Jump to content
supercaleroman

AOS Denied due to unauthorized employment

 Share

29 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Frankly, I find it ridiculous that overstaying your visa (say, arriving on a K1 and not marrying w/in the 90 days) doesn't get you some kind of penalty.

Why have the 'rules' for the K1 if they're not going to be enforced? Why not just say 'arrive in the US and marry whenever you want to, then adjust status'?

Those who marry w/in the 90 days don't breeze through while the others languish - so what's the benefit of following the 'rules'?

Edited by TracyTN
SA4userbar.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
Frankly, I find it ridiculous that overstaying your visa (say, arriving on a K1 and not marrying w/in the 90 days) doesn't get you some kind of penalty.

Why have the 'rules' for the K1 if they're not going to be enforced? Why not just say 'arrive in the US and marry whenever you want to, then adjust status'?

Those who marry w/in the 90 days don't breeze through while the others languish - so what's the benefit of following the 'rules'?

Precisely. Why are we even bothering to wait for his EAD when apparently it's all fine & dandy to cheat your way to working?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frankly, I find it ridiculous that overstaying your visa (say, arriving on a K1 and not marrying w/in the 90 days) doesn't get you some kind of penalty.

Why have the 'rules' for the K1 if they're not going to be enforced? Why not just say 'arrive in the US and marry whenever you want to, then adjust status'?

Those who marry w/in the 90 days don't breeze through while the others languish - so what's the benefit of following the 'rules'?

actually USCIS just published a *wish list* that eases up the already light penalty (having to file a concurrent i130) for marrying outside of the 90 days. even USCIS sees room for improvement is needed.

i guess as far as following the rules, one has to do what is best for them. look at many of us who are pending after doing everything right, there are penalties for doing things wrong, and there are still penalties for doing things right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Peru
Timeline

I didn't consider it flaunting, just honesty. I'd get into the whole story but that's neither here nor there.

Won't happen again, didn't mean to violate the TOS.

My husband doesn't work under the table, he pays taxes. He's just not legally authorized to be employed.

Wait to flaunt your illegal acitvities, yay for you. :angry: /sarcasm

violation of the TOS...?

this is the way the world ends

this is the way the world ends

this is the way the world ends

not with a bang but a whimper

[ts eliot]

aos timeline:

married: jan 5, 2007

noa 1: march 2nd, 2007

interview @ tampa, fl office: april 26, 2007

green card received: may 5, 2007

removal of conditions timeline:

03/26/2009 - received in VSC

07/20/2009 - card production ordered!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Peru
Timeline

Not everyone enters on a K1 visa...some people enter legally, have the foundation of their family pass away in a preventable accident, find negligence in said person's death, and are told to get reparations they cannot leave the country. Bills still have to get paid, and that's that.

Frankly, I find it ridiculous that overstaying your visa (say, arriving on a K1 and not marrying w/in the 90 days) doesn't get you some kind of penalty.

Why have the 'rules' for the K1 if they're not going to be enforced? Why not just say 'arrive in the US and marry whenever you want to, then adjust status'?

Those who marry w/in the 90 days don't breeze through while the others languish - so what's the benefit of following the 'rules'?

this is the way the world ends

this is the way the world ends

this is the way the world ends

not with a bang but a whimper

[ts eliot]

aos timeline:

married: jan 5, 2007

noa 1: march 2nd, 2007

interview @ tampa, fl office: april 26, 2007

green card received: may 5, 2007

removal of conditions timeline:

03/26/2009 - received in VSC

07/20/2009 - card production ordered!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

actually as I understand it, the IRS rarely ever *speaks to* USCIS. but i am not an expert.

I do not think even the people in the uscis talk to each other.we have submitted the same paperwork over and over.

:lol: im sorry for you, but good point. also as seen in the other threads where an interview was cancelled and when the applicants showed up anyway they were approved!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not everyone enters on a K1 visa...some people enter legally, have the foundation of their family pass away in a preventable accident, find negligence in said person's death, and are told to get reparations they cannot leave the country. Bills still have to get paid, and that's that.
Frankly, I find it ridiculous that overstaying your visa (say, arriving on a K1 and not marrying w/in the 90 days) doesn't get you some kind of penalty.

Why have the 'rules' for the K1 if they're not going to be enforced? Why not just say 'arrive in the US and marry whenever you want to, then adjust status'?

Those who marry w/in the 90 days don't breeze through while the others languish - so what's the benefit of following the 'rules'?

I am well aware that 'not everyone' enters on a K1. I've been around this site a while, so I'm not that dim.

I was simply making a point about one of the things that gets 'forgiven' with marriage to a USC - going past the 90 days on a K1 - and how it seems silly to have that as a 'rule' for K1 adjusters, even though it basically holds no water.

As lal brandow said, everyone has to use their own discretion per their personal situation. But that doesn't negate the fact that people who do it 'legally' are essentially no better off than those who don't.

Edited by TracyTN
SA4userbar.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Peru
Timeline

I agree with that. Sorry I misread what you were saying...didn't mean to do that :)

Not everyone enters on a K1 visa...some people enter legally, have the foundation of their family pass away in a preventable accident, find negligence in said person's death, and are told to get reparations they cannot leave the country. Bills still have to get paid, and that's that.
Frankly, I find it ridiculous that overstaying your visa (say, arriving on a K1 and not marrying w/in the 90 days) doesn't get you some kind of penalty.

Why have the 'rules' for the K1 if they're not going to be enforced? Why not just say 'arrive in the US and marry whenever you want to, then adjust status'?

Those who marry w/in the 90 days don't breeze through while the others languish - so what's the benefit of following the 'rules'?

I am well aware that 'not everyone' enters on a K1. I've been around this site a while, so I'm not that dim.

I was simply making a point about one of the things that gets 'forgiven' with marriage to a USC - going past the 90 days on a K1 - and how it seems silly to have that as a 'rule' for K1 adjusters, even though it basically holds no water.

this is the way the world ends

this is the way the world ends

this is the way the world ends

not with a bang but a whimper

[ts eliot]

aos timeline:

married: jan 5, 2007

noa 1: march 2nd, 2007

interview @ tampa, fl office: april 26, 2007

green card received: may 5, 2007

removal of conditions timeline:

03/26/2009 - received in VSC

07/20/2009 - card production ordered!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frankly, I find it ridiculous that overstaying your visa (say, arriving on a K1 and not marrying w/in the 90 days) doesn't get you some kind of penalty.

Why have the 'rules' for the K1 if they're not going to be enforced? Why not just say 'arrive in the US and marry whenever you want to, then adjust status'?

Those who marry w/in the 90 days don't breeze through while the others languish - so what's the benefit of following the 'rules'?

For me personally...the benefit is *never having to look over my shoulder, or wondering if, and when they would find out I did something *against the rules (law) or whatever* I did it right, it took awhile, but now that it is behind me (well for a year or so anyway) I am so glad I did it by the *rules* I feel more peaceful about it now...but that is just my own take on it.

AOS, EAD, AP, filed on Feb 8, 2006

NOA received Feb 18, 2006

Biometrics done on Apr 21, at St. Paul office..wait some more......

Touched on April 24 and 28

email aproval for AP on May 1

email approval for EAD on May 3

received AP on May 3

received EAD in mail on May 8

start work of June 1

AOS interview in Bloomington on July 19 8am

AOS approved,passport stamped on July 19

as of Dec 10, 2006 still no greencard....waiting and waiting....USCIS says we are approved, and check back in 60 days...no idea what is happening

Dec 18, email stating welcome letter is in the mail

Dec 20, 5 emails saying they ordered production of my new card......

Dec 24...welcome to America letter in the snail mail

Dec 26...GC in hand and all is correct...

NOTE TO SELF..file to lift conditions 04/19/08

04/22/08 filed to lift conditions

05/01/08 package returned wrong form

05/05/08 re-submitted right form to california

05/09/08 cheque cashed

05/13/08 NOA

05/19/08 appointment letter for biometrics received..appointment on 05/28/08 at 11 am at USCIS St. Paul

05/28/08 took my two appointment letters and had my fingerprints done

11/13/08 touched and email stating card production ordered and will be sent to me in 30 days

11/21/08 GC in hand no mistakes expires 11/13/18

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not everyone enters on a K1 visa...some people enter legally, have the foundation of their family pass away in a preventable accident, find negligence in said person's death, and are told to get reparations they cannot leave the country. Bills still have to get paid, and that's that.
Frankly, I find it ridiculous that overstaying your visa (say, arriving on a K1 and not marrying w/in the 90 days) doesn't get you some kind of penalty.

Why have the 'rules' for the K1 if they're not going to be enforced? Why not just say 'arrive in the US and marry whenever you want to, then adjust status'?

Those who marry w/in the 90 days don't breeze through while the others languish - so what's the benefit of following the 'rules'?

I am well aware that 'not everyone' enters on a K1. I've been around this site a while, so I'm not that dim.

I was simply making a point about one of the things that gets 'forgiven' with marriage to a USC - going past the 90 days on a K1 - and how it seems silly to have that as a 'rule' for K1 adjusters, even though it basically holds no water.

As lal brandow said, everyone has to use their own discretion per their personal situation. But that doesn't negate the fact that people who do it 'legally' are essentially no better off than those who don't.

People who go past 90 days on their K1 visa and subsequently file an I-130/1-485 are following the "rules" and are doing things "legally".

2001 Met

2005 Married

I-485/I-130

12/06/2006-------Mailed I-130/1-485

12/16/2006--------Recieved NOA 1 (I-130 & I-485)

12/18/2006--------Touched I-130/I-485

01/20/2007--------Biometrics

05/10/2007 -- Interview, Approved!

05/22/2007 GREEN CARD arrives!!!

02/2009 - File to lift conditions

I-765

12/14/2006--- Mailed EAD App.

01/20/2007--- Biometrics

02/09/2005-------Sent in request to Congressional office for assistance with expediting EAD.

02/13/2007 -------- EAD Approved!

02/26/2007 - ------EAD received

Removal of Conditions:

05/12/2009 -- Overnighted application by USPS express mail (VSC).

05/14/2009 -- Green Card expired.

05/23/2009 --- Check cleared bank.

05/26/2009 -- Received NOA (NOA date May 15, 2009, guess they aren't deporting me).

05/29/2009- Biometrics Notice date

06/01/2009- Received Biometrics Letter

06/18/2009 - Biometrics

09/23/2009 - date of decision to approve (letter received), just waiting for card. No online updates whatsoever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frankly, I find it ridiculous that overstaying your visa (say, arriving on a K1 and not marrying w/in the 90 days) doesn't get you some kind of penalty.

Why have the 'rules' for the K1 if they're not going to be enforced? Why not just say 'arrive in the US and marry whenever you want to, then adjust status'?

Those who marry w/in the 90 days don't breeze through while the others languish - so what's the benefit of following the 'rules'?

For me personally...the benefit is *never having to look over my shoulder, or wondering if, and when they would find out I did something *against the rules (law) or whatever* I did it right, it took awhile, but now that it is behind me (well for a year or so anyway) I am so glad I did it by the *rules* I feel more peaceful about it now...but that is just my own take on it.

I totally agree about not having to wonder 'if'. I just haven't heard of many cases of a K1er going past their 90 days, or someone working w/out authorization, that had any real consequences. Then again, perhaps I've just not read enough.

Not everyone enters on a K1 visa...some people enter legally, have the foundation of their family pass away in a preventable accident, find negligence in said person's death, and are told to get reparations they cannot leave the country. Bills still have to get paid, and that's that.
Frankly, I find it ridiculous that overstaying your visa (say, arriving on a K1 and not marrying w/in the 90 days) doesn't get you some kind of penalty.

Why have the 'rules' for the K1 if they're not going to be enforced? Why not just say 'arrive in the US and marry whenever you want to, then adjust status'?

Those who marry w/in the 90 days don't breeze through while the others languish - so what's the benefit of following the 'rules'?

I am well aware that 'not everyone' enters on a K1. I've been around this site a while, so I'm not that dim.

I was simply making a point about one of the things that gets 'forgiven' with marriage to a USC - going past the 90 days on a K1 - and how it seems silly to have that as a 'rule' for K1 adjusters, even though it basically holds no water.

As lal brandow said, everyone has to use their own discretion per their personal situation. But that doesn't negate the fact that people who do it 'legally' are essentially no better off than those who don't.

People who go past 90 days on their K1 visa and subsequently file an I-130/1-485 are following the "rules" and are doing things "legally".

Once they've gone against the terms of the original visa (the K1), yes, they are doing things 'legally' and 'by the rules' to do the I 130/I 485 (but thanks for your sarcastic answer anyway!).

Yet again, my point was not about what they have done once starting the AOS process, but the fact that the 90 day 'rule' for K1ers just doesn't seem like much of a 'rule'. Just my opinion.

SA4userbar.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Mexico
Timeline
Doing some reading, I found some legal texts where it said that AOS will be denied for admitting to have worked without authorization.

Has anyone heard of any real cases where and AOS filed after marriage has been denied in those grounds?

This might help clarify:

http://www.americanlaw.com/aos.html

Unauthorized Employment, Unlawful Status or Failure to Maintain Status

Aliens who have engaged in unauthorized employment since their entry into the United States are barred from adjustment of status. However, this statutory bar does not apply to immediate relatives of United States citizens

http://www.hooyou.com/i-485/eligible.html

Unauthorized Employment, Unlawful Status or Failure to Maintain Status -- Aliens who have engaged in unauthorized employment, do not in lawful status at the time of filing of the adjustment application, or have failed to continuously maintain status for even a single day since their entry into the United States are barred from adjustment of status.

Exceptions -- This rule has several exceptions, which include:

Immediate relatives (spouses, parents and unmarried children under 21-year old) of U.S. citizens are still eligible to adjust their status;

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
“;}
×
×
  • Create New...