Jump to content
Janelle2002

Americans Would Rather Do Business With White People Than Black People

 Share

80 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Of course I wouldn't meet anyone that talked in slang regardless of their color. The original article talked about showing their skin color only.

Sure, as a black person many people hold me responsible for what other black people do all the time. That's why we constantly have to hear this 13% of the population 50% of the crimes mess because people like to use this crutch as an excuse to discriminate against black people as if 13% of the black population is committing crimes.

Thank you for saying that, because I did exactly that the other day. I felt guilty about telling the kid the rims were sold, and did a lot of introspection, but in the end I have to put my families safety first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for saying that, because I did exactly that the other day. I felt guilty about telling the kid the rims were sold, and did a lot of introspection, but in the end I have to put my families safety first.

So did the article say the black people called the buyers and talked slang?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So did the article say the black people called the buyers and talked slang?

Dear god woman, we are on page 4.. OP's are irrelevant by page 3.. You aren't new here :dancing:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Thailand
Timeline

The wrongly convicted issue is a concern. There are many possible reasons for it, not least that black people are often badly represented. This says more about the justice system than it does about racism to me though. I am sure in the past there were lots of wrongful convictions based on irrational fears of black people, but I don't think that's the most commonplace reason now. I think the mos common reason is poor representation in a system that is rather flawed in how it presents criminals in court.

Again I think that comes down to a financial issue more than a racial issue. The justice system is really, really rigged against people with no money in this country. Especially when it comes to getting a decent lawyer and being treated fairly by the courts. I've seen glaring examples of this in my personal life, and it had little do with race except for the fact that minorities are less like to be able to afford a decent lawyer, or a lawyer at all, due to their financial situation.

I'll give you an example of this problem. In the Federal courts here in the Northern District of Texas they rely on court appointed attorneys rather than a public defenders office. (At least that's how it was in the 80s.) Other federal court jurisdictions had public defenders on staff at ll times who's sole purpose was to defend indigent defendants. On the surface the difference may not seem like a big difference, but it is. In order to practice law in the federal courts in this district, you have to put your name in that hat for that court appointed attorney pool.

So the question becomes, if you're an indigent defendant, would you rather have someone defending you who's full time job is representing indigent clients, or some guy that HAS to do it, and is getting paid 5% of his normal hourly rate? In the latter case it's best for that lawyer to do everything he can to dispose of the case quickly (plea bargain) whether the person he is representing is guilty or not.

Edited by Karee

You can click on the 'X' to the right to ignore this signature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again I think that comes down to a financial issue more than a racial issue. The justice system is really, really rigged against people with no money in this country. Especially when it comes to getting a decent lawyer and being treated fairly by the courts. I've seen glaring examples of this in my personal life, and it had little do with race except for the fact that minorities are less like to be able to afford a decent lawyer, or a lawyer at all, due to their financial situation.

I'll giv you an example of this problem. In the Federal courts here in the Northern District of Texas they rely on court appointed attorneys rather than a public defenders office. (At least that's how it was in the 80s.) Other federal court jurisdictions had public defenders on staff at ll times who's sole purpose was to defend indigent defendants. On the surface the difference may not seem like a big difference, but it is. In order to practice law in the federal courts in this district, you have to put your name in that hat for that court appointed attorney pool.

So the question becomes, if you're an indigent defendant, would you rather have someone defending you who's full time job is representing indigent clients, or some guy that HAS to do it, and is getting paid 5% of his normal hourly rate? In the latter case it's best for that lawyer to do everything he can to dispose of the case quickly (plea bargain) whether the person he is representing is guilty or not.

I am sure that's true. i would like to see the political will to overhaul the justice system but no one will, it's too big, too complicated and too hidden from the political elite to worry about.

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Ukraine
Timeline

Where are the Asians or Indians or Latinos in this study?

That doesn't matter. If you still look at the raw numbers white people are committing no less crime that black people.

But on a percentage wise basis.....whites are much less likely to steal from you.

You need to be angry at the blacks who are committing crimes and causing problems for you......not the whites who are reacting to the fact the blacks are much more likely to be criminals(for whatever reason that is?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where are the Asians or Indians or Latinos in this study?

But on a percentage wise basis.....whites are much less likely to steal from you.

You need to be angry at the blacks who are committing crimes and causing problems for you......not the whites who are reacting to the fact the blacks are much more likely to be criminals(for whatever reason that is?)

No, she shouldn't. Because Janelle is taking care of business. She, nor any other person of color should have to bear that burden. If that's the case, then you should have to take responsibility for any crime a white person commits.

“Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated.” – Coretta Scott King

"Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge." -Toni Morrison

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it.

Martin Luther King, Jr.

President-Obama-jpg.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Ukraine
Timeline
If that's the case, then you should have to take responsibility for any crime a white person commits.

Who said anything about taking responsibility? I am just pointing out misplaced anger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who said anything about taking responsibility? I am just pointing out misplaced anger.

The issue is, when black people commit crime or do anything else for that matter, it affects all of us. Folks assume we're going to rob, beat or kill them based on just skin color alone. I've been called a big scary black dude before. And I'm as far removed from that as anyone can be.

“Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated.” – Coretta Scott King

"Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge." -Toni Morrison

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it.

Martin Luther King, Jr.

President-Obama-jpg.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if there were only 2 white men in the U.S., one committed a crime and the other one did not, would it be fair to hold the non-criminal accountable for the crime the criminal committed. Even if they lived in two different freaking states and didn't even know each other?

If there were only 2 white men in the US (assuming that I'm not white and I don't know either one) and one was a criminal and one wasn't. I would not hold the innocent one responsible at all for what the criminal did.

But, if I met one of these two white men, I would be cautious because there's a 50% chance that he's a criminal.

To summarize, white men obviously are responsible for very little of the crime in the US (there's only 2); but if you meet a white man there is a very disproportionate chance that the person is a criminal.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The issue is, when black people commit crime or do anything else for that matter, it affects all of us. Folks assume we're going to rob, beat or kill them based on just skin color alone. I've been called a big scary black dude before. And I'm as far removed from that as anyone can be.

You are a big scary black dude, :rofl::rofl:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are a big scary black dude, :rofl::rofl:

I hate you. :devil:

“Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated.” – Coretta Scott King

"Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge." -Toni Morrison

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it.

Martin Luther King, Jr.

President-Obama-jpg.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate you. :devil:

Personal attack noted and filed away for future possible mod action, reference angry comment from big scary black dude, who oddly enough has a stunningly beautiful wife

Edited by The Nature Boy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...