Jump to content

  

12 members have voted

  1. 1. How comfortable are you with "hundreds, perhaps thousands" of nonviolent drug offenders back on the streets where your kids play?

    • Very comfortable.
    • A little comfortable.
    • Not comfortable.
    • Very uncomfortable
  2. 2. Most nonviolent drug offenders are black. Do you think that has anything to do with this?

  3. 3. Most marijuana legalization fetishists vote Democratic. Do you think that has anything to do with this?



42 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline
Posted

I doubt it saves a penny.

Those who are serving their time are on the whole a lot more likely to be involved in other crimes not to mention fathering more mouths for the state to feed, house educate and then later incarcerate.

The only reason crime rates have dropped is because incarceration rates have risen.

You suggested it would save money, my post is to question the math by the statistical evidence we have available.

At any rate the re-arrect and re-incarceration rate is so high, many will be back in contact with the expensive legal system again within 3 years anyway.

As a question of fairness, it might or might not be worth relooking at some of those convicted and see if another type of sentence would not be better applied.

Crime rates were more likely connected to Tetraethyllead.

1d35bdb6477b38fedf8f1ad2b4c743ea.jpg

Filed: Timeline
Posted

I doubt it saves a penny.

Those who are serving their time are on the whole a lot more likely to be involved in other crimes not to mention fathering more mouths for the state to feed, house educate and then later incarcerate.

The only reason crime rates have dropped is because incarceration rates have risen.

You suggested it would save money, my post is to question the math by the statistical evidence we have available.

At any rate the re-arrect and re-incarceration rate is so high, many will be back in contact with the expensive legal system again within 3 years anyway.

As a question of fairness, it might or might not be worth relooking at some of those convicted and see if another type of sentence would not be better applied.

Someone will ask, so here are some statistics.

FvpUMOZ.png

0Dsmd96.png

Source: http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/rpr94.pdf

Filed: Timeline
Posted

what qualifies as a 'nonviolent drug offender'?

an ounce or less of weed...yah ok. (likely personal use)

an 8 ball of coke... well if it wasn't separated to...ok. (?personal use?)

a couple ounces of meth... hell no. (not personal use)

All these decisions are run through a political lens, so I doubt you'll be seeing any meth dealers.

Posted

in his final years in office, Obama ... wants to use his previously dormant pardon power as part of a larger strategy to restore fairness to the criminal-justice system. A senior administration official tells Yahoo News the president could grant clemency to "hundreds, perhaps thousands" of people locked up for nonviolent drug crimes by the time he leaves office — a stunning number that hasn't been seen since Gerald Ford extended amnesty to Vietnam draft dodgers in the 1970s.

The scope of the new clemency initiative is so large that administration officials are preparing a series of personnel and process changes to help them manage the influx of petitions they expect Obama to approve. Among the changes is reforming the recently censured office within the Justice Department responsible for processing pardon petitions. Yahoo News has learned that the pardon attorney, Ronald Rodgers, who was criticized in a 2012 Internal watchdog report for mishandling a high-profile clemency petition, is likely to step down as part of that overhaul. Additional procedures for handling large numbers of clemency petitions could be announced as soon as this week, a senior administration official said, though it could take longer.

http://news.yahoo.com/obama-plans-clemency-for-hundreds-of-drug-offenders--162714911.html

I think most Americans with any common sense know our drug policy is absurd. However releasing many 1000's that violated our laws could send the wrong message. I think on a case by case basis maybe. Weed delaers, small time street peddlers. No crack dealers at all. Just weed, cocaine,etc.

Hopefully and presumably it means drug users, not drug dealers.

there you go, people who got in trouble for possession.

Filed: Timeline
Posted

Blogger Andy McCarthy sums this up nicely:

"So the pardon power is going to be his way of rewriting the federal narcotics laws which he personally thinks are too severe. So it evidently doesn't matter both that Congress has written these laws, that trials have taken place under these laws, and that his core constitutional responsibility is to take care that those laws be faithfully executed. He's going to rewrite them unilaterally."

"The President has enormous power. And the pardon power's there for good reason. If in individual cases, injustice has been done, if there are mitigating circumstances in a case that warrant a correction, that's why the President has the power. But he's not taking about individual cases here. He's talking about a category of federal law that he philosophically disagrees with. So he's essentially going to rewrite Congress laws by springing everyone. This is not about individual justice in cases and mitigating mistakes or hardships. This is about rewriting federal law."

It becomes increasingly more clear that the preznit received his education in the law so as to be better prepared to subvert it.

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline
Posted

Zero tolerance for drug offenders. Deport them all, even if they were born here.

Now that's change I can believe in!

One skew, though - send em all to Liberia, regardless of country of birth.

Sometimes my language usage seems confusing - please feel free to 'read it twice', just in case !
Ya know, you can find the answer to your question with the advanced search tool, when using a PC? Ditch the handphone, come back later on a PC, and try again.

-=-=-=-=-=R E A D ! ! !=-=-=-=-=-

Whoa Nelly ! Want NVC Info? see http://www.visajourney.com/wiki/index.php/NVC_Process

Congratulations on your approval ! We All Applaud your accomplishment with Most Wonderful Kissies !

 

Posted

Looks like the preznit and his pal Holder are aiming their clemency at crack offenders as well. :ranting:

Interesting that none of the three major networks reported these plans. They were busy flogging Easter bunny stories instead. Worthless, lapdog media...

Taking drugs should be handled as a social and moral matter, not a criminal matter. The U.S. has been using a social problem as a criminal problem for reasons I care not to mention for a long time and it needs to be corrected. We don't lock up celebrities for their drug problems, Lindsay Lohan, Amanda Bynes, why do we lock up the poor? Sorry, I cannot be upset about this.

A crack dealer should stay locked up, just like an ecstasy, heroin, meth, cocaine, etc, except weed.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...