comical how folks just throw shyt against the wall and hope that it will stick. Rather than Unclebeer just say he made an exaggerated statement and really isn't sure who was involved in the decision, we'll have about two pages of posturing and avoidance. That's how the real men do it yanno, not like that pipsqueak Obama and his know nothing crew.

Edited June 10, 2014 by Teddy B

[JohnR! 5,495]

Hey, it's a nice warm summer day, grab a cold glass of lemonade and sit on the patio -- enjoy the moment. Go to the beach, have a late lunch, mow the lawn, wash the car, etc. Your time would be better spent.

You think any of the Obama supporters here will make an unequivocal admission that Obama broke the current law, forget it!

Section 1035(d) of the 2014 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) is pretty easy to understand.

True, but you would have to convince some to read it before posting and IMHO we have evidence to support the notion that ship has long ago set sail.

[Novembro 1,763]

Love, Novembro, Love.

WHAT IS LOVE?

Now that I don't know. All I know is that Law is made up by the preznit who is all-knowing and also the anti-christ.

[UncleBeer 244]

You are sure that these people were involved in the decision to make the prisoner swap?

If the 'requirement' for you to quit trolling me is that I name which of the preznit's lackeys participated in the decision, I'd say this: since he didn't bother informing the head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, I'd say it's a pretty well kept (aka: illegally-kept) secret.

Are you sure there were no military personnel involved in this decision?

I'f you'd read the link I posted, it said the advice of virtually all US military & security personnel was ignored in the planning of this "bargain".

[Teddy B 17,252]

If the 'requirement' for you to quit trolling me is that I name which of the preznit's lackeys participated in the decision, I'd say this: since he didn't bother informing the head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, I'd say it's a pretty well kept (aka: illegally-kept) secret.

I'f you'd read the link I posted, it said the advice of virtually all US military & security personnel was ignored in the planning of this "bargain".

So you admit you don't have a clue who was involved in the decision and what details went into the decision making. In turn your statement that "The preznit and his crew of no-experience experts saw fit to put them back on the battlefield anyway.", is a complete fabrication and simply hogwash.

See that wasn't so hard, was it? It's refreshing to be honest, isn't it?

[UncleBeer 244]

So you admit you don't have a clue who was involved in the decision and what details went into the decision making. In turn your statement that "The preznit and his crew of no-experience experts saw fit to put them back on the battlefield anyway.", is a complete fabrication and simply hogwash.

I said no such thing. As I say (do you read these links, or do you just hurry right on to trolling?), the preznit is now busy throwing Hagel under the bus for the decision. Ultimately though, responsibility for the decision rests with the preznit.

Try reading before trolling, eh?

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

You are sure that these people were involved in the decision to make the prisoner swap? Are you sure there were no military personnel involved in this decision?

You think there may have been some Military involved. Surely you jest

[Teddy B 17,252]

You think there may have been some Military involved. Surely you jest

Unclebeer doesn't seem to think so. Comical, isn't it?

[ready4ONE 5,400]

Of course I read it to the end. You seem incapable of posting without an attempt to insult. Apparently one of your weaknesses.

While the opinions of flacks & hacks may differ, Congress and the American people are outraged by what this preznit has tried to sneak by them (and yes, even including that poll you tried to misrepresent as saying the public was "split")

Some of the American people aren't upset about it at all, beyond annoyance with the never ending attempts to constantly blow everything that Obama does or doesn't do into hysterical caterwalling about the destruction of Merka by said actions or inactions. Merka isn't that delicate.

[Peikko 1,575]

I would like to know what battlefield these capable militants are going to be thrown back down on. Anyone any suggestions?

Personally, I think the Taliban are just as likely to lynch them as embrace them warmly back into the bosom of their ogranisation, but that's just me, someone who fails to see how these miscreants can be lynchpins of an organisation like the Taliban

[JohnR! 5,495]

Some of the American people aren't upset about it at all, beyond annoyance with the never ending attempts to constantly blow everything that Obama does or doesn't do into hysterical caterwalling about the destruction of Merka by said actions or inactions. Merka isn't that delicate.

The only people who are upset are those who are listening to the talking heads and their vitriol against our troops. What a pathetic bunch...

[Karee 4,190]

Watching the Obama supporters here fall over each other, convincing each other that there's nothing wrong with what the president did is fricking hilarious.

I guess if you tell yourself the sky is orange, and someone backs you up on that craziness, then it must be true.