Jump to content

46 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Country: Vietnam
Timeline
Posted

Not even including the jobs the plant brings that services the facility. Lot more jobs than the employees of the plant itself.


Is $10,000 per job really too much?

Every job brings with it an entire family. These aren't families that will draw benefits. These are families that will pay taxes and contribute. Net net, they pay $10k for a job but get back a lot more over the long haul.

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

Not even including the jobs the plant brings that services the facility. Lot more jobs than the employees of the plant itself.

Is $10,000 per job really too much?

Every job brings with it an entire family. These aren't families that will draw benefits. These are families that will pay taxes and contribute. Net net, they pay $10k for a job but get back a lot more over the long haul.

What's the difference between the family of a Toyota worker and the family of someone working at Walmart besides probably having more disposable income? Both families have to buy groceries, pay rent (mortgage), clothes, gas, car payments, etc.

Filed: Timeline
Posted (edited)

Texas has room.

Yeah but judging from my recent visit to Dallas, they're filling that room much faster than they can connect it. The infrastructure is nowhere near keeping pace with the seemingly exploding population. You can't get from here to there around Dallas, you only get from this traffic jam to that traffic jam. And there's not much in terms of alternate means of transport. Not at all appealing. They may eventually figure that out but right now it's rather hideous.

What's the difference between the family of a Toyota worker and the family of someone working at Walmart besides probably having more disposable income? Both families have to buy groceries, pay rent (mortgage), clothes, gas, car payments, etc.

The difference is that the family working at Toyota can afford these things. ;)

Edited by Mr. Big Dog
Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

The difference is that the family working at Toyota can afford these things. ;)

But technically, the state is giving those Toyota workers a big fat $10,000 tax rebate. If Texas likes finagling with taxes to encourage economic growth, it would make sense to at least raise the minimum wage.

Filed: Timeline
Posted (edited)

But technically, the state is giving those Toyota workers a big fat $10,000 tax rebate. If Texas likes finagling with taxes to encourage economic growth, it would make sense to at least raise the minimum wage.

Texas does it better than Floriduh. Here, we hand out million dollar packages for retailers to set up shop. Not only do they not really create any jobs but rather relocate them from other retailers, but what we're talking about are by and large part-time minimum wage jobs that would exist one way or the other. No need to pizz millions of dollars of taxpayer money into corporate HQs for that. But hey, they teach worse math here than almost anywhere else in the world. Leave it to Republicans and no means of corporate welfare will ever be left underutilized.

Edited by Mr. Big Dog
Filed: Timeline
Posted

But technically, the state is giving those Toyota workers a big fat $10,000 tax rebate. If Texas likes finagling with taxes to encourage economic growth, it would make sense to at least raise the minimum wage.

Texas likes finagling with taxes to grow the bottom lines of corporations. The Toyota workers get jack. The corporation gets a $10K wage subsidy per employee. What you're proposing would be doing the opposite. It would cost the corporation money.

Filed: Timeline
Posted

Texas likes finagling with taxes to grow the bottom lines of corporations. The Toyota workers get jack. The corporation gets a $10K wage subsidy per employee. What you're proposing would be doing the opposite. It would cost the corporation money.

I'm thinking about this and it sounds good to me.

The employee gets an automatic raise due to the lower cost of living.

The employer gets an infusion of cash from the Texas taxpayer; combine that with the lower cost of living in Texas and the employer gets a nice raise too.

Texas taxpayers will undoubtedly gain tax revenues from these employees in the long run, well in excess of the 10K the taxpayer spent to bring them there.

Who loses here?

Besides California.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...