Roll Call of Fallen Commrades

[Penny Lane 8,159]

What did I miss?

[spookyturtle 9,466]

What did I miss?

You really don't want to know.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

What did I miss?

Spooky got promoted to Mod LOL

[Pooky 3,825]

Spooky got promoted to Mod LOL

His Friday must have sucked harder than a Dyson.

[GandD 5,966]

What did I miss?

Well, we showed our a$$es in the Ewok thread.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Well, we showed our a$$es in the Ewok thread.

We Hell I been good tonight

[GandD 5,966]

We Hell I been good tonight

I'll admit, you've been relatively stoic since the "kip ban fiasco"

NB for CE&HST Mod!

[spookyturtle 9,466]

Well, we showed our a$$es in the Ewok thread.

I was politically correct and didn't offend.

[GandD 5,966]

I was politically correct and didn't offend.

It doesn't matter. You and I both knew what we were doing. Either way, I'd say after the ensuing fiasco, all credibility from our "group" went out the window. Krit krit nailed it on the head.

[spookyturtle 9,466]

It doesn't matter. You and I both knew what we were doing. Either way, I'd say after the ensuing fiasco, all credibility from our "group" went out the window. Krit krit nailed it on the head.

I was trying to explain the urinating in cereal phrase which seemed to get blown out of proportion a bit. If some users feel that some members seem to get up on the wrong side of the bed, that really isn't an insult or low blow. If there is disruption and it follows a fairly consistent pattern and involves the same group of users over and over, then it's really a valid observation, isn't it? That isn't against TOS, but the name calling is.

[GandD 5,966]

I was trying to explain the urinating in cereal phrase which seemed to get blown out of proportion a bit. If some users feel that some members seem to get up on the wrong side of the bed, that really isn't an insult or low blow. If there is disruption and it follows a fairly consistent pattern and involves the same group of users over and over, then it's really a valid observation, isn't it? That isn't against TOS, but the name calling is.

Spooks, you and I agree. 100%, then and now. But what happened after that in the mod thread after those comments just make us all look like a bunch of dysfunctional children. After that kind of blow up, what will he think?

[spookyturtle 9,466]

Spooks, you and I agree. 100%, then and now. But what happened after that in the mod thread after those comments just make us all look like a bunch of dysfunctional children. After that kind of blow up, what will he think?

I guess we all know what he will think. I chose not to get involved in the bickering in that thread, there are plenty of other places to do so. I'm no angel, I know that, but sometimes I do call it like I see it. It is what it is. We both know that there is plenty of intentional disruption.

[GandD 5,966]

I guess we all know what he will think. I chose not to get involved in the bickering in that thread, there are plenty of other places to do so. I'm no angel, I know that, but sometimes I do call it like I see it. It is what it is. We both know that there is plenty of intentional disruption.

Oh yeah.

[GandD 5,966]

You guys think AJ and Kathryn are married?

[GandD 5,966]

Wait, I just realized. Kathryn is an AJ sock puppet. Ewok = AJ and this whole site is an illusion. The cake is a lie.