Roll Call of Fallen Commrades

[Novembro 1,763]

I strive to throw pornography into everything.

[GandD 5,966]

not much. forcing husband to make din-din while i drink and wax lolosophical with you lot.

EWE?

As a rule, I don't typically drink on Thursdays. Its not a "sanctioned" day for me. BUT, you's guys are making me want to go crack a Rickard's Red #GodBlessCanadianBeer

Uppity? Did you know thats racist?

If it came out of my mouth, you can be sure its racist.

[Novembro 1,763]

As a rule, I don't typically drink on Thursdays. Its not a "sanctioned" day for me. BUT, you's guys are making me want to go crack a Rickard's Red #GodBlessCanadianBeer

If I show you this naked cat, will you consider it?.

[Harpa Timsah 13,258]

I strive to throw pornography into everything.

Porn is not fun with your parents or people your parent's age. Mixed company and all that.

[Crashed~N2~Me 970]

You know you love it.

It transcends time and space. Thanks!

[Operator 1,927]

I shocked someone from this gaggle threw out a Steve Aoki mash.

[GandD 5,966]

I don't see a need for a "second tier" forum or more rules or anything.

The problem as I see it is that the modding is inconsistent. The new moderators lack context to decide what should be removed or not, because they don't want to read the whole thread, and cherry pick one post based on whims or to appease whoever reported it. A report does not require action, it does require a check that should come down to mods who know how to call things when they see it.

The TOS, and any "law" is purposefully pliable and non distinct, how can someone define emotions or responses? Some new mods are obsessed with the letter of the law, instead of the spirit of the law. There is no need to read the TOS daily, or make some giant list. When someone has gone too far should be fairly obvious. The problem is that some mods lack the ability or the patience to explain their reasoning.

Another problem I see is that the new mods are happy to take the easy way out and say something is locked for "bickering" or "drama," when they should have the balls to say something is locked for personal attacks, racism, etc.

I think people are perfectly able to have polarized adult conversations without resorting to name calling, racism, or throwing in pornography for fun.

I agree with all of this, especially the bolded part.

If I show you this naked cat, will you consider it?.

[Novembro 1,763]

Porn is not fun with your parents or people your parent's age. Mixed company and all that.

Imagine trying to watch a nice Lars von Trier film with your mum.

Woof.

[Pooky 3,782]

I think people are perfectly able to have polarized adult conversations without resorting to name calling, racism, or throwing in pornography for fun.

They may be able, but a few here are definitely not willing.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

I don't see a need for a "second tier" forum or more rules or anything.

The problem as I see it is that the modding is inconsistent. The new moderators lack context to decide what should be removed or not, because they don't want to read the whole thread, and cherry pick one post based on whims or to appease whoever reported it. A report does not require action, it does require a check that should come down to mods who know how to call things when they see it.

The TOS, and any "law" is purposefully pliable and non distinct, how can someone define emotions or responses? Some new mods are obsessed with the letter of the law, instead of the spirit of the law. There is no need to read the TOS daily, or make some giant list. When someone has gone too far should be fairly obvious. The problem is that some mods lack the ability or the patience to explain their reasoning.

Another problem I see is that the new mods are happy to take the easy way out and say something is locked for "bickering" or "drama," when they should have the balls to say something is locked for personal attacks, racism, etc.

I think people are perfectly able to have polarized adult conversations without resorting to name calling, racism, or throwing in pornography for fun.

I so ever politely non pornographically disagree .

If someone was openly racist personal attack etc, why not just say it. Lot less controversial than just because. Trust me if you saw some of the "court orders" written you would not think that.

As for personal attacks. If I am cool with it, and the person I am arguing with is cool with it, and both of us perfectly understand each other, and know it's not meant in a mean spirit, why should anyone else care ?

I meany if Penny of all people can get nuked ???

P.S. I missed the porn ??

Edited May 23, 2014 by The Nature Boy

[GandD 5,966]

I walked in on my mom watching "The Hills Have Eyes 2" once at my house. In her defense, I don't think she knows how to change the channel on my TV.

[Crashed~N2~Me 970]

The problem = The mods become fatigued = seek path of least resistance = ban 'em and move on .

Mods are human...need to take the human out of moderation.

& some1 either needs to buy that cat a drink..or shoot it.

[GandD 5,966]

Less Mods, More Pizza Cat #BringBackPenny

[Crashed~N2~Me 970]

I so ever politely non pornographically disagree .

If someone was openly racist personal attack etc, why not just say it. Lot less controversial than just because. Trust me if you saw some of the "court orders" written you would not think that.

As for personal attacks. If I am cool with it, and the person I am arguing with is cool with it, and both of us perfectly understand each other, and know it's not meant in a mean spirit, why should anyone else care ?

I meany if Penny of all people can get nuked ???

P.S. I missed the porn ??

Cat porn

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Porn is not fun with your parents or people your parent's age. Mixed company and all that.

My dad would be 90 something if still alive. Loved a good porn. Only thing would calm him down hen he went senile

You do know it's your fault for saying porn