Ted Cruz to the Future - Comic Coloring Activity Book

[one...two...tree 2,762]

What better way to combat the liberal indoctrination of our youth who attend public schools than to do a little indoctrination of our own.

..........

In a continuation of the company's popular series Tell the Truth - Tell it Often - Tell the Children designed for all ages to promote positive healthy discussion and understanding, Really Big Coloring Books®, Inc. (RBCB) turns complex challenges or issues into a relevant format with an emphasis for youth. The Cruz to the Future book is a non-partisan, fact-driven view of how Texas Sen. Rafael Edward Ted Cruz became a U.S. senator and details, through his quotes and public information his ideas for what he believes will help America grow. Cruz has openly identifies with the Tea Party and garners support from the Republican Liberty Caucus and many independents including democrats. The Washington Post calls Cruz s Texas senate election victory the biggest upset ... a true grassroots victory against very long odds.

http://www.amazon.com/dp/1619530953/ref=cm_sw_r_fa_dp_jGAmtb1TDYQHPJKH

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Oh boy.

[Novembro 1,763]

Diversity!

Freedom!

Inclusion!

GUN RIGHTS!

[Sousuke 1,214]

I don't think Gun rights need their own leaf, they are apart of freedom as they are a civil liberty.

[Darnell 8,479]

All Hail Canada !

All Hail Canada Exports !

Edited March 25, 2014 by Darnell

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

I don't think Gun rights need their own leaf, they are apart of freedom as they are a civil liberty.

Freedom and civil liberty can and do flourish without gun rights. In fact, there are many places where civil liberty and freedom are more in focus and better developed than here while gun rights play virtually no role at all. The suggestion that the actually important rights are dependent on gun rights is the biggest hoax of all times. The former are most certainly not dependent on the latter. In fact, if anything, the latter stifle the former.

[Sousuke 1,214]

Freedom and civil liberty can and do flourish without gun rights. In fact, there are many places where civil liberty and freedom are more in focus and better developed than here while gun rights play virtually no role at all. The suggestion that the actually important rights are dependent on gun rights is the biggest hoax of all times. The former are most certainly not dependent on the latter. In fact, if anything, the latter stifle the former.

Two things. First, the majority of modern democratic nations with their constitutions (both written & unwritten) came to be by force of arms.

From the US to the UK, to Italy & France etc. There are of course exceptions such as Spain.

The above is the lesser point.

The greater point is that the right to bear arms is equivalent to the right of self defense. Within the Commonwealth for instance, I don't think any one would disagree with the notion that Canadians have a stronger right to self defense than Australians, English, Welsh etc.

[JohnR! 5,495]

At least he admits it is a comic book... besides, chances are most of his constituency is not into reading anyway, so a coloring book will make a nice addition to their mobile home library.

Edited March 26, 2014 by Gegel

[deleted-05292014 331]

Two things. First, the majority of modern democratic nations with their constitutions (both written & unwritten) came to be by force of arms.

From the US to the UK, to Italy & France etc. There are of course exceptions such as Spain.

The above is the lesser point.

The greater point is that the right to bear arms is equivalent to the right of self defense. Within the Commonwealth for instance, I don't think any one would disagree with the notion that Canadians have a stronger right to self defense than Australians, English, Welsh etc.

I disagree. Off the top of my head, Scandanvia (Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Norway) I don't recall them coming into being by force of arms. Same with the worlds largest democracy, India. I don't think the Swiss did either.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Doesn't even matter whether democracies came about by the use of force or not. Fact is that they can be maintained and that freedom and liberty can and do flourish all over the world despite the people of the nations where they do not still clinging to their silly little guns.

[Sousuke 1,214]

I disagree. Off the top of my head, Scandanvia (Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Norway) I don't recall them coming into being by force of arms. Same with the worlds largest democracy, India. I don't think the Swiss did either.

Finland had a war of independence. Norway's constitution is a result of war with Sweden. Denmark's history is very complicated so I really don't know how to classify it.

The Swiss came out of a civil war with a constitution based on the federal system.

India had a revolt from which the end result was a parliamentary system through tighter government control from the UK as opposed to the East India Company. The end result was independence after the second world war.

[Sousuke 1,214]

Doesn't even matter whether democracies came about by the use of force or not. Fact is that they can be maintained and that freedom and liberty can and do flourish all over the world despite the people of the nations where they do not still clinging to their silly little guns.

Without a full right to self defense, I would argue that liberty is incomplete.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Without a full right to self defense, I would argue that liberty is incomplete.

You might. But a right to self defense does not require any gun rights.

[Sousuke 1,214]

You might. But a right to self defense does not require any gun rights.

Then answer this.

Who has the stronger right of self defense.

A person living in Surrey BC or someone in Surrey England? Which government allows the stronger tool?

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Then answer this.

Who has the stronger right of self defense.

A person living in Surrey BC or someone in Surrey England? Which government allows the stronger tool?

That's just silly. What you're saying is that the bigger a gun one has, the stronger a right to slf defense one enjoys and thus the more liberty one has. I'm sorry but that is just ridiculous. smh